Post-cam mechanics and tibiofemoral kinematics: a dynamic in vitro analysis of eight posterior-stabilized total knee designs

PurposePosterior cruciate ligament (PCL)-substituting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) designs were introduced to avoid paradoxical roll forward of the femur and to optimize knee kinematics. The aim of this in vitro study was to investigate post-cam function and contact mechanics and relate it to knee kinematics during squatting in eight contemporary posterior-stabilized TKA designs.MethodsAll prostheses were fixed on custom-designed metal fixtures and mounted in a knee rig and five sequential-loaded squats were performed between 30° and 130° of flexion. Contact pressure and contact area were measured using pressure-sensitive Tekscan sensors on the posterior face of the post. Kinematics was recorded with reflective markers and infrared light-capturing cameras.ResultsThe post-cam mechanisms analyzed in this study are very variable in terms of design features. This leads to large variations in terms of the flexion angle at which the post and cam engage maximal contact force, contact pressure and contact area. We found that more functional post-cam mechanisms, which engage at lower flexion angle and have a similar behavior as normal PCL function, generally show more normal rollback and tibial rotation at the expense of higher contact forces and pressures. All designs show high contact forces. A positive correlation was found between contact force and initial contact angle.ConclusionPost-cam contact mechanics and kinematics were documented in a standardized setting. Post-cam contact mechanics are correlated with post-cam function. Outcomes of this study can help to develop more functional designs in future. Nevertheless, a compromise will always be made between functional requirements and risk of failure. We assume that more normal knee kinematics leads to more patient satisfaction because of better mobility. Understanding of the post-cam mechanism, and knowing how this system really works, is maybe the clue in further development of new total knee designs.

[1]  G. Scuderi**,et al.  Polyethylene post failure in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[2]  Hideki Yoshikawa,et al.  The effect of weight-bearing condition on kinematics of a high-flexion, posterior-stabilized knee prosthesis. , 2011, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  Johan Bellemans,et al.  In Vivo Kinematics after a Cruciate-substituting TKA , 2010, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[4]  K. Jung,et al.  Fractured Polyethylene Tibial Post in a Posterior-Stabilized Knee Prosthesis Presenting as a Floating Palpable Mass , 2009, The journal of knee surgery.

[5]  H Miura,et al.  Contact stress at the post-cam mechanism in posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[6]  R. Balderston,et al.  Posterior dislocation of total knee arthroplasty. , 1992, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[7]  B. K. Vaughn,et al.  Dislocation following primary posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. , 1993, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  D Wirz,et al.  [Validation of the Tekscan system for statistic and dynamic pressure measurements of the human femorotibial joint]. , 2002, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[9]  R. Komistek,et al.  In vivo kinematic evaluation and design considerations related to high flexion in total knee arthroplasty. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[10]  J. Stiehl,et al.  Fluoroscopic analysis of kinematics after posterior-cruciate-retaining knee arthroplasty. , 1995, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[11]  F. Amirouche,et al.  Optimisation of the posterior stabilised tibial post for greater femoral rollback after total knee arthroplasty—a finite element analysis , 2009, International Orthopaedics.

[12]  Y. Iwamoto,et al.  Contact stress at the anterior aspect of the tibial post in posterior-stabilized total knee replacement. , 2010, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[13]  J. Callaghan,et al.  Osteolysis Associated with a Cemented tModular Posterior-Cruciate-Substituting Total Knee Design: Five to Eight-Year Follow-up , 2002, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[14]  A. Williams,et al.  Tibio-femoral movement in the living knee. A study of weight bearing and non-weight bearing knee kinematics using 'interventional' MRI. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  E S Grood,et al.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. , 1983, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[16]  Clare K Fitzpatrick,et al.  Mechanics of post-cam engagement during simulated dynamic activity , 2013, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[17]  J. Bellemans,et al.  Posterior dislocation in total knee replacement: a price for deep flexion? , 2011, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[18]  J. Victor,et al.  How precise can bony landmarks be determined on a CT scan of the knee? , 2009, The Knee.

[19]  D. Wilson,et al.  Accuracy and repeatability of a pressure measurement system in the patellofemoral joint. , 2003, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  Johan Bellemans,et al.  Iliotibial band traction syndrome in guided motion TKA. A new clinical entity after TKA. , 2010, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[21]  A. Wymenga,et al.  Posterior cruciate ligament balancing in total knee replacement: the quantitative relationship between tightness of the flexion gap and tibial translation. , 2007, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[22]  R B Bourne,et al.  Tibial Post Wear in Posterior Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Unrecognized Source of Polyethylene Debris , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[23]  N. P. Thomas,et al.  Bicruciate substituting total knee replacement: how effective are the added kinematic constraints in vivo? , 2012, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[24]  G. Li,et al.  Cruciate-retaining and cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: an in vitro comparison of the kinematics under muscle loads. , 2001, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[25]  J. Benjamin,et al.  Early, incapacitating instability of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. , 1998, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[26]  S A Banks,et al.  In vivo kinematics of cruciate-retaining and -substituting knee arthroplasties. , 1997, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[27]  W. Jacobs,et al.  Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement for treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. , 2005, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[28]  R. Wasielewski The causes of insert backside wear in total knee arthroplasty. , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[29]  W. Jacobs,et al.  Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty for treating osteoarthritis. , 2013, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[30]  Johan Bellemans,et al.  An experimental model for kinematic analysis of the knee. , 2009, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[31]  P. Campbell,et al.  Tibial Post Impingement in Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[32]  Todd Johnson,et al.  Biomechanics of Posterior-Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty: An In Vitro Study , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[33]  J. S. Blackburne,et al.  A new method of measuring patellar height. , 1977, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[34]  A Leardini,et al.  Cruciate ligament forces in the human knee during rehabilitation exercises. , 2000, Clinical biomechanics.

[35]  M. Harris,et al.  An improved method for measuring tibiofemoral contact areas in total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of K-scan sensor and Fuji film. , 1999, Journal of biomechanics.