Why environmental scientists are becoming Bayesians

Advances in computational statistics provide a general framework for the high-dimensional models typically needed for ecological inference and prediction. Hierarchical Bayes (HB) represents a modelling structure with capacity to exploit diverse sources of information, to accommodate influences that are unknown (or unknowable), and to draw inference on large numbers of latent variables and parameters that describe complex relationships. Here I summarize the structure of HB and provide examples for common spatiotemporal problems. The flexible framework means that parameters, variables and latent variables can represent broader classes of model elements than are treated in traditional models. Inference and prediction depend on two types of stochasticity, including (1) uncertainty, which describes our knowledge of fixed quantities, it applies to all ‘unobservables’ (latent variables and parameters), and it declines asymptotically with sample size, and (2) variability, which applies to fluctuations that are not explained by deterministic processes and does not decline asymptotically with sample size. Examples demonstrate how different sources of stochasticity impact inference and prediction and how allowance for stochastic influences can guide research.

[1]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  UNCERTAINTY AND THE MANAGEMENT OF MULTISTATE ECOSYSTEMS: AN APPARENTLY RATIONAL ROUTE TO COLLAPSE , 2003 .

[2]  Peter Müller,et al.  INCORPORATING MULTIPLE SOURCES OF STOCHASTICITY INTO DYNAMIC POPULATION MODELS , 2003 .

[3]  S Pacala,et al.  Long-Term Studies of Vegetation Dynamics , 2001, Science.

[4]  S. R. Carpenter,et al.  Microcosm experiments have limited relevance for community and ecosystem ecology : Microcosms , 1996 .

[5]  Aaron M. Ellison,et al.  Bayesian inference in ecology , 2004 .

[6]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Ecological forecasts: an emerging imperative. , 2001, Science.

[7]  Janneke HilleRisLambers,et al.  Seed Dispersal Near and Far: Patterns Across Temperate and Tropical Forests , 1999 .

[8]  C. Wikle.  Hierarchical Models in Environmental Science , 2003 .

[9]  James S. Clark,et al.  FECUNDITY OF TREES AND THE COLONIZATION–COMPETITION HYPOTHESIS , 2004 .

[10]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[11]  James S. Clark,et al.  POPULATION TIME SERIES: PROCESS VARIABILITY, OBSERVATION ERRORS, MISSING VALUES, LAGS, AND HIDDEN STATES , 2004 .

[12]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems , 2001, Nature.

[13]  J. Berger,et al.  Objective Bayesian Analysis of Spatially Correlated Data , 2001 .

[14]  S. Pacala,et al.  SEEDLING RECRUITMENT IN FORESTS: CALIBRATING MODELS TO PREDICT PATTERNS OF TREE SEEDLING DISPERSION' , 1994 .

[15]  David K. Skelly,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL VENUE AND ESTIMATION OF INTERACTION STRENGTH , 2002 .

[16]  S. Levin.  The problem of pattern and scale in ecology , 1992 .

[17]  Christopher K. Wikle,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian Models for Predicting The Spread of Ecological Processes , 2003 .

[18]  Jay M. Ver Hoef,et al.  Parametric Empirical Bayes Methods for Ecological Applications , 1996 .

[19]  H. Caswell.  THEORY AND MODELS IN ECOLOGY: A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE , 1988 .

[20]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation: Spiegelhalter/Clinical Trials and Health-Care Evaluation , 2004 .

[21]  A. Raftery,et al.  Model Validation and Spatial Interpolation by Combining Observations with Outputs from Numerical Models via Bayesian Melding , 2001 .

[22]  James S. Clark,et al.  UNCERTAINTY AND VARIABILITY IN DEMOGRAPHY AND POPULATION GROWTH: A HIERARCHICAL APPROACH , 2003 .

[23]  Stephen R. Carpenter,et al.  ECOLOGICAL FUTURES: BUILDING AN ECOLOGY OF THE LONG NOW1 , 2002 .

[24]  Peter E. Rossi,et al.  Bayesian Analysis of Stochastic Volatility Models , 1994 .

[25]  L. Mark Berliner,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian Time Series Models , 1996 .

[26]  Richard T. Conant,et al.  BEST PRACTICES IN PREDICTION FOR DECISION‐MAKING: LESSONS FROM THE ATMOSPHERIC AND EARTH SCIENCES , 2003 .

[27]  Adrian F. M. Smith,et al.  Sampling-Based Approaches to Calculating Marginal Densities , 1990 .

[28]  A. Gelfand,et al.  Modelling species diversity through species level hierarchical modelling , 2005 .

[29]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[30]  L. Mark Berliner,et al.  Spatiotemporal Hierarchical Bayesian Modeling Tropical Ocean Surface Winds , 2001 .

[31]  D. Schluter,et al.  MICROCOSM EXPERIMENTS HAVE LIMITED RELEVANCE FOR COMMUNITY AND ECOSYSTEM ECOLOGY , 1996 .

[32]  Philip M. Dixon,et al.  Introduction: Ecological Applications of Bayesian Inference , 1996 .

[33]  Russell B. Millar,et al.  BUGS in Bayesian stock assessments , 1999 .

[34]  Bradley P. Carlin,et al.  Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit , 2002 .

[35]  A. P. Dawid,et al.  Probability, Causality and the Empirical World: A Bayes-de Finetti-Popper-Borel Synthesis , 2004 .

[36]  S. Ellner,et al.  USING PVA FOR MANAGEMENT DESPITE UNCERTAINTY: EFFECTS OF HABITAT, HATCHERIES, AND HARVEST ON SALMON , 2003 .

[37]  Michael C. Dietze,et al.  COEXISTENCE: HOW TO IDENTIFY TROPHIC TRADE-OFFS , 2003 .

[38]  Tommi S. Jaakkola,et al.  Bayesian Methods for Elucidating Genetic Regulatory Networks , 2002, IEEE Intell. Syst..