Information theoretic inference of the optimal number of electrodes for future cochlear implants using a spiral cochlea model

Contemporary cochlear implants stimulate the auditory nerve with an array of up to 22 electrodes. More electrodes do not typically provide improved hearing performance. Given that this limitation is primarily due to current spread, and that newly developing kinds of electrodes may enable more focused stimulation, we recently proposed an information theoretic modeling framework for estimating how many electrodes might achieve optimal hearing performance under a range of assumptions about electrodes and their placement relative to the nerve. Here, we extend this approach by introducing more realistic three-dimensional spiral geometries for the cochlea and array, and comparing the optimal number of electrodes predicted by our model for this case with that in our original model, which used a linear geometry.

[1]  Johan H. M. Frijns,et al.  Consensus Panel on a Cochlear Coordinate System Applicable in Histologic, Physiologic, and Radiologic Studies of the Human Cochlea , 2010, Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology.

[2]  Mark D. McDonnell,et al.  A Channel Model for Inferring the Optimal Number of Electrodes for Future Cochlear Implants , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[3]  Blake S. Wilson,et al.  Cochlear implants: A remarkable past and a brilliant future , 2008, Hearing Research.

[4]  I.C. Bruce,et al.  The effects of stochastic neural activity in a model predicting intensity perception with cochlear implants: low-rate stimulation , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Jay T. Rubinstein,et al.  Stochastic Population Model for Electrical Stimulation of the Auditory Nerve , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[6]  Fan-Gang Zeng,et al.  Cochlear Implants: System Design, Integration, and Evaluation , 2008, IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  R. Quiroga,et al.  Extracting information from neuronal populations : information theory and decoding approaches , 2022 .

[8]  M. Charles Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. II. Stereocilia damage and alterations of spontaneous discharge rates , 1984, Hearing Research.

[9]  Mark D. McDonnell,et al.  An introductory review of information theory in the context of computational neuroscience , 2011, Biological Cybernetics.

[10]  D H Johnson,et al.  Analysis of discharges recorded simultaneously from pairs of auditory nerve fibers. , 1976, Biophysical journal.

[11]  Johan H. M. Frijns,et al.  The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: A model approach , 2006, Hearing Research.

[12]  Patrick Boyle,et al.  The Effect of Gaussian Noise on the Threshold, Dynamic Range, and Loudness of Analogue Cochlear Implant Stimuli , 2007, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.

[13]  M. White,et al.  A stochastic model of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve: pulse-train response , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[14]  Yuhong Yang Elements of Information Theory (2nd ed.). Thomas M. Cover and Joy A. Thomas , 2008 .

[15]  Ge Wang,et al.  Three-dimensional geometric modeling of the cochlea , 2000, Medical Imaging: Image Processing.

[16]  Johan H. M. Frijns,et al.  Unraveling the electrically evoked compound action potential , 2005, Hearing Research.