Intelligibility, listening difficulty and listening efficiency in auralized classrooms.

In order to obtain an effective speech communication in rooms it is advisable, besides reaching the full intelligibility of words, to minimize the effort paid by the listener in the recognition of the speech material. This twofold requirement is not easily described by the current room acoustic indicators, which are mainly concerned either with a subjective rating by means of word recognition scores or with using listeners' impressions of reported listening difficulties. In this work, the problem is tackled by introducing the concept of "listening efficiency," which is defined as a combination of the accuracy of intelligibility and of the effort spent on achieving this goal. This indicator is here developed, and an application of the former and of the "listening efficiency" is presented in the field of classroom acoustics. Listening tests with pupils and adults were performed and the subsequent statistical analyses indicated several interesting findings. In particular, listening efficiency is able to clearly discriminate between equal intelligibility scores obtained under different acoustical conditions, permitting room acoustics to be tailored for specific groups, such as children.

[1]  Murray Hodgson,et al.  Auralization study of optimum reverberation times for speech intelligibility for normal and hearing-impaired listeners in classrooms with diffuse sound fields. , 2006, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  Speech intelligibility studies in classrooms. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  A Boothroyd,et al.  Context effects in phoneme and word recognition by young children and older adults. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[4]  Hiroshi Sato,et al.  Optimum speech level to minimize listening difficulty in public spaces. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Hareo Hamada,et al.  The stereo dipole : A virtual source imaging system using two closely spaced loudspeakers , 1998 .

[6]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  The intelligibility of speech in elementary school classrooms. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Candace Bourland Hick,et al.  Listening effort and fatigue in school-age children with and without hearing loss. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[8]  J. S. Bradley,et al.  Effects of room acoustics on the intelligibility of speech in classrooms for young children. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Nicola Prodi,et al.  The evaluation of binaural playback systems for virtual sound fields , 2003 .

[10]  R. L. Pratt On the use of reaction time as a measure of intelligibility. , 1981, British journal of audiology.

[11]  Bruce A Schneider,et al.  Children's use of semantic cues in degraded listening environments. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Hiroshi Sato,et al.  Listening difficulty as a subjective measure for evaluation of speech transmission performance in public spaces. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  S. Trehub,et al.  Children's perception of speech in multitalker babble. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  D W Downs,et al.  Processing demands during auditory learning under degraded listening conditions. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[15]  B C Moore,et al.  Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[16]  S Gatehouse,et al.  Response times to speech stimuli as measures of benefit from amplification. , 1990, British Journal of Audiology.

[17]  L L Elliott,et al.  Development of a test of speech intelligibility in noise using sentence materials with controlled word predictability. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Hiroshi Sato,et al.  Using listening difficulty ratings of conditions for speech communication in rooms. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  D. Massaro Preperceptual images, processing time, and perceptual units in auditory perception. , 1972, Psychological review.

[20]  Hiroshi Sato,et al.  Relationship between listening difficulty and acoustical objective measures in reverberant sound fields. , 2008, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.