Psychophysics of remembering.

We present a new model of remembering in the context of conditional discrimination. For procedures such as delayed matching to sample, the effect of the sample stimuli at the time of remembering is represented by a pair of Thurstonian (normal) distributions of effective stimulus values. The critical assumption of the model is that, based on prior experience, each effective stimulus value is associated with a ratio of reinforcers obtained for previous correct choices of the comparison stimuli. That ratio determines the choice that is made on the basis of the matching law. The standard deviations of the distributions are assumed to increase with increasing retention-interval duration, and the distance between their means is assumed to be a function of other factors that influence overall difficulty of the discrimination. It is a behavioral model in that choice is determined by its reinforcement history. The model predicts that the biasing effects of the reinforcer differential increase with decreasing discriminability and with increasing retention-interval duration. Data from several conditions using a delayed matching-to-sample procedure with pigeons support the predictions.

[1]  B. Murdock.  Signal-detection theory and short-term memory. , 1965, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Stephen W. Link,et al.  Rediscovering the Past: Gustav Fechner and Signal Detection Theory , 1994 .

[3]  J. Fetterman.  Dimensions of stimulus complexity. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[4]  R. Luce,et al.  Thurstone and Sensory Scaling : Then and Now , 2004 .

[5]  T. Parks.  Signal-detectability theory of recognition-memory performance. , 1966, Psychological review.

[6]  M C Davison,et al.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory. , 1978, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[7]  M. Davison,et al.  The matching law: A research review. , 1988 .

[8]  R. Herrnstein.  On the law of effect. , 1970, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[9]  William A. Roberts,et al.  Short-term memory in the pigeon: Effects of repetition and spacing. , 1972 .

[10]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[11]  K G White,et al.  Characteristics of forgetting functions in delayed matching to sample. , 1985, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[12]  P. Kop.  Reinforcement, choice and response strength , 1990 .

[13]  Fetterman Jg.  Dimensions of stimulus complexity. , 1996 .

[14]  A. Yonelinas.  Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: evidence for a dual-process model. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  J. Nevin,et al.  Effects of signaled reinforcer magnitude on delayed matching-to-sample performance , 1990 .

[16]  K. White,et al.  Consequences of remembering: Independence of performance at different retention levels. , 1996 .

[17]  John A. Nevin,et al.  SIGNAL DETECTION THEORY AND OPERANT BEHAVIOR: A Review of David M. Green and John A. Swets' Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics.1 , 1969 .

[18]  D. Mccarthy,et al.  The interaction between stimulus and reinforcer control on remembering. , 1991, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[19]  K. White,et al.  Temporal constraint on choice: Sensitivity and bias in multiple schedules. , 1983, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[20]  R Ratcliff,et al.  Empirical generality of data from recognition memory receiver-operating characteristic functions and implications for the global memory models. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  C D Creelman,et al.  ROC curves for discrimination of linear extent. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[22]  J T Wixted,et al.  Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior Nonhuman Short-te4?m Memory: a Quantitative Reanalysis of Selected Findings , 2022 .

[23]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Reflections of the Environment in Memory Form of the Memory Functions , 2022 .

[24]  K. White,et al.  On two effects of signaling the consequences for remembering , 1995 .

[25]  L. Thurstone.  A law of comparative judgment. , 1994 .

[26]  William P. Banks,et al.  Signal detection theory and human memory. , 1970 .

[27]  Ewart A. C. Thomas,et al.  Probability matching as a basis for detection and recognition decisions. , 1970 .

[28]  M. Davison,et al.  Effects of varying stimulus disparity and the reinforcer ratio in concurrent-schedule and signal-detection procedures. , 1991, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[29]  D. M. Green,et al.  Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .

[30]  Eugene Galanter,et al.  Handbook of mathematical psychology: I. , 1963 .

[31]  W M Baum,et al.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching. , 1974, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[32]  D. Blough.  Context reinforcement degrades discriminative control: a memory approach. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[33]  J. Nevin,et al.  Effects of differences between stimuli, responses, and reinforcer rates on conditional discrimination performance. , 1993, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[34]  J. Wixted,et al.  On the Form of Forgetting , 1991 .

[35]  S S Stevens,et al.  To Honor Fechner and Repeal His Law: A power function, not a log function, describes the operating characteristic of a sensory system. , 1961, Science.

[36]  J. Wixted,et al.  Memory for Asymmetric Events , 1996 .

[37]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Learning and Memory: An Integrated Approach , 1994 .

[38]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: applications to dementia and amnesia. , 1988, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[39]  K. White,et al.  Sample-stimulus discriminability and sensitivity to reinforcement in delayed matching to sample. , 1992, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[40]  D. Mccarthy,et al.  Delayed matching-to-sample performance: Effects of relative reinforcer frequency and of signaled versus unsignaled reinforcer magnitudes. , 1995, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[41]  A. E. Dusoir,et al.  Treatments of bias in detection and recognition models: A review , 1975 .

[42]  Bennet B. Murdock,et al.  Memory and the theory of signal detection. , 1970 .

[43]  J. Wixted.  A Signal Detection Analysis of Memory for Nonoccurrence in Pigeons , 1993 .

[44]  M. Kubovy,et al.  Probability matching and the formation of conservative decision rules in a numerical analog of signal detection. , 1981 .

[45]  Ewart A. C. Thomas.  Criterion adjustment and probability matching , 1975 .

[46]  K. White.  Conjoint control of performance in conditional discriminations by successive and simultaneous stimuli. , 1986, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[47]  James P. Egan,et al.  Signal detection theory and ROC analysis , 1975 .

[48]  G. Fechner.  Elemente der Psychophysik , 1998 .

[49]  K. White,et al.  Sources of proactive interference in animal memory. , 1988 .