Rabbits were classically conditioned under a single-CS dual-ISI paradigm. Contrary to a previous experiment by Frey (1970), a separate CR was conditioned at each interstimulus interval (ISI), producing a double response (DR) on long-ISI trials. Further experiments indicated that DR development is facilitated by (a) circumorbital US-location and (b) relatively high US-intensity. However, subsequent shifts to nonoptimal conditions did not produce substantial decreases in DR frequency. The presence of DRs appears to be readily amenable to interpretation in terms of a Pavlovian stimulus-trace mechanism in which the US becomes associated with a particular temporal portion of the CS. An instrumental-response-shaping hypothesis of classical conditioning can explain these data only if the hypothetical reinforcement mechanism is assumed to be considerably more complex than had previously been supposed.
[1]
P. Wall,et al.
Pain mechanisms: a new theory.
,
1965,
Science.
[2]
I. Martin,et al.
The genesis of the classical conditioned response
,
1969
.
[3]
P. Frey.
Within-subject analysis of the CS-US interval in rabbit eyelid conditioning
,
1970
.
[4]
F. Hoehler,et al.
Classical nictitating membrane conditioning in the rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus): single alternation with differential intertrial intervals.
,
1973,
Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.
[5]
J. Theios,et al.
Effect of CS-US interval shift on classical conditioning of the nictitating membrane in the rabbit.
,
1967,
Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.