The Denominator Blindness Effect: Accident Frequencies and the Misjudgment of Recklessness

People seriously misjudge accident risks because they routinely neglect relevant information about exposure. Such risk judgments affect both personal and public policy decisions (e.g., choice of a transport mode) but also play a vital role in legal determinations, such as assessments of recklessness. Experimental evidence for a sample of 422 jury-eligible adults indicates that people incorporate information on the number of accidents, which is the numerator of the risk frequency calculation. However, they appear blind to information on exposure, such as the scale of a firm's operations, which is the risk frequency denominator. Hence, the actual observed accident frequency of accidentssexposure is not influential. Copyright 2004, Oxford University Press.

[1]  Carol A. Heimer.  Review of Baruch Fischhoff, Sarah Lichtenstein, Paul Slovic, Stephen Derby, and Ralph Keeney, Acceptable Risk: American Journal of Sociology , 1982 .

[2]  J. Payne,et al.  Juror Judgments in Civil Cases: Hindsight Effects on Judgments of Liability for Punitive Damages , 1999 .

[3]  H. Kunreuther.  Disaster Insurance Protection: Public Policy Lessons , 1978 .

[4]  Steven Shavell,et al.  Punitive Damages: An Economic Analysis , 1998 .

[5]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Shared Outrage and Erratic Awards: The Psychology of Punitive Damages , 1998 .

[6]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Assessing Punitive Damages (with Notes on Cognition and Valuation in Law) , 1998 .

[7]  R. Posner,et al.  Economic Analysis of Law , 1974 .

[8]  W. Viscusi.  Jurors, Judges, and the Mistreatment of Risk by the Courts , 2000, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[9]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  Assessing Punitive Damages... , 1997 .

[10]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Judged frequency of lethal events , 1978 .

[11]  J. Payne,et al.  Punitive Damages: How Juries Decide , 2002 .

[12]  W. Viscusi,et al.  Rational Risk Policy , 1998 .

[13]  W. Kip Viscusi,et al.  Smoking: Making the Risky Decision , 1992 .

[14]  Corporate Risk Analysis: A Reckless Act? , 2000 .

[15]  J. Rachlinski.  A Positive Psychological Theory of Judging in Hindsight , 1998 .

[16]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Deliberating About Dollars: The Severity Shift , 2000 .

[17]  S. Epstein,et al.  Conflict between intuitive and rational processing: when people behave against their better judgment. , 1994, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  W. Viscusi.  How Do Judges Think about Risk , 1999 .

[19]  W. Kip Viscusi,et al.  What Juries Can't Do Well: The Jury's Performance as a Risk Manager , 1998 .

[20]  J. Payne,et al.  Juror Judgments in Civil Cases: Effects of Plaintiff's Requests and Plaintiff's Identity on Punitive Damage Awards , 1999 .

[21]  Cass R. Sunstein,et al.  DO People Want Optimal Deterrence? , 2000, The Journal of Legal Studies.

[22]  J. Payne,et al.  A Study of Juror and Jury Judgments in Civil Cases: Deciding Liability for Punitive Damages , 1998 .