Cost‐Reducing Innovation and the Role of Patent Intermediaries in Increasing Market Efficiency
暂无分享,去创建一个
Sameer Hasija | Shantanu Bhattacharya | Anupam Agrawal | S. Bhattacharya | Sameer Hasija | A. Agrawal
[1] Andrea Fosfuri. The Licensing Dilemma: Understanding the Determinants of the Rate of Technology Licensing , 2006 .
[2] Y. Tauman,et al. Optimal licensing of cost-reducing innovation , 1992 .
[3] Rosemarie H. Ziedonis. Don't Fence Me in: Fragmented Markets for Technology and the Patent Acquisition Strategies of Firms , 2003, Manag. Sci..
[4] Mark A. Lemley,et al. Journal of Economic Perspectives—Volume 19, Number 2—Spring 2005—Pages 75–98 Probabilistic Patents , 2022 .
[5] Stephen M. Gilbert,et al. Implications of Channel Structure for Leasing or Selling Durable Goods , 2009, Mark. Sci..
[6] Markus Reitzig,et al. On sharks, trolls, and their patent prey—Unrealistic damage awards and firms’ strategies of “being infringed” , 2007 .
[7] C. Tam,et al. Cost-Reducing Innovation Collaboration in Supply Chain Management , 2007, 2007 International Conference on Wireless Communications, Networking and Mobile Computing.
[8] Nicos Savva,et al. Opt‐Out Options in New Product Co‐development Partnerships , 2014 .
[9] James Bessen,et al. The Private and Social Costs of Patent Trolls , 2011 .
[10] Stuart J.H. Graham,et al. Why Do Start-Ups Patent? , 2008 .
[11] Sudheer Gupta,et al. Research Note - Channel Structure with Knowledge Spillovers , 2008, Mark. Sci..
[12] Ashish Arora,et al. Patent Protection, Complementary Assets, and Firms' Incentives for Technology Licensing , 2004, Manag. Sci..
[13] Yi Xu,et al. The Impact of Royalty Contract Revision in a Multistage Strategic R&D Alliance , 2012, Manag. Sci..
[14] K. Leffler,et al. Transactions Costs and the Efficient Organization of Production: A Study of Timber-Harvesting Contracts , 1991, Journal of Political Economy.
[15] M. Reitzig,et al. Collateral damage for R&D manufacturers: how patent sharks operate in markets for technology , 2010 .
[16] David C. Mowery,et al. Learning to Patent: Institutional Experience, Learning, and the Characteristics of U.S. University Patents After the Bayh-Dole Act, 1981-1992 , 2002 .
[17] M. Ceccagnoli. Appropriability, Preemption, and Firm Performance , 2007 .
[18] Peter R. Dickson,et al. Getting Return on Quality: Revenue Expansion, Cost Reduction, or Both? , 2002 .
[19] B. RenÃ,et al. Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance , 2004 .
[20] Bowon Kim,et al. Coordinating an innovation in supply chain management , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..
[21] Anne Layne-Farrar,et al. Elves or trolls? The role of non-practicing patent owners in the innovation economy , 2012 .
[22] Lihui Lin,et al. Impact of Licensing on Investment and Financing of Technology Development , 2006, Manag. Sci..
[23] Wesley M. Cohen,et al. What's Experience Got to Do With It? Sources of Cost Reduction in a Large Specialty Chemicals Producer , 2000 .
[24] Yi Xu,et al. Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving , 2008, Manag. Sci..
[25] Sanjiv Erat,et al. Introduction of New Technologies to Competing Industrial Customers , 2006, Manag. Sci..
[26] Tarun Kabiraj. Patent Licensing in a Leadership Structure , 2004 .
[27] Sandra Rothenberg,et al. Suppliers and Environmental Innovation: The Automotive Paint Process , 2000 .
[28] Y. Tauman,et al. Fees Versus Royalties and the Private Value of a Patent , 1986 .
[29] Stylianos Kavadias,et al. A Theoretical Framework for Managing the New Product Development Portfolio: When and How to Use Strategic Buckets , 2008, Manag. Sci..
[30] X. Wang,et al. Fee versus royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model , 1998 .
[31] Nathan Rosenberg,et al. Special Issue on University Entrepreneurship and Technology Transfer: How Do University Inventions Get Into Practice? , 2002, Manag. Sci..
[32] Sudheer Gupta,et al. Process Innovation, Product Differentiation, and Channel Structure: Strategic Incentives in a Duopoly , 1998 .
[33] Fred M. Gerguras. Intellectual property protection in the USA , 1987 .
[34] Ashby H. B. Monk. The Emerging Market for Intellectual Property: Drivers, Restrainers, and Implications , 2008 .
[35] Roberto Mazzoleni,et al. How Do University Inventions Get into Practice ? , 2000 .
[36] Allen W. Wang. Rise of the Patent Intermediaries , 2010 .
[37] Julie A. Hedlund. Patents Pending: Patent Reform for the Innovation Economy , 2007 .
[38] Sanjiv Erat,et al. Managing Delegated Search Over Design Spaces , 2012, Manag. Sci..
[39] Fernando Bernstein,et al. Dynamic Cost Reduction Through Process Improvement in Assembly Networks , 2009, Manag. Sci..
[40] Praveen Kumar,et al. Optimal Patenting and Licensing of Financial Innovations , 2008, Manag. Sci..
[41] Stephen M. Gilbert,et al. Strategic interactions between channel structure and demand enhancing services , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..
[42] Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al. The role of innovation intermediaries in the markets for technology , 2011 .
[43] Ron Adner,et al. Disruptive Technologies and the Emergence of Competition , 2003 .
[44] Yair Tauman,et al. General licensing schemes for a cost-reducing innovation , 2007, Games Econ. Behav..
[45] David B. Yoffie,et al. The New Patent Intermediaries: Platforms, Defensive Aggregators and Super-Aggregators , 2013 .
[46] Scott Shane,et al. The Halo Effect and Technology Licensing: The Influence of Institutional Prestige on the Licensing of University Inventions , 2003, Manag. Sci..
[47] Michael L. Katz,et al. On the licensing of innovations , 1985 .
[48] Joachim Henkel,et al. Patent Trolls on Markets for Technology - An Empirical Analysis of Trolls' Patent Acquisitions , 2010 .