The Sociotechnical Axis of Cohesion for the IS Discipline: Its Historical Legacy and its Continued Relevance

The sociotechnical perspective is often seen as one of the foundational viewpoints—or an “axis of cohesion”— for the Information Systems (IS) discipline, contributing to both its distinctiveness and its ability to coherently expand its boundaries. However, our review of papers in the two leading IS journals from 2000 to 2016 suggests that IS research has lost sight of the discipline’s sociotechnical character—a character that was widely acknowledged at the discipline’s inception. This is a problem because an axis of cohesion can be fundamental to a discipline’s long-term vitality. In order to address this issue, we offer ways to renew the sociotechnical perspective so that it can continue to serve as a distinctive and coherent foundation for the discipline. Our hope is that the renewed sociotechnical frame for the IS discipline discussed in the paper holds potential to contribute to the enduring strength of our diverse, distinctive, yet unified discipline. It also prompts members of the discipline to think more deeply about what it means to be an IS scholar.

[1]  Anandasivam Gopal,et al.  The Asymmetric Benefits of Relational Flexibility: Evidence from Software Development Outsourcing , 2012, MIS Q..

[2]  Raymond F. Zammuto,et al.  Organization Science, Managers, and Language Games , 1992 .

[3]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Evolving Work Routines: Adaptive Routinization of Information Technology in Healthcare , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Sumit Sarkar,et al.  Protecting Privacy Against Record Linkage Disclosure: A Bounded Swapping Approach for Numeric Data , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Marshall Scott Poole,et al.  Affect in Web Interfaces: A Study of the Impacts of Web Page Visual Complexity and Order , 2010, MIS Q..

[6]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success , 2001, MIS Q..

[7]  Ofer Arazy,et al.  Enhancing Information Retrieval Through Statistical Natural Language Processing: A Study of Collocation Indexing , 2007, MIS Q..

[8]  Xiaojun Zhang,et al.  "Doctors Do Too Little Technology": A Longitudinal Field Study of an Electronic Healthcare System Implementation , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Dennis F. Galletta,et al.  Evaluating Journal Quality and the Association for Information Systems Senior Scholars' Journal Basket Via Bibliometric Measures: Do Expert Journal Assessments Add Value? , 2013, MIS Q..

[10]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Understanding Organization-Enterprise System Fit: A Path to Theorizing the Information Technology Artifact , 2010, MIS Q..

[11]  Anne Beaudry,et al.  The Other Side of Acceptance: Studying the Direct and Indirect Effects of Emotions on Information Technology Use , 2010, MIS Q..

[12]  Paul A. Pavlou,et al.  CIO Reporting Structure, Strategic Positioning, and Firm Performance , 2011, MIS Q..

[13]  Varun Grover,et al.  NEW STATE OF PLAY IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH : THE PUSH TO THE EDGES 1 , 2015 .

[14]  Prabhudev Konana,et al.  The Choice of Sourcing Mechanisms for Business Processes , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[15]  Elena Gorbacheva,et al.  Achieving Rigor in Literature Reviews: Insights from Qualitative Data Analysis and Tool-Support , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Praveen Pathak,et al.  The Impact of Automation of Systems on Medical Errors: Evidence from Field Research , 2011, Inf. Syst. Res..