An Empirical Investigation of the Value of Integrating Enterprise Information Systems: The Case of Medical Imaging Informatics

This paper identifies and measures the various business value benefits that accrue as a result of implementing and integrating large-scale enterprise information systems. Specifically, we look at the integration of electronic medical records for all patients with the radiology information system and a picture archiving and communication system at a regional medical center. Our work is among the first to carefully study and analyze the impact of enterprise information systems at a large-scale service organization that produces intangible outputs—health. It extends the literature on information economics by quantifying the benefits in process dynamics as a source of ongoing firm-level performance improvements. The key dimensions of measurements include financial revenues, operating lead times, and subjective satisfaction levels by the clinical staff and by the referring physicians. Analyses of longitudinal data suggest that performance levels along a key metric—clinical process lead time—showed a significant improvement immediately after the deployment and integration of the systems. The evidence reveals that performance kept improving for the following 12 months at an impressive learning rate of 63 percent. Moreover, the reported satisfaction level after installation was higher among referring physicians who actively used the full spectrum of technological functionalities at their own clinics or at the hospital's site. Finally, we present a general framework for capturing the actual tangible and intangible benefits of enterprise information systems installation and integration in a clinical context.

[1]  M HittLorin,et al.  Investment in Enterprise Resource Planning , 2002 .

[2]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Beyond the Hype of Frictionless Markets: Evidence of Heterogeneity in Price Rigidity on the Internet , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Nicholas G. Carr,et al.  Does IT Matter? Information Technology and the Corrosion of Competitive Advantage , 2004 .

[4]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[5]  J P Crabbe,et al.  Improving report turnaround time: an integrated method using data from a radiology information system. , 1994, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Andrew P. McAfee THE IMPACT OF ENTERPRISE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION ON OPERATIONAL PERFORMANCE: AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION , 2002 .

[7]  Pablo R Ros,et al.  Use of productivity and financial indicators for monitoring performance in academic radiology departments: U.S. nationwide survey. , 2005, Radiology.

[8]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Computing Productivity: Firm-Level Evidence , 2003, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[9]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Business Value of Information Technology: A Study of Electronic Data Interchange , 1995, MIS Q..

[10]  K. Srinivasan,et al.  Impact of Electronic Data Interchange Technology on JIT Shipments , 1994 .

[11]  Christina Beach Thielst,et al.  The future of healthcare technology. , 2007, Journal of healthcare management / American College of Healthcare Executives.

[12]  Angela Lin,et al.  Mission Critical: Realizing the Promise of Enterprise Systems , 2001 .

[13]  D. J. Wu,et al.  Investment in Enterprise Resource Planning: Business Impact and Productivity Measures , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[15]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  The Legacy of the Technology Acceptance Model and a Proposal for a Paradigm Shift , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[16]  Erik Brynjolfsson,et al.  The productivity paradox of information technology , 1993, CACM.

[17]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Electronic data interchange: competitive externalities and strategic implementation policies , 1995 .

[18]  Charles Maynard Use of Productivity and Financial Indicators for Monitoring Performance in Academic Radiology Departments: U.S. Nationwide SurveyOndategui-Parra S, Bhagwat JG, Zou KH, et al (Harvard Med School, Boston) Radiology 236:214–219, 2005§ , 2006 .

[19]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  Order Lead-Time Improvement Following Enterprise Information Technology Implementation: An Empirical Study , 2006, MIS Q..

[20]  Mark Cotteleer,et al.  An Empirical Study of Operational Performance Parity Following Enterprise System Deployment , 2006 .

[21]  Robert J. Kauffman,et al.  Option-Based Risk Management: A Field Study of Sequential Information Technology Investment Decisions , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[22]  E G Grant,et al.  Cost of PACS and computed radiography in the United States. , 1998, Radiology.

[23]  Sunder Kekre,et al.  Strategic and Operational Benefits of Electronic Integration in B2B Procurement Processes , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[24]  J. Davidson Frame Book Review: Reinventing Project Management: The Diamond Approach to Successful Growth and Innovation , 2008 .

[25]  Pablo R Ros,et al.  Practice management performance indicators in academic radiology departments. , 2004, Radiology.

[26]  Eliot L Siegel,et al.  Technologists' productivity when using PACS: comparison of film-based versus filmless radiography. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  S. Roach Services under siege--the restructuring imperative. , 1991, Harvard business review.

[28]  Shoshana Zuboff,et al.  In the Age of the Smart Machine: The Future of Work and Power , 1989 .