This article asks whether the increasing recourse of European public broadcasters to commercial income sources endangers their public service commitments. As a benchmark, a distinctive mission for public television is outlined, concentrating on four communication tasks and four value commitments that private television tends to neglect. The implications for such a mission of three commercial revenue sources — advertising, sponsorship and foreign programme earnings — are examined. Other assimilating pressures, operative in a mixed system, which encourage public broadcasters to tailor their programming to private television are also identified. The various problems raised are explored in detail through a case study of the likely future of children's television in Britain. The author concludes that the claims of `purity' and `pragmatism' can be reconciled only through the adoption by public broadcasters of an integrity-safeguarding policy, the main elements of which are outlined.
[1]
Tim Congdon,et al.
Paying for Broadcasting: The Handbook
,
1992
.
[2]
J. Blumler,et al.
Broadcasting Finance and Programme Quality: An International Review
,
1986
.
[3]
Alan T. Peacock,et al.
Report of the Committee on Financing the BBC
,
1986
.
[4]
Paul Slaa,et al.
From Media Policy Towards a National Communications Policy: Broadening the Scope
,
1993
.
[5]
P. Sepstrup.
Transnationalization of television in Western Europe
,
1990
.
[6]
E. D. Bens.
Flanders in the Spell of Commercial Television
,
1991
.
[7]
Jan Servaes.
‘Europe 1992’: The audiovisual challenge
,
1992
.
[8]
Jay G. Blumler,et al.
Television and the public interest : vulnerable values in West European broadcasting
,
1991
.