Comparing the effects of mobile computers and traditional approaches in environmental education

Environmental education and computers? That was traditionally seen as an antagonism. But environmental educators who compete for attention and face new challenges in an age of mobile devices, have begun to explore the opportunities that mobile computers may offer in supporting environmental learning experiences. This study investigates the impact of a mobile guide system on different parameters of environmental literacy in comparison to traditional instruments of environmental education (i.e. brochure, human guide). In a field experiment at a floodplain conservation site, 185 school children and 76 adults participated in a guided tour using different media. Despite the novelty of mobile devices and usability issues associated with the prototype mobile nature guide, participants using the computer-assisted medium achieved similar results concerning environmental literacy components. The computer as mobile guide can lead to an increase in environmental knowledge and in case of the children it can increase their motivation to engage in environmental education activities.

[1]  Sam H. Ham,et al.  Environmental Interpretation: A Practical Guide for People with Big Ideas and Small Budgets , 1993 .

[2]  Doug Knapp,et al.  Content Evaluation of an Environmental Science Field Trip , 2001 .

[3]  Keith Cheverst,et al.  A Survey of Map-based Mobile Guides , 2005 .

[4]  F. Tilden,et al.  Interpreting Our Heritage , 1957 .

[5]  Bryan E. Porter,et al.  Effects of Participation in Class Activities on Children's Environmental Attitudes and Knowledge , 1997 .

[6]  Franz X. Bogner,et al.  Environmental perspectives of pupils: the development of an attitude and behaviour scale , 1996 .

[7]  Roger Holdsworth,et al.  The Impact of Parental Work Experience and Education on Environmental Knowledge, Concern and Behaviour among Adolescents , 1996 .

[8]  P. Schultz.  New Environmental Theories: Empathizing With Nature: The Effects ofPerspective Taking on Concern for Environmental Issues , 2000 .

[9]  L. Chawla.  Significant Life Experiences Revisited: A Review of Research on Sources of Environmental Sensitivity. , 1998 .

[10]  Tetsuro Sakai,et al.  Development and evaluation of a support system for forest education , 2004, Journal of Forest Research.

[11]  Clemens Düpmeier,et al.  Comparing a Mobile Nature Guide and a Paper Guidebook in the Field , 2005 .

[12]  E. Kals,et al.  Emotional Affinity toward Nature as a Motivational Basis to Protect Nature , 1999 .

[13]  Mark H. Davis,et al.  A Multidimensional Approach to Individual Differences in Empathy , 1980 .

[14]  L. Cameron,et al.  A Cross-Cultural Study of Environmental Motive Concerns and Their Implications for Proenvironmental Behavior , 2006 .

[15]  Moira O'Connor,et al.  Environmental Education and Attitudes , 2000 .

[16]  Christian Dustmann,et al.  Parental background, secondary school track choice, and wages , 2004 .

[17]  Franz X. Bogner,et al.  Risk-taking and environmental perception , 2000 .

[18]  Jeffrey L. Marion,et al.  Minimising Visitor Impacts to Protected Areas: The Efficacy of Low Impact Education Programmes , 2007 .

[19]  Sabine Grunwald,et al.  Development of an environmental virtual field laboratory , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[20]  Jeffrey L. Marion,et al.  Communicating Leave No Trace Ethics and Practices: Efficacy of Two-Day Trainer Courses , 2005 .

[21]  M. J. Rosenberg.  Cognitive, Affective and Behavioral Components of Attitudes , 1960 .

[22]  J. Dillon,et al.  The value of outdoor learning: evidence from research in the UK and elsewhere , 2006 .

[23]  Wesley P. Schultz,et al.  Empathizing With Nature: The Effects of Perspective Taking on Concern for Environmental Issues , 2000 .

[24]  F. Bogner.  The Influence of Short-Term Outdoor Ecology Education on Long-Term Variables of Environmental Perspective , 1998 .

[25]  Franz X. Bogner,et al.  Environmental perceptions of Irish and Bavarian pupils: an empirical study , 1998 .

[26]  Jie-Chi Yang,et al.  Affordances of mobile technologies for experiential learning: the interplay of technology and pedagogical practices , 2007, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[27]  D. Light,et al.  Visitors' use of interpretive media at heritage sites. , 1995 .

[28]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Ambient wood: designing new forms of digital augmentation for learning outdoors , 2004, IDC '04.

[29]  Van Velsor,et al.  A qualitative investigation of the urban minority adolescent experience with wildlife , 2004 .

[30]  Norman Reid,et al.  Thoughts on attitude measurement , 2006 .

[31]  Kristi S. Lekies,et al.  Nature and the Life Course: Pathways from Childhood Nature Experiences to Adult Environmentalism , 2006, Children, Youth and Environments.

[32]  Léonie J. Rennie,et al.  Measuring affective outcomes from a visit to a Science Education Centre , 1994 .

[33]  Jacqueline Frick.  Umweltbezogenes Wissen : Struktur, Einstellungsrelevanz und Verhaltenswirksamkeit , 2003 .

[34]  Gerhard Schwabe,et al.  Mobile learning with a mobile game: design and motivational effects , 2005, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[35]  Maria Lazaridou,et al.  A Comparison Between a Traditional and an Online Environmental Educational Program , 2006 .

[36]  Chad M. Gotch,et al.  Understanding nature‐related behaviors among children through a theory of reasoned action approach , 2004 .

[37]  Ulrike Unterbruner,et al.  Wirkung verarbeitungsfördernder multimedialer Programmgestaltung auf den Lernprozess von 10- bis 12-Jährigen , 2005 .

[38]  F. Kaiser,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL ATTITUDE AND ECOLOGICAL BEHAVIOUR , 1999 .

[39]  P. Wesley Schultz,et al.  Values and their Relationship to Environmental Concern and Conservation Behavior , 2005 .

[40]  J. Stratford,et al.  Student perceptions of a virtual field trip to replace a real field trip , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[41]  S. Hennessy,et al.  Graphing investigations using portable (palmtop) technology , 2001, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[42]  Antonella De Angeli,et al.  Explore! possibilities and challenges of mobile learning , 2008, CHI.

[43]  John Shultis,et al.  Consuming Nature: The Uneasy Relationship Between Technology, Outdoor Recreation and Protected Areas , 2002 .

[44]  Inci Morgil,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF COMPUTER-ASSISTED EDUCATION ON ENVIRONMENTAL KNOWLEDGE AND ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS , 2004 .

[45]  Bryan E. Porter,et al.  Outcome Research in Environmental Education: A Critical Review , 1993 .

[46]  Gianna Moscardo,et al.  Mindful visitors: Heritage and tourism , 1996 .

[47]  T. Gärling,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL CONCERN: CONCEPTUAL DEFINITIONS, MEASUREMENT METHODS, AND RESEARCH FINDINGS , 1999 .

[48]  Susan K. Jacobson,et al.  ECOSYSTEM MANAGEMENT EDUCATION FOR PUBLIC LANDS , 1999 .

[49]  Yuh-Shyan Chen,et al.  A mobile learning system for scaffolding bird watching learning , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[50]  Gerd Bohner,et al.  Evaluation research in environmental sociology and in environmental psychology , 2004 .

[51]  P. Eagles,et al.  Factors Influencing Children's Environmental Attitudes , 1999 .

[52]  Gunnar Grendstad,et al.  Correlates of Environmental Behaviors , 2001 .

[53]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Enhancing learning: a study of how mobile devices can facilitate sensemaking , 2010, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[54]  S. Hsi,et al.  A study of user experiences mediated by nomadic web content in a museum , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[55]  A. Kollmuss,et al.  Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? , 2002 .

[56]  Gerhard Schwabe,et al.  Does team size matter in mobile learning? , 2005, International Conference on Mobile Business (ICMB'05).

[57]  Nadire Cavus,et al.  Using mobile learning to increase environmental awareness , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[58]  Henk J. Scholten,et al.  Adding value and improving processes using location-based services in protected areas , 2005 .

[59]  A. Greenwald.  Within-subjects designs: To use or not to use? , 1976 .