Geographic variation and localised clustering of congenital anomalies in Great Britain

BackgroundEnvironmental pollution as a cause of congenital anomalies is sometimes suspected because of clustering of anomalies in areas of higher exposure. This highlights questions around spatial heterogeneity (clustering) in congenital anomaly rates. If spatial variation is endemic, then any one specific cluster is less remarkable, though the presence of uncontrolled geographically clustered risk factors is suggested. If rates are relatively homogeneous across space other than around specific hazards, then evidence for these hazards causing the clusters is strengthened. We sought to estimate the extent of spatial heterogeneity in congenital anomaly rates in the United Kingdom.MethodsThe study population covered about one million births from five registers in Britain from 1991–1999. We estimated heterogeneity across four geographical levels: register area, hospital catchment, electoral ward, and enumeration district, using a negative binomial regression model. We also sought clusters using a circular scan statistic.ResultsCongenital anomaly rates clearly varied across register areas and hospital catchments (p < 0.001), but not below this level (p > 0.2). Adjusting for socioeconomic deprivation and maternal age made little difference to the extent of geographical variation for most congenital anomaly subtypes. The two most significant circular clusters (of four ano-rectal atresias and six congenital heart diseases) contained two or more siblings.ConclusionThe variation in rates between registers and hospital catchment area may have resulted in part from differences in case ascertainment, and this should be taken into account in geographical epidemiological studies of environmental exposures. The absence of evidence for variation below this level should be interpreted cautiously in view of the low power of general heterogeneity tests. Nevertheless, the data suggest that strong localised clusters in congenital anomalies are uncommon, so clusters around specific putative environmental hazards are remarkable when observed. Negative binomial models applied at successive hierarchical levels provide an approach of intermediate complexity to characterising geographical heterogeneity.

[1]  M. Cedergren,et al.  Chlorination byproducts and nitrate in drinking water and risk for congenital cardiac defects. , 2002, Environmental research.

[2]  J. Rankin,et al.  Congenital anterior abdominal wall defects in the North of England, 1986–1996: occurrence and outcome , 1999, Prenatal diagnosis.

[3]  P. Boyd,et al.  An aetiological classification of birth defects for epidemiological research , 2005, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[4]  M. Vrijheid,et al.  Prevalence of congenital anomalies in five British regions, 1991–99 , 2005, Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition.

[5]  J Wakefield,et al.  Risk of adverse birth outcomes in populations living near landfill sites , 2001, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  S. Goldberg,et al.  An association of human congenital cardiac malformations and drinking water contaminants. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[7]  M. Goldberg,et al.  Low birth weight and preterm births among infants born to women living near a municipal solid waste landfill site in Montreal, Quebec. , 1995, Environmental research.

[8]  M. Kilby,et al.  Congenital anterior abdominal wall defects in England and Wales 1987–93: retrospective analysis of OPCS data , 1996, BMJ.

[9]  G. Shaw,et al.  Congenital cardiac anomalies in relation to water contamination, Santa Clara County, California, 1981-1983. , 1989, American journal of epidemiology.

[10]  B. Källén,et al.  Drinking water chlorination and delivery outcome-a registry-based study in Sweden. , 2000, Reproductive toxicology.

[11]  P. Pemberton,et al.  Rising incidence of gastroschisis in teenage pregnancies. , 1997, The Journal of maternal-fetal medicine.

[12]  V. Carstairs Multiple deprivation and health state. , 1981, Community medicine.

[13]  G. Shaw,et al.  Trihalomethane Exposures from Municipal Water Supplies and Selected Congenital Malformations , 2003, Epidemiology.

[14]  M Martuzzi,et al.  Estimating the degree of heterogeneity between event rates using likelihood. , 1995, American journal of epidemiology.

[15]  W. F. Athas,et al.  Evaluating cluster alarms: a space-time scan statistic and brain cancer in Los Alamos, New Mexico. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[16]  T. Talbot,et al.  Data quality and the spatial analysis of disease rates: congenital malformations in New York State. , 2002, Health & place.

[17]  M Vrijheid,et al.  Risk of congenital anomalies near hazardous-waste landfill sites in Europe: the EUROHAZCON study , 1998, The Lancet.

[18]  L. Chitty,et al.  Congenital anterior abdominal wall defects , 1996, BMJ.

[19]  B. Källén,et al.  A study of pregnancy outcome in a small area around a chemical factory and a chemical dump. , 1985, Environmental research.