Transforming a phrase like »the future of literary studies« into a question is by no means an unquestionable operation, for it is bound to generate new questions regarding the status of this question. Is it a ›philosophical question‹, a question which, according to a definition by Jean-Francois Lyotard2, has no possible answer and which, therefore, we only ask with the intention of producing a proliferation of further questions? Or is it what one might call a ›real question‹, a question for whose solution there is a concrete (perhaps even an ›existential‹) need? For many decades now, literary critics have been handling questions regarding the future and the social functions of their disciplines as philosophical questions. As such, they have inspired some of the most intense debates in the profession, and have thus greatly contributed to keeping it alive in potentially difficult times.
[1]
Ulrich Weisstein,et al.
Comparative literature and literary theory: survey and introduction
,
1974
.
[2]
H. R. Jauss,et al.
Kleine Apologie der ästhetischen Erfahrung
,
1972
.
[3]
Niklas Luhmann,et al.
Die Beschreibung der Zukunft
,
1992
.
[4]
James Clifford,et al.
The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art.
,
1989
.
[5]
Niklas Luhmann,et al.
Beobachtungen der Moderne
,
1992
.
[6]
Friedrich A. Kittler.
There is No Software
,
1995
.
[7]
Rachel Bowlby,et al.
The Inhuman: Reflections on Time
,
1991
.
[8]
Aristide.
Lire et écrire
,
1960
.
[9]
I. Richards.
Science and poetry
,
1926
.
[10]
H. Gumbrecht,et al.
Materialities of communication
,
1994
.