Differential demographic responses of sympatric Parids to vegetation management in boreal forest

Abstract Large-scale removal of small-diameter trees (i.e. thinning from below) in boreal forest can diminish niche diversity for birds that rely on a well-developed understory for nesting and foraging. Yet, few studies have examined how reduced niche diversity in managed forests affects fitness measures in closely-related species and the ability of competing species to co-exist. We related forest thinning to population trends of the willow tit Poecile montana (declining) and its dominant competitor the crested tit Lophophanes cristatus (stable), and conducted a 3-year comparative study to determine how variation in understory spruce density differentially influences survival and reproduction in these species. In line with our prediction that crested tits would gain resource priority under conditions of reduced forest understory complexity, willow tits and their nestlings suffered a disproportionate decline in both nest and adult survival prospects relative to crested tits as understory spruce density declined. Willow tits also had increased numbers of tail feather fault bars with decreasing understory complexity, further supporting the idea that willow tits suffer from food shortage and increased predation risk in areas of reduced understory. The long-term population declines of willow tits in boreal forest appears linked to large scale harvest of small-diameter spruce trees that provide important understory vegetation. A patchy arrangement of different thinning treatments through ‘Understory Retention Thinning’ (URT) may provide a cost-effective way to restore long-term structural complexity and biodiversity in densely stocked conifer stands.

[1]  M. Conroy,et al.  Effects of forest management on density, survival, and population growth of wood thrushes. , 2000 .

[2]  M. Mönkkönen,et al.  HABITAT LOSS AND FRAGMENTATION IN DYNAMIC LANDSCAPES: AVIAN PERSPECTIVES FROM THE BOREAL FOREST* , 2002 .

[3]  J. Moreno,et al.  Body Size, Interspecific Interactions, and Use of Foraging Sites in Tits (Paridae). , 1987, Ecology.

[4]  P. Helle,et al.  Population trends of North Finnish land birds in relation to their habitat selection and changes in forest structure , 1986 .

[5]  E. Belda,et al.  Importance of adult survival, local recruitment and immigration in a declining boreal forest passerine, the willow tit Parus montanus , 2006, Oecologia.

[6]  J. Ekman Coherence, Composition and Territories of Winter Social Groups of the Willow Tit Parus montanus and the Crested Tit P. cristatus , 1979 .

[7]  Harold F. Mayfield,et al.  SUGGESTIONS FOR CALCULATING NEST SUCCESS , 2016 .

[8]  T. Mappes,et al.  Predation risk and the organization of the Parus guild , 1993 .

[9]  J. Ekman,et al.  A Removal Experiment on Crested Tit Parus cristatus and Willow Tip P. montanus in the Breeding Season , 1976 .

[10]  Lars Gustafsson,et al.  Exploitation competition influences the use of foraging sites by tits : Experimental evidence , 1987 .

[11]  Jan Ekman,et al.  Exposure and time use in willow tit flocks: the cost of subordination , 1987, Animal Behaviour.

[12]  H. Andrén,et al.  Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: a review , 1994 .

[13]  D. Lack The natural regulation of animal numbers , 1954 .

[14]  David R. Anderson,et al.  Model selection and multimodel inference : a practical information-theoretic approach , 2003 .

[15]  K. Koivula,et al.  Dominance, Daily Activity and Winter Survival in Willow Tits: Detrimental Cost of Long Working Hours? , 1997 .

[16]  J. A. Baker,et al.  A review of the long-term effects of post-harvest silviculture on vertebrate wildlife, and predictive models, with an emphasis on boreal forests in Ontario, Canada , 2003 .

[17]  J. Niemelä,et al.  The effects of forestry on carabid beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in boreal forests , 2007, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[18]  I. Krams Predation Risk and Shifts of Foraging Sites in Mixed Willow and Crested Tit Flocks , 1996 .

[19]  John A. Wiens,et al.  The Ecology Of Bird Communities , 1989 .

[20]  K. Burnham,et al.  Program MARK: survival estimation from populations of marked animals , 1999 .

[21]  J. Ekman,et al.  Predation risk induces changes in nest-site selection and clutch size in the Siberian jay , 2006, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[22]  J. Ekman,et al.  Winter mortality and food supply in tits Parus spp. , 1981 .

[23]  Kai Curry-Lindahi,et al.  Handbuch der Vogel Mitteleuropas , 1970 .

[24]  J. Ekman,et al.  Nest predation and habitat change interact to influence Siberian jay numbers , 2005 .

[25]  Von Fritz-Bernd Ludescher Sumpfmeise(Parus p. palustris L.) und Weidenmeise(P. montanus salicarius Br.) als sympatrische Zwillingsarten , 2005, Journal für Ornithologie.

[26]  G. Bortolotti,et al.  Stress during feather development predicts fitness potential , 2002 .

[27]  Matthew D. Johnson,et al.  MEASURING HABITAT QUALITY: A REVIEW , 2007 .

[29]  T. Pärt,et al.  Habitat-specific differences in adult survival rates and its links to parental workload and on-nest predation. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.

[30]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Retention Forestry to Maintain Multifunctional Forests: A World Perspective , 2012 .

[31]  L. Gustafsson,et al.  Interspecific Competition and Niche Changes in Tits (Parus spp.): Evaluation of Nonexperimental Data , 1986, The American Naturalist.

[32]  K. Norris,et al.  Extinction processes in hot spots of avian biodiversity and the targeting of pre–emptive conservation action , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[33]  A. Chalfoun,et al.  Habitat structure mediates predation risk for sedentary prey: experimental tests of alternative hypotheses. , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.

[34]  Tzung‐Su Ding,et al.  Short-term Responses of Animal Communities to Thinning in a Cryptomeria japonica (Taxodiaceae) Plantation in Taiwan , 2005 .

[35]  Carol L. Chambers,et al.  Wildlife responses to thinning and burning treatments in southwestern conifer forests: A meta-analysis , 2010 .

[36]  B. Sæther,et al.  AVIAN LIFE HISTORY VARIATION AND CONTRIBUTION OF DEMOGRAPHIC TRAITS TO THE POPULATION GROWTH RATE , 2000 .

[37]  A. Møller,et al.  Frequency of fault bars in feathers of birds and susceptibility to predation , 2009 .

[38]  M. Leonard,et al.  Effect of forest management on a rare habitat specialist, the Bicknell's Thrush (Catharus bicknelli) , 2008 .

[39]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[40]  J. Ekman ECOLOGY OF NON-BREEDING SOCIAL SYSTEMS OF PARUS , 1989 .

[41]  L. Sevensson Identification Guide to European Passerines , 1975 .

[42]  R. Zwolak A meta-analysis of the effects of wildfire, clearcutting, and partial harvest on the abundance of North American small mammals , 2009 .

[43]  REPRODUCTIVE COST, AGE‐SPECIFIC SURVIVAL AND A COMPARISON OF THE REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY IN TWO EUROPEAN TITS (GENUS PARUS) , 1986, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[44]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Behavioral decisions made under the risk of predation: a review and prospectus , 1990 .

[45]  B. Söderström Effects of different levels of green- and dead-tree retention on hemi-boreal forest bird communities in Sweden. , 2009 .

[46]  Alain F. Zuur,et al.  A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems , 2010 .

[47]  J. Ekman,et al.  Impact of Forestry Practices on Fitness Correlates and Population Productivity in an Open‐Nesting Bird Species , 2007, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[48]  S. Nilsson The evolution of nest-site selection among hole-nesting birds: the importance of nest predation and competition , 1984 .

[49]  G. Siriwardena Possible roles of habitat, competition and avian nest predation in the decline of the Willow Tit Parus montanus in Britain , 2004 .

[50]  M. Witter,et al.  Habitat structure, stress and plumage development , 1995, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.