Who cares and who is careless? Insufficient effort responding as a reflection of respondent personality.

Insufficient effort responding (IER) to surveys, which occurs when respondents fail to carefully read questionnaire instructions or item content, has recently gained attention as a source of inaccuracy in self-report data (Huang, Curran, Keeney, Poposki, & DeShon, 2012; Johnson, 2005; Maniaci & Rogge, 2014; Meade & Craig, 2012). Whereas previous studies have focused on IER as a methodological nuisance, the current studies examined IER as a substantive variable. Specifically, we hypothesized that IER is a reflection of enduring individual differences. In Study 1, we found that IER displayed rank-order consistency over the course of 13 months; in Studies 2 and 3, we found that IER displayed rank-order consistency across multiple research situations; in Study 4, we found that acquaintance-reported conscientiousness, agreeableness, extraversion, and emotional stability were each negatively related to IER; and in Study 5, we found that IER was related to college grade point average and class absences. Together, these 5 studies suggest that IER is in part a manifestation of enduring individual differences. (PsycINFO Database Record

[1]  P. Curran.  Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data , 2016 .

[2]  Benjamin M. Walsh,et al.  Insufficient Effort Survey Responding: An Under‐Appreciated Problem in Work and Organisational Health Psychology Research , 2016 .

[3]  Samuel B. Pond,et al.  Using virtual presence and survey instructions to minimize careless responding on Internet-based surveys , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  Jason L. Huang,et al.  Detecting Insufficient Effort Responding with an Infrequency Scale: Evaluating Validity and Participant Reactions , 2014, Journal of Business and Psychology.

[5]  Jason L. Huang,et al.  Insufficient effort responding: examining an insidious confound in survey data. , 2015, The Journal of applied psychology.

[6]  Justin A. DeSimone,et al.  Best practice recommendations for data screening , 2015 .

[7]  Ronald D. Rogge,et al.  Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research. , 2014 .

[8]  Kevin D. Carlson,et al.  Random and Systematic Error Effects of Insomnia on Survey Behavior , 2013 .

[9]  Frederick L Oswald,et al.  The criterion-related validity of personality measures for predicting GPA: a meta-analytic validity competition. , 2013, Psychological assessment.

[10]  J. Lönnqvist,et al.  Persons, situations, and behaviors: consistency and variability of different behaviors in four interpersonal situations. , 2012, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[11]  C. Abraham,et al.  Psychological correlates of university students' academic performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2012, Psychological bulletin.

[12]  A. Meade,et al.  Identifying careless responses in survey data. , 2012, Psychological methods.

[13]  Elizabeth M. Poposki,et al.  Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys , 2012 .

[14]  Rolf Loeber,et al.  Role of test motivation in intelligence testing , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Deniz S Ones,et al.  An other perspective on personality: meta-analytic integration of observers' accuracy and predictive validity. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[16]  D. Funder,et al.  Situational Similarity and Personality Predict Behavioral Consistency , 2022 .

[17]  M. Credé,et al.  Class Attendance in College , 2010 .

[18]  R. McGrath,et al.  Evidence for response bias as a source of error variance in applied assessment. , 2010, Psychological bulletin.

[19]  Timothy J. Pleskac,et al.  Prediction of 4-year college student performance using cognitive and noncognitive predictors and the impact on demographic status of admitted students. , 2009, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  V. Bacharach,et al.  Psychometrics : An Introduction , 2007 .

[21]  John A. Johnson,et al.  The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures ☆ , 2006 .

[22]  Nathan R. Kuncel,et al.  The Validity of Self-Reported Grade Point Averages, Class Ranks, and Test Scores: A Meta-Analysis and Review of the Literature , 2005 .

[23]  John A. Johnson.  Ascertaining the validity of individual protocols from Web-based personality inventories. , 2005 .

[24]  J. E. Kurtz,et al.  Semantic Response Consistency and Protocol Validity in Structured Personality Assessment: The Case of the NEO-PI-R , 2001, Journal of personality assessment.

[25]  John A. Johnson.  Seven social performance scales for the California psychological inventory. , 1997 .

[26]  R. McCrae,et al.  An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[27]  R. Hogan,et al.  Explorations in behavioral consistency: properties of persons, situations, and behaviors. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  J. Krosnick.  Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys , 1991 .

[29]  John A. Johnson.  The "Self-Disclosure" and "Self-Presentation" Views of Item Response Dynamics and Personality Scale Validity , 1981 .

[30]  A. Meade,et al.  Predicting Careless Responses and Attrition in Survey Data with Personality , 2013 .

[31]  A. Meade,et al.  Psychological Methods Identifying Careless Responses in Survey Data , 2012 .

[32]  M. Leary,et al.  Handbook of individual differences in social behavior , 2009 .

[33]  B. Roberts,et al.  Patterns of continuity: a dynamic model for conceptualizing the stability of individual differences in psychological constructs across the life course. , 2005, Psychological review.

[34]  杨文秀,et al.  此处“personality”译法探析 , 2000 .

[35]  B. Roberts,et al.  The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: a quantitative review of longitudinal studies. , 2000, Psychological bulletin.

[36]  P. Costa,et al.  Conceptions and correlates of openness to experience. , 1997 .

[37]  N. Eisenberg,et al.  Agreeableness: A Dimension of Personality , 1997 .

[38]  J. Hogan,et al.  Conscientiousness and integrity at work , 1997 .

[39]  P. Costa,et al.  Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO-Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) , 1992 .

[40]  A. Tellegen,et al.  PERSONALITY PROCESSES AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES An Alternative "Description of Personality": The Big-Five Factor Structure , 2022 .

[41]  L. R. Goldberg,et al.  The prediction of semantic consistency in self-descriptions: characteristics of persons and of terms that affect the consistency of responses to synonym and antonym pairs. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.