National systems of innovation under strain: the internationalisation of corporate R&D.

The central components of national systems of innovation in the advanced OECD countries are the innovative activities performed by practitioners (mainly businesses), and the basic research and related training performed by universities. The close linkages observed between the national science base and innovative activities in nationally owned firms reflect the advantages of physical agglomeration in innovative activities, and allow companies and countries to extract major economic benefits from their investments. However, national systems of innovation are under increasing strain, because of emerging imbalances between what the science base has to offer, and the demands of the technology system. These imbalances reflect the combined effects of (1) the liberalisation of international exchanges, (2) uneven rates of national technological development, (3) increasing pressures of competition, (4) the increasing range of fields of potentially useful technology. These imbalances have long been felt by large firms in smaller countries. They have recently been experienced in different forms in Germany, Japan and the UK, in the last of which the dominant links between the science base and national firms has virtually disappeared in the electronics industry, and been replaced by more complicated links with foreign firms. These are likely to grow in all countries in future.

[1]  A. Jaffe.  Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[2]  J. Cantwell.  The Globalisation of Technology: What Remains of the Product Cycle Model? , 1995 .

[3]  P. Patel,et al.  Are large firms internationalizing the generation of technology? Some new evidence , 1996 .

[4]  M. Hobday.  Innovation in East Asia , 1995 .

[5]  Roy Rothwell,et al.  The characteristics of successful innovators and technically progressive firms (with some comments on innovation research) , 1977 .

[6]  R. Nelson.  The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research , 1959, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  M. Bell,et al.  Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts Between Developed and Developing Countries , 1993 .

[8]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Large Firms in the Production of the World's Technology: An Important Case of “Non-Globalisation” , 1991 .

[9]  P. Patel,et al.  Patterns of internationalisation of corporate technology: location vs. home country advantages. , 1999 .

[10]  R. Vernon.  International investment and international trade in the product cycle , 1966 .

[11]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[12]  Patel Parimal,et al.  National Innovation Systems: Why They Are Important, And How They Might Be Measured And Compared , 1994 .

[13]  K. Arrow.  Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[14]  Kimberly S. Hamilton,et al.  The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science , 1997 .

[15]  Jan Fagerberg,et al.  Technology and International Differences in Growth Rates , 1994 .

[16]  M. Porter.  The Competitive Advantage Of Nations , 1990 .

[17]  C. Freeman.  The ‘National System of Innovation’ in historical perspective , 1995 .

[18]  J. Cantwell.  Innovation Policy in a Global Economy: Innovation as the principal source of growth in the global economy , 1999 .

[19]  H. Etemad,et al.  Patenting patterns in 25 large multinational enterprises , 1987 .

[20]  T. Kealey.  The Economic Laws of Scientific Research , 1996 .

[21]  Alexander Gerybadze,et al.  Globalization of R&D: recent changes in the management of innovation in transnational corporations , 1999 .

[22]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  The Technological Specialization of Advanced Countries: A Report to the EEC on International Science and Technology Activities , 1992 .