Environmental assessment of present and future marine fuels

Our globalised world is connected by shipping, an industry powered by one of heaviest and dirtiest products of refining: heavy fuel oil. Tougher environmental regulations are now challenging the industry to take action. Ship-owners and operators are faced with the choice of installing exhaust gas cleaning technologies or switching to a different fuel altogether. The primary purpose of this thesis was to assess the environmental performance of present and future marine fuels and to evaluate potential methods and tools for their assessment. Two different system approaches are used in this study: life cycle assessment (LCA) and global energy systems modelling. LCA is a well-established method for assessing the environmental performance of fuels. This type of assessment was complemented with the use of the Global Energy Transition (GET) model to investigate cost-effective fuel choices based on a global stabilisation of CO2 emissions and the global competition for primary energy sources. The GET model includes all energy sectors and considers the interactions among them, but it is limited in scope to CO2 emissions and costs. The LCAs involve a holistic systems perspective that includes the entire life cycle and various types of environmental impacts, but they are limited to analyses of one product or service at a time. These methods provide insights that are both contradictory and complementary. This study concludes that there is substantial potential for reducing the environmental impact of shipping through a change in fuel types and/or the use of exhaust abatement technologies. A switch from heavy fuel oil to any of the alternatives investigated in this study reduces the overall environmental impact of marine fuels. The GET model indicates that it is cost-effective to phase out the use of crude oil-based fuels in the shipping sector and replace these fuels with the use of natural gas-based fuels during the next few decades. Based on the LCA results, the use of biofuels may be one possible way to reduce the impact of shipping on the climate, but biofuels may only be a cost-effective fuel in shipping if the corresponding annual available bioenergy resources are sufficiently large. Three important implications are highlighted: the importance of reducing the NOX emissions from marine engines, the need to regulate the methane slip from gas engines and the fact that a change in fuels may not reduce the impact of shipping on the climate.

[1]  Olivier Jolliet,et al.  Building a model based on scientific consensus for Life Cycle Impact Assessment of chemicals: the search for harmony and parsimony. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  R. Sims,et al.  An overview of current industry and RD&D activities , 2008 .

[3]  Patrik Söderholm,et al.  Modelling the economic costs of climate policy , 2007 .

[4]  Michael Wang,et al.  Well-to-Wheels Analysis of Advanced Fuel/Vehicle Systems — A North American Study of Energy Use, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Criteria Pollutant Emissions , 2005 .

[5]  Dolf Gielen,et al.  Biomass for heat or as transportation fuel? A comparison between two model-based studies , 2007 .

[6]  Stefano Zuin,et al.  Life cycle assessment of ship-generated waste management of Luka Koper. , 2009, Waste management.

[7]  Bengt J Ramne,et al.  Criteria for Future Marine Fuels , 2012 .

[8]  M. Berglund,et al.  Assessment of energy performance in the life-cycle of biogas production , 2006 .

[9]  Karin Andersson,et al.  Environmental Trade-Offs in Nitrogen Oxide Removal from Ship Engine Exhausts , 2011 .

[10]  George H. Clark Industrial and Marine Fuels Reference Book , 1988 .

[11]  T J Wallington,et al.  Fuel and vehicle technology choices for passenger vehicles in achieving stringent CO2 targets: connections between transportation and other energy sectors. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  Donghun Lee,et al.  A study on availability and safety of new propulsion systems for LNG carriers , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Hybrid life-cycle assessment of natural gas based fuel chains for transportation. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[14]  Jean-Paul Hettelingh,et al.  Country-dependent Characterisation Factors for Acidification and Terrestrial Eutrophication Based on Accumulated Exceedance as an Impact Category Indicator (14 pp) , 2006 .

[15]  Mirjana Golušin,et al.  Policy and promotion of sustainable inland waterway transport in Europe ― Danube River , 2011 .

[16]  J. Hunt,et al.  Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences , 2015 .

[17]  Not Indicated,et al.  International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Detailed guidance , 2010 .

[18]  Stefan Lechtenböhmer,et al.  Tapping the leakages: Methane losses, mitigation options and policy issues for Russian long distance gas transmission pipelines , 2007 .

[19]  B. Finlayson‐Pitts,et al.  Chemistry of the Upper and Lower Atmosphere , 2000 .

[20]  Nicolas Tchertchian,et al.  Benefits and limits of a Constraint Satisfaction Problem/Life Cycle Assessment approach for the ecodesign of complex systems: a case applied to a hybrid passenger ferry , 2013 .

[21]  Vicki P. McConnell,et al.  Now, voyager? The increasing marine use of fuel cells , 2010 .

[23]  Pål Börjesson,et al.  Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems—Part I: Fuel-cycle emissions , 2006 .

[24]  Marko P. Hekkert,et al.  Natural gas as an alternative to crude oil in automotive fuel chains well-to-wheel analysis and transition strategy development , 2005 .

[25]  Edwin G. Wiggins,et al.  COGAS propulsion for LNG ships , 2011 .

[26]  Monica Larsson,et al.  An Experimental Study of Fischer-Tropsch Fuels in a Diesel Engine , 2007 .

[27]  Fabio Polonara,et al.  Life-cycle greenhouse gas analysis of LNG as a heavy vehicle fuel in Europe , 2010 .

[28]  Thea Whitman,et al.  Systematic under- and overestimation of GHG reductions in renewable biomass systems , 2011 .

[29]  Spencer C. Sorenson,et al.  Dimethyl Ether in Diesel Engines: Progress and Perspectives , 2001 .

[30]  H. K. Woud,et al.  Design of Propulsion and Electric Power Generation Systems , 2002 .

[31]  Konstantinos Salonitis,et al.  Environmental impact of ship hull repair , 2009 .

[32]  Kristian Lindgren,et al.  Hydrogen or methanol in the transportation sector , 2000 .

[33]  Paulina Jaramillo,et al.  Comparative analysis of the production costs and life-cycle GHG emissions of FT liquid fuels from coal and natural gas. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[34]  Aliki Georgakaki,et al.  Liquefied natural gas for Europe: some important issues for consideration , 2009 .

[35]  Sten Karlsson,et al.  Cost-effective energy carriers for transport – The role of the energy supply system in a carbon-constrained world , 2010 .

[36]  Franklin Farell Roadmap to a Single European Transport Area: Towards a competitive and resource efficient transport system , 2014 .

[37]  J. E. Sinor Comparison of CNG and LNG technologies for transportation applications , 1992 .

[38]  Subhes C. Bhattacharyya,et al.  A review of energy system models , 2010 .

[39]  Ø. Endresen,et al.  Cost-effectiveness assessment of CO2 reducing measures in shipping , 2009 .

[40]  M Prinĉaud,et al.  Developing a tool for environmental impact assessment and eco-design for ships , 2010 .

[41]  Wout Dullaert,et al.  Transformations in gas shipping: Market structure and efficiency , 2010 .

[42]  C. Guedes Soares,et al.  Modelling of environmental impacts of ship dismantling , 2011 .

[43]  Mark Abkowitz,et al.  Insights on the Use of Hybrid Life Cycle Assessment for Environmental Footprinting , 2011 .

[44]  R. Verbeek,et al.  Global Assessment of Dimethyl-Ether: Comparison with Other Fuels , 1997 .

[45]  John B. Heywood,et al.  ON THE ROAD IN 2020 - A LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS OF NEW AUTOMOBILE TECHNOLOGIES , 2000 .

[46]  Monique Hoogwijk,et al.  Chapter 7: Energy resources and potentials , 2012 .

[47]  R. N. Richardson,et al.  Hydrogen fuel in a marine environment , 2007 .

[48]  Larry Bredeson,et al.  Factors driving refinery CO2 intensity, with allocation into products , 2010 .

[49]  Leonardo Barreto,et al.  Automobile technology, hydrogen and climate change: a long term modelling analysis , 2007 .

[50]  John Mcneil,et al.  Glycerine from biodiesel: The perfect diesel fuel , 2012 .

[51]  J. Gómez,et al.  Organizations’ Environmental Performance Indicators: Measuring, Monitoring, and Management , 2013 .

[52]  Robert B. Jackson,et al.  China's growing methanol economy and its implications for energy and the environment , 2012 .

[53]  Timothy J. Wallington,et al.  Impact of biofuel production and other supply and demand factors on food price increases in 2008 , 2011 .

[54]  G. R. Astbury A review of the properties and hazards of some alternative fuels , 2008 .

[55]  Sylvie Cornot-Gandolphe,et al.  THE CHALLENGES OF FURTHER COST REDUCTIONS FOR NEW SUPPLY OPTIONS (PIPELINE, LNG, GTL) , 2003 .

[56]  Fausto Freire,et al.  Life-cycle studies of biodiesel in Europe: A review addressing the variability of results and modeling issues , 2011 .

[57]  Nina Johansson,et al.  Production of liquid biogas, LBG, with cryogenic and conventional upgrading technology - Description of systems and evaluations of energy balances , 2008 .

[58]  Jeroen B. Guinee,et al.  Handbook on life cycle assessment operational guide to the ISO standards , 2002 .

[59]  G. Naterer,et al.  Life cycle assessment of various hydrogen production methods , 2012 .

[60]  Paul S. Fischbeck,et al.  Emissions from Ships , 1997, Science.

[61]  V. Eyring,et al.  Emissions from international shipping: 2. Impact of future technologies on scenarios until 2050 , 2005 .

[62]  J. Potting,et al.  Spatial Differentiation in the Characterisation of Photochemical Ozone Formation: The EDIP2003 Methodology , 2006 .

[63]  Oihane C. Basurko,et al.  Methodology for the sustainability assessment of marine technologies , 2014 .

[64]  K. Boulding General Systems Theory---The Skeleton of Science , 1956 .

[65]  Christos Chryssakis,et al.  CO2 abatement potential towards 2050 for shipping, including alternative fuels , 2013 .

[66]  Erin H. Green,et al.  Mortality from ship emissions: a global assessment. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[67]  T. Notteboom,et al.  The effect of high fuel costs on liner service configuration in container shipping , 2009 .

[68]  Ulrich Eggers,et al.  Lng A Nontechnical Guide , 2016 .

[69]  Bart Degraeuwe,et al.  The impact of international shipping on European air quality and climate forcing , 2013 .

[70]  Bruno Peuportier,et al.  How to account for CO2 emissions from biomass in an LCA , 2007 .

[71]  J. Corbett,et al.  Updated emissions from ocean shipping , 2003 .

[72]  Prasant Kumar Rout,et al.  Production of first and second generation biofuels: A comprehensive review , 2010 .

[73]  U. Lohmann,et al.  Global model simulations of the impact of ocean-going ships on aerosols, clouds, and the radiation budget , 2007 .

[74]  Henrik Salsing DME Combustion in Heavy Duty Diesel Engines , 2011 .

[75]  James J Winebrake,et al.  Emissions Tradeoffs among Alternative Marine Fuels: Total Fuel Cycle Analysis of Residual Oil, Marine Gas Oil, and Marine Diesel Oil , 2008, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[76]  Nsw Roads and Maritime Services Energy and greenhouse , 2014 .

[77]  Kristian Lindgren,et al.  A critical assessment of energy-economy-climate models , 2012 .

[78]  Iftekhar A. Karimi,et al.  Minimizing Boil-Off Losses in Liquefied Natural Gas Transportation , 2009 .

[79]  Alberto Traverso,et al.  Comparative LCA of methanol-fuelled SOFCs as auxiliary power systems on-board ships , 2010 .

[80]  Qiang Wang,et al.  Natural gas from shale formation – The evolution, evidences and challenges of shale gas revolution in United States , 2014 .

[81]  Robert J. Conrado,et al.  Electrofuels: A New Paradigm for Renewable Fuels , 2013 .

[82]  R. H. Williams,et al.  The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply : a review of 17 studies , 2003 .

[83]  R. Plevin Life Cycle Regulation of Transportation Fuels: Uncertainty and its Policy Implications , 2010 .

[84]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  European characterization factors for human health damage of PM10 and ozone in life cycle impact assessment , 2008 .

[85]  S. Godtfredsen,et al.  Ullmann ' s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry , 2017 .

[86]  Michael Wang,et al.  Allocation of energy use in petroleum refineries to petroleum products , 2004 .

[87]  James J Winebrake,et al.  Energy Use and Emissions from Marine Vessels: A Total Fuel Life Cycle Approach , 2007, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[88]  Björn Andersson,et al.  Global energy scenarios meeting stringent CO2 constraints--cost-effective fuel choices in the transportation sector , 2003 .

[89]  O. Jolliet,et al.  The role of atmospheric dispersion models and ecosystem sensitivity in the determination of characterisation factors for acidifying and eutrophying emissions in LCIA , 2008 .

[90]  R. Clift,et al.  Soil Organic Carbon Changes in the Cultivation of Energy Crops: Implications for GHG Balances and Soil Quality for Use in LCA , 2011 .

[91]  Hongrui Ma,et al.  Well-to-wake energy and greenhouse gas analysis of SOX abatement options for the marine industry , 2012 .

[92]  Joël Blin,et al.  Biodegradability of biomass pyrolysis oils: Comparison to conventional petroleum fuels and alternatives fuels in current use , 2007 .

[93]  Vincent Mahieu,et al.  Well-to-wheels analysis of future automotive fuels and powertrains in the european context , 2004 .

[94]  R. Burnett,et al.  Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. , 2002, JAMA.

[95]  Marc Kickulies Fuel cell power for maritime applications , 2005 .

[96]  Walter Klöpffer,et al.  Analytical tools for environmental design and management in a systems perspective , 2012 .

[97]  J. Corbett,et al.  Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Shipping , 2010 .

[98]  Morgan Fröling,et al.  Energy use indicators in energy and life cycle assessments of biofuels: review and recommendations , 2012 .

[99]  Julianne Mari Ryste Screening LCA of GHG emissions related to LNG as ship fuel , 2012 .

[100]  F. Jiménez Espadafor,et al.  The viability of pure vegetable oil as an alternative fuel for large ships , 2009 .

[101]  Erik Fridell,et al.  Ammonia slip measurements on ships with NOX converters. A study of different techniques , 2008 .

[102]  Costs and benefits of LNG as ship fuel for container vessels , 2012 .

[103]  N. Nakicenovic,et al.  Global Energy Perspectives to 2050 and beyond , 1996 .

[104]  Karl Hillman,et al.  Environmental assessment and strategic technology choice: the case of renewable transport fuels , 2008 .

[105]  Göran Berndes,et al.  The contribution of biomass in the future global energy supply: a review of 17 studies , 2003 .

[106]  Hans Hellsmark,et al.  Unfolding the formative phase of gasified biomass in the European Union: The role of system builders in realising the potential of second-generation transportation fuels from biomass , 2010 .

[107]  H. Schlager,et al.  Operation of marine diesel engines on biogenic fuels: modification of emissions and resulting climate effects. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[108]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  The computational structure of life cycle assessment , 2002 .

[109]  Hewu Wang,et al.  Performance of Euro III common rail heavy duty diesel engine fueled with Gas to Liquid , 2009 .

[110]  J. V. Gerpen,et al.  Biodiesel processing and production , 2005 .

[111]  Abdullah M. Aitani,et al.  Oil Refining and Products , 2004 .

[112]  Lars Laugen,et al.  An Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of LNG and HFO as Marine Fuels , 2013 .

[113]  Edeltraud Guenther,et al.  Definition, Conceptualization, and Measurement of Corporate Environmental Performance: A Critical Examination of a Multidimensional Construct , 2015 .

[114]  Kenji Yamaji,et al.  Important roles of Fischer–Tropsch synfuels in the global energy future , 2008 .

[115]  Francesco Baldi,et al.  The influence of propulsion system design on the carbon footprint of different marine fuels , 2013 .

[116]  Gjermund Gravir,et al.  Emission from international sea transportation and environmental impact , 2003 .

[117]  Kelly Hawboldt,et al.  Prediction of natural gas behaviour in loading and unloading operations of marine CNG transportation systems , 2009 .

[118]  S. Dalsøren,et al.  Future cost scenarios for reduction of ship CO2 emissions , 2011 .

[119]  Khalid Rehman Hakeem,et al.  Biomass and Bioenergy , 2014, Springer International Publishing.

[120]  C. Bae,et al.  The potential of di-methyl ether (DME) as an alternative fuel for compression-ignition engines: A review , 2008 .

[121]  T. Gustafsson,et al.  Methodology for calculating emissions from ships: 1. Update of emission factors , 2004 .

[122]  Y Nakamura,et al.  RESEARCH ON METHANOL-FUELED MARINE DIESEL ENGINE , 1991 .

[123]  J. V. Gerpen,et al.  Sulfur Content in Selected Oils and Fats and their Corresponding Methyl Esters , 2009 .

[124]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations , 2009 .

[125]  James J. Corbett,et al.  Marine Transportation and Energy Use , 2004 .

[126]  Kristian Lindgren,et al.  The role of biofuels for transportation in CO2 emission reduction scenarios with global versus regional carbon caps , 2009 .

[127]  Axel Lauer,et al.  Shipping contributes to ocean acidification , 2013 .

[128]  Eric Johnson,et al.  Goodbye to carbon neutral: Getting biomass footprints right , 2009 .

[129]  Magdalena Walczak,et al.  Sustainable energy for the marine sector , 2012 .

[130]  J. Lee Advanced Biofuels and Bioproducts , 2013 .

[131]  Tsan-Huang Huang,et al.  Cost-benefit evaluation of using biodiesel as an alternative fuel for fishing boats in Taiwan , 2012 .

[132]  David Pennington,et al.  Recent developments in Life Cycle Assessment. , 2009, Journal of environmental management.

[133]  T. Koellner,et al.  UNEP-SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[134]  Lars Ingelstam,et al.  System : att tänka över samhälle och teknik , 2002 .

[135]  J. Goldemberg Ethanol for a Sustainable Energy Future , 2007, Science.

[136]  Alice Bows,et al.  Executing a Scharnow turn: reconciling shipping emissions with international commitments on climate change , 2012 .

[137]  Christos A. Frangopoulos,et al.  A Dynamic Model for Liquefied Natural Gas Evaporation During Marine Transportation , 2008 .

[138]  B. Höhlein,et al.  Methanol as an Energy Carrier , 2006 .

[139]  Fredrik Haglind,et al.  A review on the use of gas and steam turbine combined cycles as prime movers for large ships, Part III: Fuels and emissions , 2008 .

[140]  J Dewulf,et al.  Cumulative exergy extraction from the natural environment (CEENE): a comprehensive life cycle impact assessment method for resource accounting. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[141]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[142]  Dennis L. Meadows,et al.  The history and conclusions of The Limits to Growth , 2007 .

[143]  G. Olah Beyond oil and gas: the methanol economy. , 2006, Angewandte Chemie.

[144]  Harilaos N. Psaraftis,et al.  Life-cycle co2 emissions of bulk carriers: A comparative study , 2010 .

[145]  Martha M. Øberg,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Fuel Choices for Marine Vessels , 2013 .

[146]  Axel Lauer,et al.  Emissions from international shipping: 1. The last 50 years , 2005 .

[147]  Global Energy Assessment Writing Team Global Energy Assessment: Toward a Sustainable Future , 2012 .

[148]  Peilin Zhou,et al.  LCA as a tool to aid in the selection of retrofitting alternatives , 2014 .

[149]  M. Huijbregts,et al.  Spatially Explicit Characterization of Acidifying and Eutrophying Air Pollution in Life‐Cycle Assessment , 2000 .

[150]  Roy M. Harrison,et al.  Pollution: Causes, Effects and Control. , 1984 .

[151]  Alice Bows,et al.  Beyond ‘dangerous’ climate change: emission scenarios for a new world , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.