Hits and false positives in face matching: A familiarity-based dissociation

In recognition memory for unfamiliar faces, performance for target-present items (hits) does not correlate with performance for target-absent items (false positives), a result which runs counter to the more usual mirror effect. In this paper we examine subjects’ performance on face matching, and demonstrate no relationship between performance on matching items and performance on nonmatching items. This absence of a mirror effect occurs for multidistractor, 1-in-10 matching tasks (Experiment 1) and for simple paired-item tasks (Experiment 2). In Experiment 3 we demonstrate that matching familiar faces produces a strong mirror effect. However, inverting the familiar faces causes the association to disappear once more (Experiment 4). We argue that familiar and unfamiliar faces are represented in qualitatively different ways.

[1]  M. Farah,et al.  The inverted face inversion effect in prosopagnosia: Evidence for mandatory, face-specific perceptual mechanisms , 1995, Vision Research.

[2]  V. Bruce,et al.  Face Recognition in Poor-Quality Video: Evidence From Security Surveillance , 1999 .

[3]  L. Reder,et al.  A mechanistic account of the mirror effect for word frequency: a computational model of remember-know judgments in a continuous recognition paradigm. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  H S Levin,et al.  Prosopagnosia: adouble dissociation between the recognition offamiliar andunfamiliar faces , 1982 .

[5]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Effect of Face Inversion on Activity in Human Neural Systems for Face and Object Perception , 1999, Neuron.

[6]  S. Sikström.  The variance reaction time model , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  G. Wells,et al.  What do we know about eyewitness identification? , 1993, The American psychologist.

[8]  A. Young,et al.  Matching Familiar and Unfamiliar Faces on Internal and External Features , 1985, Perception.

[9]  W. Hockley,et al.  Recollection and familiarity through the looking glass: when old does not mirror new. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  M Glanzer,et al.  The mirror effect in recognition memory: data and theory. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  V. Bruce,et al.  What's Distinctive about a Distinctive Face? , 1994, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[12]  M Glanzer,et al.  The mirror effect in recognition memory , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[13]  Ahmed M. Megreya,et al.  Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[14]  V. Bruce,et al.  Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[15]  V. Bruce,et al.  Recognition of unfamiliar faces , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  Thomas Vetter,et al.  The face typicality-recognizability relationship: Encoding or retrieval locus? , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[17]  V. Bruce,et al.  Face processing: Human perception and principal components analysis , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[19]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  P. Hancock,et al.  Robust representations for face recognition: The power of averages , 2005, Cognitive Psychology.

[21]  C. Liu,et al.  Face recognition is robust with incongruent image resolution: relationship to security video images. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[22]  Paul Miller,et al.  Verification of face identities from images captured on video. , 1999 .

[23]  R. Shiffrin,et al.  A model for recognition memory: REM—retrieving effectively from memory , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  J. R. Vokey,et al.  Familiarity, memorability, and the effect of typicality on the recognition of faces , 1992, Memory & cognition.

[25]  Peter J. B. Hancock,et al.  From Pixels to People: A Model of Familiar Face Recognition , 1999, Cogn. Sci..

[26]  W T Maddox,et al.  Direct and indirect stimulus-frequency effects in recognition. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[27]  S. Clark,et al.  The Target-to-Foils Shift in Simultaneous and Sequential Lineups , 2005, Law and human behavior.

[28]  M. Glanzer,et al.  The regularities of recognition memory. , 1993, Psychological review.

[29]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Familiarity breeds differentiation: a subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. , 1998, Psychological review.

[30]  W. Hockley,et al.  Shades of the mirror effect: Recognition of faces with and without sunglasses , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[31]  G. Pike,et al.  When Seeing should not be Believing: Photographs, Credit Cards and Fraud , 1997 .

[32]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  Familiarity, Target Set and False Positives in Face Recognition , 1997 .

[33]  A. Young,et al.  Face perception after brain injury. Selective impairments affecting identity and expression. , 1993, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[34]  R. Yin.  Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[35]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Recognizing familiar and unfamiliar faces , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[36]  Richard M Shiffrin,et al.  Interactions between study task, study time, and the low-frequency hit rate advantage in recognition memory. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  T. O. Nelson,et al.  The word frequency effect for recognition memory and the elevated-attention hypothesis , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[38]  V. Bruce.  Influences of Familiarity on the Processing of Faces , 1986, Perception.

[39]  B. Gelder,et al.  Paradoxical configuration effects for faces and objects in prosopagnosia , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[40]  L. Reder,et al.  A reexamination of stimulus-frequency effects in recognition: two mirrors for low- and high-frequency pseudowords. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[41]  Vicki Bruce,et al.  Matching the faces of robbers captured on video , 2001 .

[42]  Recognising faces seen alone or with others: when two heads are worse than one , 2006 .

[43]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[44]  A. O'Toole,et al.  Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect , 1994, Memory & cognition.