Effects of wide dynamic-range compression on the perceived clarity of individual musical instruments.

The effects of wide-dynamic-range compression (WDRC) on the ability of hearing-impaired subjects to hear out individual instruments or voices (called "sources") in a mixture were explored. On each trial, the subjects were asked to judge the relative clarity of the target in two repetitions of the same music excerpt (mixture of sources) that were processed in different ways. The stimuli were processed via a five-channel simulated WDRC hearing aid, using individual insertion gains and compression ratios recommended by the CAM2 fitting procedure. Both fast- and slow-acting WDRC and a condition with linear amplification and frequency-response shaping were used. To investigate the role of cross-modulation (the partial correlation of the envelopes of different sources caused by the time-varying gain applied by the compressor), conditions were included where the sounds from different sources were compressed before being added together and where the sounds were added together before being compressed. The results showed no effect of cross-modulation, lower clarity with WDRC than with linear amplification, and no significant overall effect of compression speed, although some subjects consistently rated clarity as greater with slow compression. The deleterious effect of WDRC may be related to changes in temporal-envelope shape or reduced spectral contrast produced by WDRC.

[1]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  New Version of the TEN Test With Calibrations in dB HL , 2004, Ear and hearing.

[2]  L. V. Noorden Temporal coherence in the perception of tone sequences , 1975 .

[3]  Mark B. Gardner,et al.  The Dependence of Hearing Impairment on Sound Intensity , 1937 .

[4]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Auditory streaming based on temporal structure in hearing-impaired listeners , 2004, Hearing Research.

[5]  B C Moore,et al.  A comparison of behind-the-ear high-fidelity linear hearing aids and two-channel compression aids, in the laboratory and in everyday life. , 1983, British journal of audiology.

[6]  A S Bregman,et al.  The influence of different timbre attributes on the perceptual segregation of complex-tone sequences. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  E. Fowler,et al.  A METHOD FOR THE EARLY DETECTION OF OTOSCLEROSIS: A STUDY OF SOUNDS WELL ABOVE THRESHOLD , 1936 .

[8]  B. Moore,et al.  Effects of compression and onset/offset asynchronies on the detection of one tone in the presence of another. , 2014, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  B. Moore,et al.  Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  P. Iverson,et al.  Auditory stream segregation by musical timbre: effects of static and dynamic acoustic attributes. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Determination of Preferred Parameters for Multichannel Compression Using Individually Fitted Simulated Hearing Aids and Paired Comparisons , 2011, Ear and hearing.

[12]  James M Kates,et al.  Music Preferences With Hearing Aids: Effects of Signal Properties, Compression Settings, and Listener Characteristics , 2014, Ear and hearing.

[13]  A. Duquesnoy Effect of a single interfering noise or speech source upon the binaural sentence intelligibility of aged persons. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  Jeremy Marozeau,et al.  The Effect of Timbre and Loudness on Melody Segregation , 2013 .

[15]  R. Plomp Noise, Amplification, and Compression: Considerations of Three Main Issues in Hearing Aid Design , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[16]  Marshall Chasin,et al.  Some characteristics of amplified music through hearing aids , 2014, Hearing Research.

[17]  R. Plomp,et al.  Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  C. Krumhansl,et al.  Isolating the dynamic attributes of musical timbre. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  V Pluvinage,et al.  Evaluation of a dual-channel full dynamic range compression system for people with sensorineural hearing loss. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[20]  B. Moore,et al.  Quantifying the effects of fast-acting compression on the envelope of speech. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  Music and Hearing Aids , 2014, Trends in hearing.

[22]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Side effects of fast-acting dynamic range compression that affect intelligibility in a competing speech task. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Effect of spatial separation, extended bandwidth, and compression speed on intelligibility in a competing-speech task. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Christian Füllgrabe,et al.  Multichannel Fast-Acting Dynamic Range Compression Hinders Performance by Young, Normal-Hearing Listeners in a Two-Talker Separation Task* , 2009 .

[25]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Development of a new method for deriving initial fittings for hearing aids with multi-channel compression: CAMEQ2-HF , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[26]  David Fabry,et al.  Speech and music quality ratings for linear and nonlinear hearing aid circuitry. , 2007, Journal of american academy of audiology.

[27]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  Effects of spectro-temporal modulation changes produced by multi-channel compression on intelligibility in a competing-speech task. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  The Choice of Compression Speed in Hearing Aids: Theoretical and Practical Considerations and the Role of Individual Differences , 2008, Trends in amplification.

[29]  Brian C J Moore,et al.  False air-bone gaps at 4 kHz in listeners with normal hearing and sensorineural hearing loss , 2013, International journal of audiology.

[30]  T Houtgast,et al.  Compression and expansion of the temporal envelope: evaluation of speech intelligibility and sound quality. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  C. Darwin,et al.  Spectral integration based on common amplitude modulation , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[32]  Brian C. J. Moore,et al.  The Effect of Nonlinear Distortion on the Perceived Quality of Music and Speech Signals , 2003 .