Use of a marginal structural model to determine the effect of aspirin on cardiovascular mortality in the Physicians' Health Study.

The 1982-1988 aspirin component of the Physicians' Health Study, a randomized trial of aspirin and beta-carotene in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer among 22,071 US male physicians, was terminated early primarily because of a statistically extreme 44% reduction in first myocardial infarction, with inadequate precision and no apparent effect on the primary endpoint, cardiovascular death. Because of the demonstrated efficacy of aspirin in secondary prevention of cardiovascular death, nonfatal cardiovascular events may simultaneously be time-dependent confounders and intermediate variables. Aspirin use is strongly influenced by these as well as other diseases, side effects, and cardiovascular risk factors. The authors used a marginal structural model with time-dependent inverse probability weights to estimate the underlying causal effect of aspirin on cardiovascular mortality. Although intention-to-treat analyses found no effect (rate ratio = 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.72, 1.38), the estimated causal rate ratio was altered to 0.75 but remained nonsignificant (95% CI: 0.48, 1.16). As-treated analyses suggested a more modest effect of aspirin use (rate ratio = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.65, 1.25). Although the numbers of cardiovascular deaths were insufficient to evaluate this endpoint definitively, use of such methods holds much potential for controlling time-varying confounders affected by previous exposure.

[1]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1994 .

[2]  J. Robins,et al.  Marginal Structural Models to Estimate the Joint Causal Effect of Nonrandomized Treatments , 2001 .

[3]  J. Robins,et al.  Estimation of the Causal Effect of a Time-Varying Exposure on the Marginal Mean of a Repeated Binary Outcome , 1999 .

[4]  D. DeMets,et al.  Issues in the early termination of the aspirin component of the Physicians' Health Study. Data Monitoring Board of the Physicians' Health Study. , 1991, Annals of epidemiology.

[5]  J. Robins,et al.  Marginal Structural Models and Causal Inference in Epidemiology , 2000, Epidemiology.

[6]  J. Robins,et al.  Estimating the effect of zidovudine on Kaposi's sarcoma from observational data using a rank preserving structural failure-time model. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[7]  Aspirin for heart patients. , 1985, FDA drug bulletin.

[8]  G. Shaw,et al.  Maternal pesticide exposure from multiple sources and selected congenital anomalies. , 1999 .

[9]  J. Robins,et al.  A method for the analysis of randomized trials with compliance information: an application to the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. , 1993, Controlled clinical trials.

[10]  R B D'Agostino,et al.  Relation of pooled logistic regression to time dependent Cox regression analysis: the Framingham Heart Study. , 1990, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  J. Manson,et al.  Baseline characteristics of participants in the Physicians' Health Study: a randomized trial of aspirin and beta-carotene in U.S. physicians. , 1991, American journal of preventive medicine.

[12]  M. Joffe Confounding by indication: the case of calcium channel blockers , 2000, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[13]  C. Hennekens,et al.  A randomized trial of aspirin and β-carotene among U.S. physicians , 1985 .

[14]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Logistic Regression Using the SAS® System@@@Logistic Regression Using the SAS registered System , 2000 .

[15]  Donald B. Rubin,et al.  Bayesian Inference for Causal Effects: The Role of Randomization , 1978 .

[16]  J. Robins,et al.  G-estimation of causal effects: isolated systolic hypertension and cardiovascular death in the Framingham Heart Study. , 1998, American journal of epidemiology.

[17]  J. Pearl Causal diagrams for empirical research , 1995 .

[18]  V. Siskind The need for randomization in the study of intended effects. , 1985, Statistics in medicine.

[19]  P. Rosenbaum The Consequences of Adjustment for a Concomitant Variable that Has Been Affected by the Treatment , 1984 .

[20]  J. Pearl Causal diagrams for empirical researchRejoinder to Discussions of ‘Causal diagrams for empirical research’ , 1995 .

[21]  James M. Robins,et al.  Marginal Structural Models versus Structural nested Models as Tools for Causal inference , 2000 .

[22]  Final report on the aspirin component of the ongoing Physicians' Health Study. , 1989, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  J. Robins,et al.  Estimating the causal effect of smoking cessation in the presence of confounding factors using a rank preserving structural failure time model. , 1993, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  J. Robins,et al.  Correcting for Noncompliance and Dependent Censoring in an AIDS Clinical Trial with Inverse Probability of Censoring Weighted (IPCW) Log‐Rank Tests , 2000, Biometrics.

[25]  C. Hennekens,et al.  A randomized trial of aspirin and beta-carotene among U.S. physicians. , 1985, Preventive medicine.

[26]  James M. Robins,et al.  Association, Causation, And Marginal Structural Models , 1999, Synthese.

[27]  D. Berry,et al.  Statistical models in epidemiology, the environment, and clinical trials , 2000 .

[28]  K Y Liang,et al.  Longitudinal data analysis for discrete and continuous outcomes. , 1986, Biometrics.

[29]  J. Robins,et al.  Marginal structural models to estimate the causal effect of zidovudine on the survival of HIV-positive men. , 2000, Epidemiology.

[30]  D. Rubin,et al.  The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects , 1983 .