Autonomic Response Specificity

&NA; Responses for eight ANS variables are reported for 30 male college students under four stimulus conditions in an investigation of individual response specificity and stereotypy. It was found that neither direction nor magnitude of reaction was significantly related to prestimulus level for any of the untransformed variables. Reactivity in this study was based, therefore, upon raw score changes, except for the customary transformation‐‐"log palmar conductance change." Eight (27 per cent) of the subjects showed complete response specificity by response‐level scoring (i.e., maximal activation occurred in the same variable under the four stimulus conditions). Only 2 (7 per cent) showed complete specificity by reactivity scoring, a result not significantly different from chance. A tendency toward response stereotypy (i.e., a stable hierarchy in autonomic response patterns to different stimuli) was found to occur under both methods of scoring, but to be much greater in responselevel scoring, whereby 22 subjects (73 per cent) demonstrated coefficients of concordance at or beyond the.01 level of confidence. For reactivity scoring only 4 (13 per cent) satisfied this criterion. Response specificity and stereotypy, when they occur, are interpreted as caused in part by method of measurement and in part by significant individual differences in resting ANS functions. A word of caution is included against overgeneralizing their significance.

[1]  J. Lacey,et al.  Autonomic Response Specificity and Rorschach Color Responses , 1952 .

[2]  P. Theron.  Peripheral Vasomotor Reactions as Indices of Basic Emotional Tension and Lability , 1948, Psychosomatic medicine.

[3]  D. Lindsley.  Physiological psychology. , 1956, Annual review of psychology.

[4]  C. Shagass,et al.  Symptom Specificity and Bodily Reactions During Psychiatric Interview , 1950, Psychosomatic medicine.

[5]  J. E. Finesinger,et al.  ELECTRICAL RESISTANCE OF THE SKIN: Effect of Size of Electrodes, Exercise and Cutaneous Hydration , 1946 .

[6]  C. P. Richter.  Instructions for using the cutaneous resistance recorder, or dermometer, on peripheral nerve injuries, sympathectomies and paravertebral blocks. , 1946, Journal of neurosurgery.

[7]  Chester W. Darrow,et al.  The Equation of the Galvanic Skin Reflex Curve: I. The Dynamics of Reaction in Relation to Excitation-Background , 1937 .

[8]  J. Lacey,et al.  Individual differences in somatic response patterns. , 1950, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[9]  B. C. Lacey,et al.  Verification and extension of the principle of autonomic response-stereotypy. , 1958, The American journal of psychology.

[10]  G. Zajicek,et al.  The Wisdom of the Body , 1934, Nature.

[11]  C. Shagass,et al.  Physiologic Study of Symptom Mechanisms in Psychiatric Patients Under Stress , 1949, Psychosomatic medicine.

[12]  S. Warson.  Psychosomatic Medicine: Its Principles and Applications , 1951, Pediatrics.

[13]  M. Washburn,et al.  Bodily Changes in Pain, Hunger, Fear, and Rage. , 1917 .

[14]  H. Schlosberg,et al.  A simple test of the normality of twenty-four distributions of electrical skin conductance. , 1953, Science.