Team consolidation, social integration and scientists’ research performance: An empirical study in the Biology and Biomedicine field

The effects of team consolidation and social integration on individual scientists’ activity and performance were investigated by analysing the relationships between these factors and scientists’ productivity, impact, collaboration patterns, participation in funded research projects and programs, contribution to the training of junior researchers, and prestige. Data were obtained from a survey of researchers ascribed to the Biology and Biomedicine area of the Spanish Council for Scientific Research, and from their curricula vitae. The results show that high levels of team consolidation and of integration of the scientist within his or her team are factors which might help create the most favourable social climate for research performance and productivity. Researchers who carried out their activity in a social climate characterized by these factors participated in more domestic research projects and supervised more doctoral dissertations than the rest of their colleagues. They were also more productive, as shown by the higher number of papers published in journals included in the Journal Citation Reports and the higher number of patents granted. These metrics are the main indicators taken into account in the evaluation of the research activity of Spanish scientists, and are therefore the activities that scientists invest the most energy in with a view to obtaining professional recognition. The results corroborate the importance of research teamwork, and draw attention to the importance of teamwork understood not as two or more scientists working together to solve a problem, but as a complex process involving interactions and interpersonal relations within a particular contextual framework

[1]  Nicolas Carayol,et al.  Does research organization influence academic production?: Laboratory level evidence from a large European university , 2004 .

[2]  Jens-Christian Smeby,et al.  Departmental Contexts and Faculty Research Activity in Norway , 2005 .

[3]  H. P. Sims,et al.  Top Management Team Demography and Process: The Role of Social Integration and Communication , 1994 .

[4]  Jesús Rey-Rocha,et al.  Exploring social integration as a determinant of research activity, performance and prestige of scientists. Empirical evidence in the Biology and Biomedicine field , 2007, Scientometrics.

[5]  Günter Küppers,et al.  Science as a Self-Organizing System Outline of a Theoretical Model , 1990 .

[6]  M. Turner.  GROUPS AT WORK: THEORY AND RESEARCH , 2002 .

[7]  I. Steiner.  Group process and productivity , 1972 .

[8]  Charles Jennings,et al.  Citation Data: The Wrong Impact? * * Reprinted with permission from Nature Neuroscience, 1, December, 1998, 641-643. , 2001, Cortex.

[9]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[10]  Emilio Muñoz,et al.  Lessons from an evaluation of Spanish public-sector biomedical research , 1996 .

[11]  Nick von Tunzelmann,et al.  The Effects of Size on Research Performance: A SPRU Review , 2003 .

[12]  M. Esquinas,et al.  El sistema de incentivos y recompensas en la ciencia pública española , 2005 .

[13]  Halil Dundar,et al.  DETERMINANTS OF RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY IN HIGHER EDUCATION , 1998 .

[14]  JESÚS REY-ROCHA,et al.  Scientists' performance and consolidation of research teams in Biology and Biomedicine at the Spanish Council for Scientific Research , 2006, Scientometrics.

[15]  Víctor de Lorenzo Prieto.  La investigación biomédica , 2000 .

[16]  J. S. Long,et al.  Organizational Context and Scientific Productivity , 1981 .