Cross-task cross talk in memory and perception.

The application of the additive factors method depends on finding factors that selectively influence processing stages. When all the processes for a task are in series, a factor directly influencing a process might change its output and thereby have indirect influence on succeeding processes. We investigate whether such indirect influence is possible between processes associated with different tasks being performed together. In two dual-task memory scanning and arithmetic experiments with digits as the stimuli for both tasks, information relevant for only one of the tasks nonetheless affected performance of the other. When the same digit was relevant for the two tasks, cross-task facilitation and interference were observed in some cases. Displaying the same digit for both tasks led to relatively fast response times, paralleling the effect of flankers in the response competition paradigm. But repetition of digits in memory slowed responses. It is suggested that the need for control processes to keep task information segregated is responsible for the pattern of effects.

[1]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[2]  Marc A. Sullivan,et al.  Coordinating information from perception and working memory , 1993 .

[3]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Micro Experimental Laboratory: An integrated system for IBM PC compatibles , 1988 .

[4]  Richard Schweickert,et al.  A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a stroop task , 1978 .

[5]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task , 1974 .

[6]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[7]  J. Hoffman,et al.  Recognition memory and attentional selection: serial scanning is not enough. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[8]  James T. Townsend,et al.  A trichotomy: Interactions of factors prolonging sequential and concurrent mental processes in stochastic discrete mental (PERT) networks , 1989 .

[9]  P. Suppes,et al.  Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology , 1976 .

[10]  D. Navon,et al.  Role of outcome conflict in dual-task interference. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  R. B. Freeman,et al.  Cognition and Motor Processes , 1983 .

[12]  J. Townsend,et al.  Stochastic dependencies in parallel and serial models: effects on systems factorial interactions , 1994 .

[13]  Andries F. Sanders,et al.  S-Oh-R: Oh Stages! Oh Resources! , 1984 .

[14]  W. Hirst,et al.  Characterizing attentional resources. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[15]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Toward the trichotomy method of reaction times: laying the foundation of stochastic mental networks , 1989 .

[16]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Discrete and continuous models of human information processing: theoretical distinctions and empirical results. , 1988, Acta psychologica.

[17]  Richard C. Atkinson,et al.  Search and decision processes in recognition memory. , 1974 .