Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Uterine Cervical Cancer

Purpose: To determine the feasibility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (DWI) of uterine cervical cancer and to investigate whether the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of cervical cancer differ from those of normal cervix and whether they could indicate the histologic type and the pathologic grade of tumor. Materials and Methods: Forty-two female patients with histopathologically proven uterine cervical cancer and 15 female patients with uterine leiomyomas underwent preoperative MR examinations using a 1.5-T clinical scanner (GE 1.5T Twin-Speed Infinity with Excite II scanner; GE Healthcare, Waukesha, Wis). Scanning sequences included T2-weighted fast spin-echo imaging, T2-weighted fast spin-echo with fat suppression imaging, T1-weighted spin-echo imaging, and DWI with diffusion factors of 0 and 1000 s/mm2. Parameters evaluated consisted of ADC values of uterine cervical cancer and normal cervix. Histologic specimens were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The cellular densities of 32 uterine cervical cancers were calculated, which were regarded as the ratio of the total area of tumor cell nuclei divided by the area of sample image. Results: Apparent diffusion coefficient value was statistically different (P = 0.000) between normal and cancerous tissue in the uterine cervix; the former one was (mean [SD], 1.50 [0.16]) × 10−3mm2/s, and the latter one was (0.88 [0.15]) × 10−3mm2/s. Apparent diffusion coefficient value of squamous carcinoma was statistically lower than that of adenocarcinoma (P = 0.040). The ADC value of uterine cervical cancer correlated negatively with cellular density (r = −0.711, P = 0.000) and the grading of tumor (r = −0.778, P = 0.000). Conclusions: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging has a potential ability to differentiate between normal and cancerous tissue in the uterine cervix, and it can indicate the histologic type of uterine cervical cancer as well. The ADC value of uterine cervical cancer represents tumor cellular density, thus providing a new method for evaluating the pathologic grading of tumor.

[1]  Namkug Kim,et al.  Feasibility of diffusion‐weighted imaging in the differentiation of metastatic from nonmetastatic lymph nodes: Early experience , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  Masoom A. Haider,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MRI in cervical cancer , 2008, European Radiology.

[3]  Ronald Ouwerkerk,et al.  AAPM/RSNA physics tutorials for residents: MR imaging: brief overview and emerging applications. , 2007, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[4]  R. Reznek,et al.  The performance of magnetic resonance imaging in early cervical carcinoma: a long‐term experience , 2007, International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society.

[5]  M. Matoba,et al.  Lung carcinoma: diffusion-weighted mr imaging--preliminary evaluation with apparent diffusion coefficient. , 2007, Radiology.

[6]  T. Hirai,et al.  Malignant supratentorial astrocytoma treated with postoperative radiation therapy: prognostic value of pretreatment quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging. , 2007, Radiology.

[7]  I. Narabayashi,et al.  Diffusion-weighed MR imaging of pancreatic carcinoma , 2007, Abdominal Imaging.

[8]  Frederik De Keyzer,et al.  Extracranial applications of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, European Radiology.

[9]  Sukru Mehmet Erturk,et al.  High-B-value diffusion-weighted MRI in colorectal cancer. , 2006, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[10]  S. F. Carbone,et al.  Magnetic resonance diffusion–weighted imaging: extraneurological applications , 2006, La radiologia medica.

[11]  Fuminari Tatsugami,et al.  Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for urinary bladder carcinoma: initial results , 2006, European Radiology.

[12]  G. Engin.  Cervical cancer: MR imaging findings before, during, and after radiation therapy , 2006, European Radiology.

[13]  N. Villari,et al.  The diffusion parameter in magnetic resonance: physics, techniques, and semeiotics. , 2005, La Radiologia medica.

[14]  N. Moriyama,et al.  Diffusion-weighted single shot echo planar imaging of colorectal cancer using a sensitivity-encoding technique. , 2004, Japanese journal of clinical oncology.

[15]  Takeo Ishigaki,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficient in cervical cancer of the uterus: comparison with the normal uterine cervix , 2004, European Radiology.

[16]  P. Silverman,et al.  Diagnosis, staging, and surveillance of cervical carcinoma. , 2003, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[17]  James M Provenzale,et al.  Lymphomas and high-grade astrocytomas: comparison of water diffusibility and histologic characteristics. , 2002, Radiology.

[18]  Toshinori Hirai,et al.  Usefulness of diffusion‐weighted MRI with echo‐planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[19]  A M Takahashi,et al.  ADC mapping by means of a single‐shot spiral MRI technique with application in acute cerebral ischemia , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[20]  M. Bahn,et al.  CT and MRI of stroke , 1996, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.