Decimals are not processed automatically, not even as being smaller than one.

Common fractions have been found to be processed intentionally but not automatically, which led to the conclusion that they are not represented holistically in long-term memory. However, decimals are more similar to natural numbers in their form and thus might be better candidates to be holistically represented by educated adults. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the automatic processing of decimals by college students in 4 experiments. When decimals were presented in a familiar form (e.g., 0.3, 0.05) the length of the stimuli (i.e., the number of digits) dominated performance rather than the decimal value. When controlling for the number of digits and their location within the digit string, using the place-value task, decimals were not processed automatically in either a numerical comparison task or a physical comparison task. Under the same conditions, natural numbers were processed automatically. We conclude that decimals are not represented holistically. Results of mixed pairs of a decimal and a natural number suggest that, unlike common fractions, decimals are not automatically perceived as smaller than natural numbers. We conclude that decimal place-values (e.g., tenths, hundredths) are not represented well enough to be automatically activated, and we discuss possible explanations.

[1]  Arava Y. Kallai,et al.  When meaningful components interrupt the processing of the whole: the case of fractions. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[2]  Yujing Ni,et al.  Teaching and Learning Fraction and Rational Numbers: The Origins and Implications of Whole Number Bias , 2005 .

[3]  Y. Okamoto,et al.  Language supports for children's understanding of numerical fractions: cross-national comparisons. , 1999, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  S. Vosniadou,et al.  The development of students’ understanding of the numerical value of fractions , 2004 .

[5]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  A Neural Model of How The Brain Represents and Compares Numbers , 2010 .

[6]  Dana Ganor-Stern Are 1/2 and 0.5 represented in the same way? , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[7]  Dana Ganor-Stern,et al.  Automaticity in Processing Ordinal Information , 2004 .

[8]  Florence Gabriel,et al.  Developing Children’s Understanding of Fractions : An Intervention Study , 2012 .

[9]  Dana Ganor-Stern,et al.  The Representation of Negative Numbers: Exploring the Effects of Mode of Processing and Notation , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[10]  J. Tzelgov,et al.  Holistic representation of unit fractions. , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[11]  M. Schocke,et al.  The processing and representation of fractions within the brain. An fMRI investigation. , 2009, NeuroImage.

[12]  Dana Ganor-Stern Fractions but not negative numbers are represented on the mental number line. , 2012, Acta psychologica.

[13]  Dana Ganor-Stern,et al.  Primitives and Non-primitives of Numerical Representations , 2015 .

[14]  A. Henik,et al.  Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks , 1982, Memory & cognition.

[15]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Rapid Communication: Understanding the Real Value of Fractions and Decimals , 2011, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[16]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[17]  Arava Y. Kallai,et al.  A generalized fraction: an entity smaller than one on the mental number line. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  Guilherme Wood,et al.  Neural representations of two-digit numbers: A parametric fMRI study , 2006, NeuroImage.

[19]  A memory-based account of automatic numerosity processing , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[20]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins , 2001, Cognition.

[21]  Stephen Grossberg,et al.  A neural model of how the brain represents and compares multi-digit numbers: spatial and categorical processes , 2003, Neural Networks.

[22]  J. Bargh The ecology of automaticity: toward establishing the conditions needed to produce automatic processing effects. , 1992, The American journal of psychology.

[23]  J Tzelgov,et al.  Specifying the relations between automaticity and consciousness: a theoretical note. , 1997, Consciousness and cognition.

[24]  Dana Ganor-Stern,et al.  Negative numbers are generated in the mind. , 2008, Experimental psychology.

[25]  Miriam Bassok,et al.  Magnitude comparison with different types of rational numbers. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Sashank Varma,et al.  Understanding decimal proportions: Discrete representations, parallel access, and privileged processing of zero , 2013, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  L. Resnick,et al.  Conceptual Bases of Arithmetic Errors: The Case of Decimal Fractions. , 1989 .

[28]  J. Moss Developing Children's Understanding of the Rational Numbers: A New Model and an Experimental Curriculum , 1999 .

[29]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Rational numbers: Componential versus holistic representation of fractions in a magnitude comparison task , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[30]  P. Nesher,et al.  Shifts in reasoning , 1986 .

[31]  Michaël A. Stevens,et al.  A model of exact small-number representation , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  T. P. Carpenter What Are the Chances of Your Students Knowing Probability , 1981 .

[33]  K Moeller,et al.  Two-digit number processing: holistic, decomposed or hybrid? A computational modelling approach , 2011, Psychological research.

[34]  Jacques Grégoire,et al.  Developmental changes in the comparison of decimal fractions , 2010 .

[35]  Andreas Nieder,et al.  Notation-Independent Representation of Fractions in the Human Parietal Cortex , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  X. Seron,et al.  The mental representation of the magnitude of symbolic and nonsymbolic ratios in adults , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[37]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Comparing the magnitude of two fractions with common components: which representations are used by 10- and 12-year-olds? , 2010, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[38]  Ipke Wachsmuth,et al.  IDENTIFYING FRACTIONS ON NUMBER LINES , 1988 .

[39]  Francois Léonard,et al.  Intermediate Cognitive Organizations in the Process of Learning a Mathematical Concept: The Order of Positive Decimal Numbers , 1985 .

[40]  Andreas Obersteiner,et al.  The natural number bias and magnitude representation in fraction comparison by expert mathematicians , 2013 .

[41]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Comparing 5/7 and 2/9: Adults can do it by accessing the magnitude of the whole fractions. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[42]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[43]  Marco Zorzi,et al.  The mental representation of numerical fractions: real or integer? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  G. Logan Toward an instance theory of automatization. , 1988 .

[45]  A. Vinter,et al.  The self-organizing consciousness. , 2002, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[46]  Dana Ganor-Stern,et al.  Automaticity of two-digit numbers. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  J. L. Myers,et al.  Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[48]  ames Hiebert and Diana Wearne Procedures Over Concepts: The Acquisition of Decimal Number Knowledge , 2013 .

[49]  Arava Y. Kallai,et al.  The place-value of a digit in multi-digit numbers is processed automatically. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[50]  Dale J Cohen,et al.  Evidence for direct retrieval of relative quantity information in a quantity judgment task: decimals, integers, and the role of physical similarity. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.