Turbopump condition monitoring using incremental clustering and one-class support vector machine

: Turbopump condition monitoring is a significant approach to ensure the safety of liquid rocket engine (LRE). Because of lack of fault samples, a monitoring system cannot be trained on all possible condition patterns. Thus it is important to differentiate abnormal or unknown patterns from normal pattern with novelty detection methods. One-class support vector machine (OCSVM) that has been commonly used for novelty detection cannot deal well with large scale samples. In order to model the normal pattern of the turbopump with OCSVM and so as to monitor the condition of the turbopump, a monitoring method that integrates OCSVM with incremental clustering is presented. In this method, the incremental clustering is used for sample reduction by extracting representative vectors from a large training set. The representative vectors are supposed to distribute uniformly in the object region and fulfill the region. And training OCSVM on these representative vectors yields a novelty detector. By applying this method to the analysis of the turbopump’s historical test data, it shows that the incremental clustering algorithm can extract 91 representative points from more than 36 000 training vectors, and the OCSVM detector trained on these 91 representative points can recognize spikes in vibration signals caused by different abnormal events such as vane shedding, rub-impact and sensor faults. This monitoring method does not need fault samples during training as classical recognition methods. The method resolves the learning problem of large samples and is an alternative method for condition monitoring of the LRE turbopump

[1]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Support Vector Method for Novelty Detection , 1999, NIPS.

[2]  Nello Cristianini,et al.  An Introduction to Support Vector Machines and Other Kernel-based Learning Methods , 2000 .

[3]  Bo-Suk Yang,et al.  Support vector machine in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis , 2007 .

[4]  Keith Worden,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL VALIDATION OF A STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING METHODOLOGY: PART I. NOVELTY DETECTION ON A LABORATORY STRUCTURE , 2003 .

[5]  Lei Hu Online Fault Detection Algorithm Based on Double-threshold OCSVM and Its Application , 2009 .

[6]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  The analysis of decomposition methods for support vector machines , 2000, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks Learn. Syst..

[7]  Chandan Srivastava,et al.  Support Vector Data Description , 2011 .

[8]  Arthur Gretton,et al.  An online support vector machine for abnormal events detection , 2006, Signal Process..

[9]  Lionel Tarassenko,et al.  Static and dynamic novelty detection methods for jet engine health monitoring , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[10]  Simon Haykin,et al.  An explicit algorithm for training support vector machines , 1999, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[11]  B. Ripley,et al.  Pattern Recognition , 1968, Nature.

[12]  Qin Guo-jun Support vector machines detection method for turbopump test data analysis , 2008 .

[13]  Victoria J. Hodge,et al.  A Survey of Outlier Detection Methodologies , 2004, Artificial Intelligence Review.

[14]  Sameer Singh,et al.  Novelty detection: a review - part 1: statistical approaches , 2003, Signal Process..

[15]  J. Platt Sequential Minimal Optimization : A Fast Algorithm for Training Support Vector Machines , 1998 .

[16]  Sameer Singh,et al.  Novelty detection: a review - part 2: : neural network based approaches , 2003, Signal Process..