Digital Paywall Design: Implications for Content Demand & Subscriptions

Most online content publishers have moved to subscription-based business models regulated by digital paywalls. But the managerial implications of such freemium content offerings are not well understood. We, therefore, utilized microlevel user activity data from the New York Times to conduct a large-scale study of the implications of digital paywall design for publishers. Specifically, we use a quasi-experiment that varied the (1) quantity (the number of free articles) and (2) exclusivity (the number of available sections) of free content available through the paywall to investigate the effects of paywall design on content demand, subscriptions, and total revenue. The paywall policy changes we studied suppressed total content demand by about 9.9%, reducing total advertising revenue. However, this decrease was more than offset by increased subscription revenue as the policy change led to a 31% increase in total subscriptions during our seven-month study, yielding net positive revenues of over $230,000. The results confirm an economically significant impact of the newspaper’s paywall design on content demand, subscriptions, and net revenue. Our findings can help structure the scientific discussion about digital paywall design and help managers optimize digital paywalls to maximize readership, revenue, and profit. This paper was accepted by Chris Forman, information systems.

[1]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  Information rules - a strategic guide to the network economy , 1999 .

[2]  Ravi Bapna,et al.  Monetizing Freemium Communities: Does Paying for Premium Increase Social Engagement? , 2016, MIS Q..

[3]  Joshua D. Angrist,et al.  Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion , 2008 .

[4]  Shivendu Shivendu,et al.  Managing Piracy: Pricing and Sampling Strategies for Digital Experience Goods in Vertically Segmented Markets , 2003, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  Lesley Chiou,et al.  Paywalls and the demand for news , 2013, Inf. Econ. Policy.

[6]  Joshua S. Gans,et al.  The Impact of the Internet on Advertising Markets for News Media , 2013 .

[7]  Patrick A. Puhani,et al.  The Treatment Effect, the Cross Difference, and the Interaction Term in Nonlinear 'Difference-in-Differences' Models , 2008 .

[8]  Jesse M. Shapiro,et al.  Ideological Segregation Online and Offline , 2010 .

[9]  C. Ai,et al.  Interaction terms in logit and probit models , 2003 .

[10]  Carl F. Mela,et al.  Customer Channel Migration , 2008 .

[11]  Puneet Manchanda,et al.  Paywalls: Monetizing Online Content , 2018, Journal of Marketing.

[12]  Amir Heiman,et al.  Using Demonstration to Increase New Product Acceptance: Controlling Demonstration Time , 1996 .

[13]  Ramon Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Strategies to Fight Ad-Sponsored Rivals , 2010 .

[14]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[15]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Competition between Local and Electronic Markets: How the Benefit of Buying Online Depends on Where You Live , 2007, Manag. Sci..

[16]  Hemant K. Bhargava,et al.  Information Goods and Vertical Differentiation , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[17]  Robert W. Shoemaker,et al.  The Effects of Free Sample Promotions on Incremental Brand Sales , 2004 .

[18]  J. Angrist Mostly Harmless Econometrics , 2008 .

[19]  Sean J. Taylor,et al.  What’s in a Username? Identity Cue Effects in Social Media , 2019 .

[20]  Vineet Kumar,et al.  The New York Times Paywall , 2012 .

[21]  Joseph T. Mahoney,et al.  Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy , 2000 .

[22]  M. Dekimpe,et al.  The Market Valuation of Internet Channel Additions , 2002 .

[23]  Inge Geyskens,et al.  How cannibalistic is the internet channel? A study of the newspaper industry in the United Kingdom and the Netherlands , 2002 .

[24]  Hsiang Iris Chyi,et al.  Willingness to Pay for Online News: An Empirical Study on the Viability of the Subscription Model , 2005 .

[25]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Crowdfunding: Geography, Social Networks, and the Timing of Investment Decisions , 2015, Journal of Economics & Management Strategy.

[26]  Donald R. Lehmann,et al.  When giving some away makes sense to jump-start the diffusion process , 2006 .

[27]  J. Kmenta Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist's Companion , 2010 .

[28]  Silvana Tenreyro,et al.  The Log of Gravity , 2004, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[29]  Avi Goldfarb,et al.  Privacy Regulation and Online Advertising , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[30]  Mary Caravella,et al.  Adding Bricks to Clicks: Predicting the Patterns of Cross-Channel Elasticities over Time , 2011 .

[31]  Erik T. Nesson,et al.  Interaction Terms in Poisson and Log Linear Regression Models , 2016 .

[32]  David Zilberman,et al.  Learning and Forgetting: Modeling Optimal Product Sampling Over Time , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[33]  Kanishka Misra,et al.  Fee or Free: When Should Firms Charge for Online Content? , 2015, Manag. Sci..

[34]  D. J. Wu,et al.  Economics of Free Under Perpetual Licensing: Implications for the Software Industry , 2014, Inf. Syst. Res..

[35]  Identification and Inference in Nonlinear Difference-in-Differences Models , 2006 .

[36]  R. Oaxaca,et al.  Results on the bias and inconsistency of ordinary least squares for the linear probability model , 2006 .

[37]  Gal Oestreicher-Singer,et al.  Content or Community? A Digital Business Strategy for Content Providers in the Social Age , 2013, MIS Q..

[38]  Galit Shmueli,et al.  An Extensive Examination of Regression Models with a Binary Outcome Variable , 2017, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..