Predicting Long-Term Global Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury: Development of a Practical Prognostic Tool Using the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database

Abstract For patients surviving serious traumatic brain injury (TBI), families and other stakeholders often desire information on long-term functional prognosis, but accurate and easy-to-use clinical tools are lacking. We aimed to build utilitarian decision trees from commonly collected clinical variables to predict Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) functional levels at 1, 2, and 5 years after moderate-to-severe closed TBI. Flexible classification tree statistical modeling was used on prospectively collected data from the TBI-Model Systems (TBIMS) inception cohort study. Enrollments occurred at 17 designated, or previously designated, TBIMS inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Analysis included all participants with nonpenetrating TBI injured between January 1997 and January 2017. Sample sizes were 10,125 (year-1), 8,821 (year-2), and 6,165 (year-5) after cross-sectional exclusions (death, vegetative state, insufficient post-injury time, and unavailable outcome). In our final models, post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) duration consistently dominated branching hierarchy and was the lone injury characteristic significantly contributing to GOS predictability. Lower-order variables that added predictability were age, pre-morbid education, productivity, and occupational category. Generally, patient outcomes improved with shorter PTA, younger age, greater pre-morbid productivity, and higher pre-morbid vocational or educational achievement. Across all prognostic groups, the best and worst good recovery rates were 65.7% and 10.9%, respectively, and the best and worst severe disability rates were 3.9% and 64.1%. Predictability in test data sets ranged from C-statistic of 0.691 (year-1; confidence interval [CI], 0.675, 0.711) to 0.731 (year-2; CI, 0.724, 0.738). In conclusion, we developed a clinically useful tool to provide prognostic information on long-term functional outcomes for adult survivors of moderate and severe closed TBI. Predictive accuracy for GOS level was demonstrated in an independent test sample. Length of PTA, a clinical marker of injury severity, was by far the most critical outcome determinant.

[1]  N. Andelic,et al.  The trajectories of overall disability in the first 5 years after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury , 2017, Brain injury.

[2]  L. Dreer,et al.  Resilience Following Traumatic Brain Injury: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study. , 2016, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  Jeffrey P. Cuthbert,et al.  Ten-Year Employment Patterns of Working Age Individuals After Moderate to Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study. , 2015, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  M. Brandstater,et al.  Effects of Patient Preinjury and Injury Characteristics on Acute Rehabilitation Outcomes for Traumatic Brain Injury. , 2015, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  D. Stein,et al.  Prognostication of Mortality and Long term Functional Outcomes Following Traumatic Brain Injury: Can We Do Better? , 2015, Journal of neurotrauma.

[6]  K. Dams-O’Connor,et al.  Global Outcome Trajectories After TBI Among Survivors and Nonsurvivors: A National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study , 2015, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[7]  D. McClish,et al.  Global Outcome and Late Seizures After Penetrating Versus Closed Traumatic Brain Injury: A NIDRR TBI Model Systems Study , 2015, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[8]  Jeffrey P. Cuthbert,et al.  Unemployment in the United States After Traumatic Brain Injury for Working-Age Individuals: Prevalence and Associated Factors 2 Years Postinjury , 2015, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[9]  Jeffrey P. Cuthbert,et al.  US Population Estimates of Health and Social Outcomes 5 Years After Rehabilitation for Traumatic Brain Injury , 2014, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[10]  K. Dams-O’Connor,et al.  Longitudinal description of the glasgow outcome scale-extended for individuals in the traumatic brain injury model systems national database: a National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research traumatic brain injury model systems study. , 2013, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[11]  E. Agranov,et al.  Cognitive Reserve Components as Expressed in Traumatic Brain Injury , 2013, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[12]  Jeffrey P. Cuthbert,et al.  Extension of the Representativeness of the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database: 2001 to 2010 , 2012, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[13]  Jeffrey P. Cuthbert,et al.  Representativeness of the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Database , 2012, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[14]  H. Lefebvre,et al.  The close relatives of people who have had a traumatic brain injury and their special needs , 2012, Brain injury.

[15]  W. Walker,et al.  A multicentre study on the clinical utility of post-traumatic amnesia duration in predicting global outcome after moderate-severe traumatic brain injury , 2009, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[16]  J. Corrigan,et al.  Reliability and Predictive Validity of the Ohio State University TBI Identification Method With Prisoners , 2009, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[17]  D. Menon Unique challenges in clinical trials in traumatic brain injury , 2009, Critical care medicine.

[18]  Wade R. Smith,et al.  Pharmacology of Traumatic Brain Injury: Where Is the “Golden Bullet”? , 2008, Molecular medicine.

[19]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  A systematic review finds methodological improvements necessary for prognostic models in determining traumatic brain injury outcomes. , 2008, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[20]  J. Corrigan,et al.  Initial Reliability and Validity of the Ohio State University TBI Identification Method , 2007, The journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[21]  T. Nick,et al.  Comparison of indices of traumatic brain injury severity: Glasgow Coma Scale, length of coma and post-traumatic amnesia , 2007, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry.

[22]  T. Novack,et al.  Occupational categories and return to work after traumatic brain injury: a multicenter study. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[23]  Ewout W Steyerberg,et al.  Some prognostic models for traumatic brain injury were not valid. , 2006, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[24]  Allen W. Brown,et al.  Clinical elements that predict outcome after traumatic brain injury: a prospective multicenter recursive partitioning (decision-tree) analysis. , 2005, Journal of neurotrauma.

[25]  T. Nick,et al.  Race and Productivity Outcome After Traumatic Brain Injury: Influence of Confounding Factors , 2003, The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation.

[26]  T. Osler,et al.  Improving the Glasgow Coma Scale score: motor score alone is a better predictor. , 2003, The Journal of trauma.

[27]  Marcel Dijkers,et al.  Systematic bias in traumatic brain injury outcome studies because of loss to follow-up. , 2003, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  Vincent Corruble,et al.  Predicting recovery in patients suffering from traumatic brain injury by using admission variables and physiological data: a comparison between decision tree analysis and logistic regression. , 2002, Journal of neurosurgery.

[29]  Wilson Jt Assessing outcome in head injury trials. , 2001 .

[30]  Hyunjoong Kim,et al.  Classification Trees With Unbiased Multiway Splits , 2001 .

[31]  G. Teasdale,et al.  Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. , 1998, Journal of neurotrauma.

[32]  K. Hall,et al.  Descriptive Findings from the Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems National Data Base , 1996 .

[33]  M. Alexander,et al.  Traumatic Brain Injury: Predicting Course of Recovery and Outcome for Patients Admitted to Rehabilitation , 1994 .

[34]  A. Marmarou,et al.  Prediction tree for severely head-injured patients. , 1991, Journal of neurosurgery.

[35]  H. Schouten,et al.  Agreement between physicians on assessment of outcome following severe head injury. , 1983, Journal of neurosurgery.

[36]  B. Jennett,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF OUTCOME AFTER SEVERE BRAIN DAMAGE A Practical Scale , 1975, The Lancet.

[37]  D. Cahalan,et al.  American drinking practices: summary of findings from a national probability sample. II. Measurement of massed versus spaced drinking. , 1968, Quarterly journal of studies on alcohol.

[38]  S. West Substance use among persons with traumatic brain injury: a review. , 2011, NeuroRehabilitation.

[39]  Stanley Lemeshow,et al.  Applied Logistic Regression, Second Edition , 1989 .