Approaches to quantifying forest structures

Summary For some time, structure indices ‐ quantifying spatial stand structure ‐ have been integrated into forest research and are used to provide a measure of biodiversity. In addition, correlation functions ‐ developed initially for problems outside forestry ‐ enable analysis and characterization of forest stand structures, generating more accessible information. This paper outlines a classification of structural indices measuring alpha diversity and examines typical representatives of the classification groups such as the Shannon index, the aggregation index of Clark and Evans, the contagion index, the coefficient of segregation of Pielou, the mingling index, the diameter differentiation index, the pair correlation and the mark correlation function. These can be used to measure differences between forests in time and space, to generate forest structures, to analyse the differences between observed and expected structures and to characterize modifications of forest structure resulting from selective harvesting. These algorithms are the keys for assessing complex forest structures, which can be the result of continuous cover forestry methods. Continuous cover forests with selective harvesting are being promoted in the new forest policies of Britain. Case studies have shown that from given spatial forest structures one can possibly conclude the suitability for habitats, a hypothesis which has yet to be proved by further appropriate analysis. The equations for the quantification of stand structure presented in this paper have the advantage that they are easier to survey during forest inventory than the more direct measures of ecological variety.

[1]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[2]  Thomas Smaltschinski.  Charakterisierung von Baumverteilungen , 1998, Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt vereinigt mit Tharandter forstliches Jahrbuch.

[3]  G. Upton,et al.  Point pattern and quantitative data , 1985 .

[4]  H. Pretzsch.  Structural diversity as a result of silvicultural operations , 1998 .

[5]  D. Sprugel,et al.  Disturbance, equilibrium, and environmental variability: What is ‘Natural’ vegetation in a changing environment? , 1991 .

[6]  Kenichiro Shimatani.  Multivariate point processes and spatial variation of species diversity , 2001 .

[7]  Dietrich Stoyan,et al.  The use of marked point processes in ecological and environmental forest studies , 1995, Environmental and Ecological Statistics.

[8]  Peter Kareiva,et al.  Biotic interactions and global change. , 1993 .

[9]  S. Pitkänen.  Correlation between stand structure and ground vegetation: an analytical approach , 1997, Plant Ecology.

[10]  Larry B. Crowder,et al.  An individual-based, spatially-explicit simulation model of the population dynamics of the endangered red-cockaded woodpecker, Picoides borealis , 1998 .

[11]  Matthias Dobbertin,et al.  A Comparison of Distance-Dependent Competition Measures for Height and Basal Area Growth of Individual Conifer Trees , 1992, Forest Science.

[12]  Klaus Von Gadow,et al.  Modelling Forest Development , 1998, Forestry Sciences.

[13]  Characteristics of spatial stem distributions , 1998 .

[14]  Paul F. Hessburg,et al.  A structural classification for inland northwest forest vegetation. , 1996 .

[15]  B. Ripley.  Modelling Spatial Patterns , 1977 .

[16]  R. Whittaker.  Evolution and measurement of species diversity , 1972 .

[17]  P. J. Clark,et al.  Distance to Nearest Neighbor as a Measure of Spatial Relationships in Populations , 1954 .

[18]  R. A. Monserud,et al.  Control of plot edge bias in forest stand growth simulation models , 1977 .

[19]  P. Radtke,et al.  A comparison of methods for edge-bias compensation , 1998 .

[20]  Hans Pretzsch,et al.  Analysis and modeling of spatial stand structures. Methodological considerations based on mixed beech-larch stands in Lower Saxony , 1997 .

[21]  Hans R. Zuuring,et al.  A method for quantifying vertical forest structure , 1998 .

[22]  Markus Neumann,et al.  The significance of different indices for stand structure and diversity in forests , 2001 .

[23]  Roland H. Lamberson,et al.  Conservation planning for species occupying fragmented landscapes: the case of the northern spotted owl , 1993 .

[24]  Bernard Fingleton,et al.  Spatial Data Analysis by Example, Vol. 2: Categorical and Directional Data. , 1990 .

[25]  R. Macarthur.  PATTERNS OF SPECIES DIVERSITY , 1965 .

[26]  David E. Hibbs,et al.  A new method for modeling the heterogeneity of forest structure. , 2000 .

[27]  R. Ferris,et al.  A review of potential biodiversity indicators for application in British forests , 1999 .

[28]  G. J. G. Upton,et al.  Spatial data Analysis by Example , 1985 .

[29]  A. Newton,et al.  The importance of conifer plantations in northern Britain as a habitat for native fungi , 2000 .

[30]  D. Stoyan,et al.  Neue Methoden zur Analyse und Charakterisierung von Bestandesstrukturen , 2000, Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt vereinigt mit Tharandter forstliches Jahrbuch.

[31]  C. E. SHANNON,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[32]  G. Kerr.  The use of silvicultural systems to enhance the biological diversity of plantation forests in Britain , 1999 .

[33]  W. L. Mason,et al.  Silvicultural possibilities for increasing structural diversity in British spruce forests: the case of Kielder Forest , 1995 .

[34]  E. H. Simpson.  Measurement of Diversity , 1949, Nature.

[35]  J. P. Kimmins.  Forest Ecology: A Foundation for Sustainable Management , 1996 .

[36]  Wolfram Gleichmar,et al.  Indizes zur Charakterisierung der horizontalen Baumverteilung , 1998, Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt vereinigt mit Tharandter forstliches Jahrbuch.

[37]  Timo Saksa,et al.  Stand structure as the basis of diversity index , 1999 .

[38]  Erkki Tomppo,et al.  Models and methods for analysing spatial patterns of trees. , 1986 .

[39]  Dietrich Stoyan,et al.  Marked Point Processes in Forest Statistics , 1992, Forest Science.

[40]  A. Ek,et al.  Plot Edge Bias in Forest Stand Growth Simulation Models , 1974 .