A problem-structuring model for analyzing transportation-environment relationships

This study discusses a decision support framework that guides policy makers in their strategic transportation related decisions by using multi-methodology. For this purpose, a methodology for analyzing the effects of transportation policies on environment, society, economy, and energy is proposed. In the proposed methodology, a three-stage problem structuring model is developed. Initially, experts' opinions are structured by using a cognitive map to determine the relationships between transportation and environmental concepts. Then a structural equation model (SEM) is constructed, based on the cognitive map, to quantify the relations among external transportation and environmental factors. Finally the results of the SEM model are used to evaluate the consequences of possible policies via scenario analysis. In this paper a pilot study that covers only one module of the whole framework, namely transportation-environment interaction module, is conducted to present the applicability and usefulness of the methodology. This pilot study also reveals the impacts of transportation policies on the environment. To achieve a sustainable transportation system, the extent of the relationships between transportation and the environment must be considered. The World Development Indicators developed by the World Bank are used for this purpose.

[1]  Celik Parkan,et al.  Measurement of the performance of an investment bank using the operational competitiveness rating procedure , 1999 .

[2]  Roberto Wolfler Calvo,et al.  STEEDS: A strategic transport-energy-environment decision support , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[3]  Xianggui Qu,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis , 2007, Technometrics.

[4]  K. Gwilliam.  Cities on the Move : A World Bank Urban Transport Strategy Review , 2002 .

[5]  Dimitrios A. Tsamboulas,et al.  TRANS-POL: A mediator between transportation models and decision makers' policies , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[6]  Eddie W. L. Cheng,et al.  SEM being more effective than multiple regression in parimonious model testing for management development research , 2001 .

[7]  Füsun Ülengin,et al.  A Bayesian causal map for inflation analysis: The case of Turkey , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  A. Goldberger,et al.  Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences. , 1974 .

[9]  E. Kelloway.  Using LISREL for Structural Equation Modeling: A Researcher′s Guide , 1998 .

[10]  Colin Eden,et al.  Strategic thinking with computers , 1990 .

[11]  Chris T. Kiranoudis,et al.  A GIS-based decision support system for planning urban transportation policies , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  M Crass.  IMPLEMENTING SUSTAINABLE URBAN TRAVEL POLICIES , 2002 .

[13]  Maurie J. Cohen.  The roots of sustainability science: a tribute to Gilbert F. White , 2006 .

[14]  Prakash P. Shenoy,et al.  A causal mapping approach to constructing Bayesian networks , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[15]  Yannis A. Phillis,et al.  Sustainability: an ill-defined concept and its assessment using fuzzy logic , 2001 .

[16]  Gert Asmund,et al.  Ministry of Environment and Energy National Environmental Research Institute , 2001 .

[17]  F. B. Vernadat,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs , 1994 .

[18]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Fuzzy multicriteria analysis for performance evaluation of bus companies , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  K. Langfield-Smith.  EXPLORING THE NEED FOR A SHARED COGNITIVE MAP , 1992 .

[20]  Komaragiri Srinivasa Raju,et al.  Multicriterion decision making in river basin planning and development , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[22]  David P. Tegarden,et al.  Group cognitive mapping: a methodology and system for capturing and evaluating managerial and organizational cognition , 2003 .

[23]  K. Jöreskog.  A General Method for Estimating a Linear Structural Equation System. , 1970 .

[24]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Globalisation, transport and the environment: new perspectives for ecological economics , 1999 .

[25]  H. James Nelson,et al.  Revealed causal mapping as an evocative method for information systems research , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[26]  J. R. Scotti,et al.  Available From , 1973 .

[27]  E. Aktas,et al.  An Integrated Transportation Decision Support System for Transportation Policy Decisions: The Case of Turkey , 2007 .

[28]  Colin Eden,et al.  Analyzing cognitive maps to help structure issues or problems , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[29]  Chung-Hsing Yeh,et al.  Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights , 2000, Comput. Oper. Res..

[30]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Latent variable scores and their uses , 2004 .

[31]  J. Fiksel.  Sustainability and Resilience: Toward a Systems Approach , 2006, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[32]  Dennis A. Gioia,et al.  Mapping Strategic Thought. , 1992 .

[33]  Y. Ilker Topcu,et al.  An integrated decision aid system for Bosphorus water-crossing problem , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  Todd Litman,et al.  Indicators and performance measures for Transportation , Environment and Sustainability in North America Report from a , 2001 .

[35]  Andrew Wirth,et al.  Measuring Differences Between Cognitive Maps , 1992 .

[36]  Jonathan Shaw,et al.  Assessing the potential for a ‘railway renaissance’ in Great Britain , 2003 .

[37]  Toru Nakamura.  WHITE PAPER, European transport policy for 2010 : time to decide , 2004 .

[38]  R. L. Keeney,et al.  Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-Offs , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[39]  D. Kaplan.  Structural Equation Modeling: Foundations and Extensions , 2000 .

[40]  Prakash P. Shenoy,et al.  A Bayesian network approach to making inferences in causal maps , 2001, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[41]  C. Eden,et al.  The analysis of cause maps , 1992 .

[42]  Craig A. Stow,et al.  Exploring ecological patterns with structural equation modeling and Bayesian analysis , 2006 .

[43]  Ronald D. Anderson,et al.  Causal modeling alternatives in operations research: Overview and application , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[44]  Le-Le Zou,et al.  The impacting factors of vulnerability to natural hazards in China: an analysis based on structural equation model , 2012, Natural Hazards.

[45]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 1981 .

[46]  Linda Steg,et al.  SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORTATION AND QUALITY OF LIFE. , 2005 .

[47]  Umit Ozen.  ANALYZING STRATEGIC THOUGHTS OF CORPORATIONS BASED ON COGNITIVE MAP , 2001 .

[48]  T. Stewart.  A CRITICAL SURVEY ON THE STATUS OF MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION MAKING THEORY AND PRACTICE , 1992 .

[49]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Cognitive mapping expert views for policy analysis in the public sector , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[50]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions , 1979, Oper. Res..

[51]  Dominic Stead,et al.  The integration of land use planning, transport and environment in European policy and research , 2003 .

[52]  J. Pearl.  Graphs, Causality, and Structural Equation Models , 1998 .

[53]  A. Goldberger,et al.  Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences. , 1974 .

[54]  Sumeet Gupta,et al.  Linking structural equation modeling to Bayesian networks: Decision support for customer retention in virtual communities , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[55]  Adamantios Diamantopoulos,et al.  Introducing Lisrel: A Guide for the Uninitiated , 2000 .

[56]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Methods and Applications , 1992, Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems.

[57]  Marc Roubens,et al.  Multiple criteria decision making , 1994 .

[58]  Barbara C. Richardson,et al.  SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT: ANALYSIS FRAMEWORKS , 2005 .

[59]  Komaragiri Srinivasa Raju,et al.  Multicriterion decision making in performance evaluation of an irrigation system , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..