Mesh considerations for finite element blast modelling in biomechanics

Finite element (FE) modelling is a popular tool for studying human body response to blast exposure. However, blast modelling is a complex problem owing to more numerous fluid–structure interactions (FSIs) and the high–frequency loading that accompanies blast exposures. This study investigates FE mesh design for blast modelling using a sphere in a closed-ended shock tube meshed with varying element sizes using both tetrahedral and hexahedral elements. FSI was consistent for sphere-to-fluid element ratios between 0.25 and 4, and acceleration response was similar for both element types (R2 = 0.997). Tetrahedral elements were found to become increasingly volatile following shock loading, causing higher pressures and stresses than predicted with the hexahedral elements. Deviatoric stress response was dependent on the sphere mesh size (p < 0.001), while the pressure response was dependent on the shock tube mesh size (p < 0.001). The results of this study highlight the necessity for mesh sensitivity analysis in blast models.

[1]  Jason Forman,et al.  Biomechanical response of the pediatric abdomen, part 1: development of an experimental model and quantification of structural response to dynamic belt loading. , 2006, Stapp car crash journal.

[2]  Michael S. Jaffee,et al.  Computational biology — Modeling of primary blast effects on the central nervous system , 2009, NeuroImage.

[3]  J. Bonet,et al.  A simple average nodal pressure tetrahedral element for incompressible and nearly incompressible dynamic explicit applications , 1998 .

[4]  William C Moss,et al.  Skull flexure from blast waves: a mechanism for brain injury with implications for helmet design. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[5]  Z. Bažant,et al.  SPURIOUS REFLECTION OF ELASTIC WAVES IN NONUNIFORM FINITE ELEMENT GRIDS , 1978 .

[6]  Kevin Williams,et al.  Finite Element Modeling for the Prediction of Blast Trauma , 2005 .

[7]  Martin Davis,et al.  A Methodology for Assessing Blast Protection in Explosive Ordnance Disposal Bomb Suits , 2005, International journal of occupational safety and ergonomics : JOSE.

[8]  Paul A Taylor,et al.  Simulation of blast-induced early-time intracranial wave physics leading to traumatic brain injury. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[9]  M. Ziejewski,et al.  Biomechanical Assessment of Brain Dynamic Responses Due to Blast Pressure Waves , 2010, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[10]  J. Anderson,et al.  Modern Compressible Flow: With Historical Perspective , 1982 .

[11]  David F. Moore,et al.  In silico investigation of intracranial blast mitigation with relevance to military traumatic brain injury , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  R. Willinger,et al.  Shear Properties of Brain Tissue over a Frequency Range Relevant for Automotive Impact Situations: New Experimental Results. , 2004, Stapp car crash journal.

[13]  D. R. Richmond,et al.  ESTIMATE OF MAN'S TOLERANCE TO THE DIRECT EFFECTS OF AIR BLAST , 1968 .

[14]  U. Ghia,et al.  Procedure for Estimation and Reporting of Uncertainty Due to Discretization in CFD Applications , 2007 .

[15]  King H. Yang,et al.  Development of numerical models for injury biomechanics research: a review of 50 years of publications in the Stapp Car Crash Conference. , 2006, Stapp car crash journal.

[16]  Andrew M. Lennon,et al.  Modeling the Effects of Blast on the Human Thorax Using High Strain Rate Viscoelastic Properties of Human Tissue , 2005 .

[17]  E. S. Gurdjian,et al.  Studies on mechanical impedance of the human skull: preliminary report. , 1970, Journal of biomechanics.

[18]  Cameron R Bass,et al.  Pulmonary injury risk assessment for short-duration blasts. , 2008, The Journal of trauma.