Guideline-based indicators for adult patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.

Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) represent a heterogeneous group of hematological stem cell disorders with an increasing burden on health care systems. Evidence-based MDS guidelines and recommendations (G/Rs) are published but do not necessarily translate into better quality of care if adherence is not maintained in daily clinical practice. Guideline-based indicators (GBIs) are measurable elements for the standardized assessment of quality of care and, thus far, have not been developed for adult MDS patients. To this end, we screened relevant G/Rs published between 1999 and 2018 and aggregated all available information as candidate GBIs into a formalized handbook as the basis for the subsequent consensus rating procedure. An international multidisciplinary expert panel group (EPG) of acknowledged MDS experts (n = 17), health professionals (n = 7), and patient advocates (n = 5) was appointed. The EPG feedback rates for the first and second round were 82% (23 of 28) and 96% (26 of 27), respectively. A final set of 29 GBIs for the 3 domains of diagnosis (n = 14), therapy (n = 8), and provider/infrastructural characteristics (n = 7) achieved the predefined agreement score for selection (>70%). We identified shortcomings in standardization of patient-reported outcomes, toxicity, and geriatric assessments that need to be optimized in the future. Our GBIs represent the first comprehensive consensus on measurable elements addressing best practice performance, outcomes, and structural resources. They can be used as a standardized instrument with the goal of assessing, comparing, and fostering good quality of care within clinical development cycles in the daily care of adult MDS patients.

[1]  U. Siebert,et al.  Development of a core outcome set for myelodysplastic syndromes – a Delphi study from the EUMDS Registry Group , 2020, British journal of haematology.

[2]  M. Cazzola,et al.  Luspatercept in Patients with Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes. , 2020, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  U. Germing,et al.  Combined Retro- and Prospective Analysis of Adherence to Guidelines and Patient-Tailored Therapeutic Recommendations in Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) at a Tertiary Care Centre , 2019, Blood.

[4]  F. Thol,et al.  Do next-generation sequencing results drive diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in MDS? , 2019, Blood advances.

[5]  E. Such,et al.  Do next-generation sequencing results drive diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in MDS? , 2019, Blood advances.

[6]  Paul A. Harris,et al.  The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners , 2019, J. Biomed. Informatics.

[7]  R. Hays,et al.  The challenge of determining appropriate care in the era of patient-centered care and rising health care costs , 2018, Journal of health services research & policy.

[8]  E. Ejerblad,et al.  Prognostic scoring systems for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) in a population‐based setting: a report from the Swedish MDS register , 2018, British journal of haematology.

[9]  P. Sonneveld,et al.  MDS classification is improving in an era of the WHO 2016 criteria of MDS: A population-based analysis among 9159 MDS patients diagnosed in the Netherlands. , 2017, Cancer epidemiology.

[10]  A. Ganser,et al.  Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for MDS and CMML: recommendations from an international expert panel. , 2017, Blood.

[11]  V. Arndt,et al.  Trends of classification, incidence, mortality, and survival of MDS patients in Switzerland between 2001 and 2012. , 2017, Cancer epidemiology.

[12]  Yin Xu,et al.  CD5-Negative Mantle Cell Leukemia Shows Frequent 17p Deletion and Marrow Involvement Mimicking Marginal Zone Lymphoma , 2016 .

[13]  G. Abel,et al.  Assessing Quality of Care for the Myelodysplastic Syndromes , 2016, Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports.

[14]  Mario Cazzola,et al.  The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. , 2016, Blood.

[15]  H. Uno,et al.  Influence of patient and provider characteristics on quality of care for the myelodysplastic syndromes , 2016, British journal of haematology.

[16]  A. Chiang Why the Quality Oncology Practice Initiative Matters: It's Not Just About Cost. , 2016, American Society of Clinical Oncology educational book. American Society of Clinical Oncology. Annual Meeting.

[17]  L. Godley,et al.  How I diagnose and manage individuals at risk for inherited myeloid malignancies. , 2016, Blood.

[18]  C. Cogle,et al.  Incidence and Burden of the Myelodysplastic Syndromes , 2015, Current Hematologic Malignancy Reports.

[19]  C. Kowalski,et al.  Reporting program for cancer care quality indicators. , 2015, Journal of oncology practice.

[20]  P. Sonneveld,et al.  The use of medical claims to assess incidence, diagnostic procedures and initial treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia in the Netherlands. , 2015, Leukemia research.

[21]  D. Neuberg,et al.  Somatic mutations predict poor outcome in patients with myelodysplastic syndrome after hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[22]  C. Buske,et al.  Myelodysplastic syndromes: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. , 2014, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[23]  P. Campbell,et al.  Driver somatic mutations identify distinct disease entities within myeloid neoplasms with myelodysplasia. , 2014, Blood.

[24]  P. Vyas,et al.  Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of adult myelodysplastic syndromes , 2014, British journal of haematology.

[25]  P. Shekelle Quality indicators and performance measures: methods for development need more standardization. , 2013, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[26]  U. Germing,et al.  The impact of age on the diagnosis and therapy of myelodysplastic syndromes: results from a retrospective multicenter analysis in Germany , 2013, European journal of haematology.

[27]  M. Cazzola,et al.  Diagnosis and treatment of primary myelodysplastic syndromes in adults: recommendations from the European LeukemiaNet. , 2013, Blood.

[28]  Ronald B. Moore,et al.  Using the Delphi technique to improve clinical outcomes through the development of quality indicators in renal cell carcinoma. , 2013, Journal of oncology practice.

[29]  Luca Malcovati,et al.  Revised international prognostic scoring system for myelodysplastic syndromes. , 2012, Blood.

[30]  M. Scherer,et al.  Methods for the guideline-based development of quality indicators--a systematic review , 2012, Implementation Science.

[31]  D. Neuberg,et al.  Clinical effect of point mutations in myelodysplastic syndromes. , 2011, The New England journal of medicine.

[32]  O. Sibony,et al.  Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review , 2011, PloS one.

[33]  P. Greenberg Myelodysplastic syndromes: dissecting the heterogeneity. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[34]  J. Raemaekers,et al.  Development and measurement of guideline-based indicators for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 2011, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[35]  M. Porter,et al.  What is value in health care? , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[36]  C. Ko,et al.  National assessment of melanoma care using formally developed quality indicators. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[37]  G. Westert,et al.  Effects of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on quality of care: a systematic review , 2009, Quality and Safety in Health Care.

[38]  M. Cazzola,et al.  Clinical relevance of bone marrow fibrosis and CD34-positive cell clusters in primary myelodysplastic syndromes. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[39]  M. Sorror,et al.  Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT)-specific comorbidity index: a new tool for risk assessment before allogeneic HCT. , 2005, Blood.

[40]  Benjamin A Spencer,et al.  Quality-of-care indicators for early-stage prostate cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  A. Hutchinson,et al.  Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[42]  I. Dybedal,et al.  A validated decision model for treating the anaemia of myelodysplastic syndromes with erythropoietin + granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor: significant effects on quality of life , 2003, British journal of haematology.

[43]  Robert M Califf,et al.  Integrating quality into the cycle of therapeutic development. , 2002, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[44]  A. Hutchinson,et al.  Research methods used in developing and applying quality indicators in primary care , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[45]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Clinical guidelines: developing guidelines. , 1999, BMJ.

[46]  Andrew D Oxman,et al.  Closing the gap between research and practice : an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings , 2011 .

[47]  T Hamblin,et al.  International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes. , 1997, Blood.

[48]  M. Lawrence,et al.  Indicators of Quality in Health Care , 1997 .

[49]  Ketelaars Ca Using the RUMBA requirements in developing criteria. , 1994 .

[50]  C. Ketelaars Using the RUMBA requirements in developing criteria. , 1994, Nursing quality connection.

[51]  J. Grimshaw,et al.  Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations , 1993, The Lancet.

[52]  R. Lasker,et al.  Containing costs while improving quality of care: the role of profiling and practice guidelines. , 1993, Annual review of public health.