Learning Tasks, Peer Interaction, and Cognition Process An Online Collaborative Design Model

This paper illustrates a model for Online Group Collaborative Learning. The authors based the foundation of the Online Collaborative Design Model upon Piaget’s concepts of assimilation and accommodation, and Vygotsky’s theory of social interaction. The four components of online collaborative learning include: individual processes, the task(s) students work on, group member processes, and communication media. These elements become key components beginning with the theoretical framework, the models used, and implementation of the models. The purpose of this paper is to describe the Online Collaborative Design Model and student feedback related to its implementation in an online course. The model was piloted in a required multimedia graduate course using a problem-based learning approach. Students used synchronous chat rooms and asynchronous discussion boards for course discussions and for the final group project. The instructor, to gain an understanding of the piloted implementation of the Online Collaborative Design Model, gathered final reflections about collaboration and the final project. The reflections revealed that students sensed a connection between productivity and trust. Further research into the impact trust has on the interpersonal communications of the group and the intrapersonal communications of the individual would give interesting insights into the model.

[1]  Brigid Barron When Smart Groups Fail , 2003 .

[2]  Ke Zhang,et al.  Peer Online Discourse Analysis. , 2001 .

[3]  J. Sweller COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[4]  Michael Callaghan,et al.  Tying models of learning to design of collaborative learning software tools , 2002, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[5]  Barbara A. Frey,et al.  Distinctive Distance Education Design: Models for Differentiated Instruction , 2010 .

[6]  Lawrence A. Tomei Information Communication Technologies for Enhanced Education and Learning: Advanced Applications and Developments , 2008 .

[7]  Li Zhang,et al.  Towards a Semantic-Based Approach for Affect and Metaphor Detection , 2013, Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol..

[8]  P. S. Fry,et al.  Interaction among Dimensions of Academic Motivation and Classroom Social Climate: A Study of the Perceptions of Junior High and High School Pupils. , 1980 .

[9]  Dawn Hathaway,et al.  Exploring Two Teacher Education Online Learning Designs , 2008 .

[10]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  A development research agenda for online collaborative learning , 2004 .

[11]  Marwin Britto An exploratory study of the development of a survey instrument to measure the pedagogical dimensions of web-based instruction , 2002 .

[12]  Gulsun Kurubacak,et al.  Meta-Communication for Reflective Online Conversations: Models for Distance Education , 2011 .

[13]  Rachael Knight,et al.  Encyclopedia of Distance Learning , 2005 .

[14]  S. Volet,et al.  High-Level Co-Regulation in Collaborative Learning: How Does It Emerge and How Is It Sustained?. , 2009 .

[15]  Hussein M. Abdel-Wahab,et al.  The Essential Elements of Interactive Multimedia Distance Learning Systems , 2003, Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol..

[16]  Eva Lindgren,et al.  Plagiarism : Catalysts and not so simple solutions , 2014 .

[17]  Maria Bannert,et al.  Exploring regulatory processes during a computer-supported collaborative learning task using process mining , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[18]  Christine Howe,et al.  Collaborative Group Work in Middle Childhood , 2009, Human Development.

[19]  M. Valcke,et al.  Structuring asynchronous discussion groups: Comparing scripting by assigning roles with regulation by cross-age peer tutors , 2010 .

[20]  Lena Wilhelmson,et al.  Competent Web Dialogues: Text-Based Linking of Thoughts. , 2008 .

[21]  Qun Jin,et al.  Intelligent Learning Systems and Advancements in Computer-Aided Instruction: Emerging Studies , 2011 .

[22]  Kyle L. Peck,et al.  The Effects of Peer-Controlled or Moderated Online Collaboration on Group Problem Solving and Related Attitudes , 2003 .

[23]  Jonathan C. Hilpert,et al.  Collaborative Learning in Engineering Students: Gender and Achievement , 2011 .

[24]  Vance A. Durrington,et al.  Strategies for Enhancing Student Interactivity in an Online Environment , 2006 .

[25]  K. Jehn A qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in , 1997 .

[26]  Susan G. Straus,et al.  All in due time: The development of trust in computer-mediated and face-to-face teams , 2006 .

[27]  John G. Hedberg,et al.  Ensuring quality E‐Learning: creating engaging tasks , 2003 .

[28]  Vance A. Durrington,et al.  Relationship between Students' Motivation and their Participation in Asynchronous Online Discussions , 2011 .

[29]  Pei-Di Shen,et al.  The Effects of Web-Enabled Self-Regulated Learning and Problem-Based Learning with Initiation on Students' Computing Skills , 2009, Int. J. Inf. Commun. Technol. Educ..

[30]  Selma Vonderwell,et al.  An examination of asynchronous communication experiences and perspectives of students in an online course: a case study , 2003, Internet High. Educ..

[31]  Mike Moore,et al.  Editorial: Distance education theory , 1991 .

[32]  Koun-Tem Sun,et al.  A Distance Learning System for Teaching the Writing of Chinese Characters over the Internet , 2004, Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol..

[33]  Bonnie L. MacGregor Rubrics as an Assessment Tool in Distance Education , 2009 .

[34]  Yu J. Zhang On the Design and Application of an Online Web Course for Distance Learning , 2004, Int. J. Distance Educ. Technol..

[35]  A. Hare,et al.  Types of Roles in Small Groups , 1994 .