Hazop Study and Fault Tree Analysis for Calculation Safety Integrity Level on Reactor-C.5-01, Oil Refinery Unit at Balikpapan-Indonesia

plat former reactors are reactors that are in the plat forming unit is designed for developing your specific hydrocarbon molecules that are used in catalytic engine fuel in boiling point range naphtha and fuel mixture to produce components with a higher octane value. Plat former reactor system failure may disrupt operations in the oil processing refinery unit. These circumstances will cause the supply plaformat as products of the plat forming unit valued high octane which is the main raw material of gasoline blending system is reduced. Resulting in decreased production consequency large losses. The failure of the reactor system can also be harmful to the operator, the environment and there is a possibility of reactor unit may explode. To avoid these risks we conducted studies identify hazards that occur in the process rector Hazard and operability (HAZOP) analysis and calculate the value of safety integrity level (SIL). In this study reviewed three nodes Overview consisting of node stage 1, stage 2 and stage 3. Based on the results of identification are thirteen instruments on the third node, which includes equipment; PC-193, FI-005, PC-194 and FI-010. Standards-based Service Oriented systems have Unacceptable risk criteria and the criteria of likelihood 4 Consequences worth three. As for the evaluation of SIL is known that C-5-01 reactor system has two safety Integrity Function (SIS) located in the path of fuel gas and pilot gas lines of the reactor heater. Both SIS has a vote = 1oo3 architecture with similar characteristics, and a review of the SIS has a security level SIL = 2 with a value of PFD = 0.00103.

[1]  Thongchai Srinophakun,et al.  Integration of safety instrumented system with automated HAZOP analysis: An application for continuous biodiesel production , 2011 .

[2]  Ali Musyafa,et al.  Reliability Assessment of Cooling Pump For Parts Inventory Planning in Power Plant System, Paiton-Indonesia , 2014 .

[3]  Charles E Ebeling,et al.  An Introduction to Reliability and Maintainability Engineering , 1996 .

[4]  Heri Justiono,et al.  Evaluation of the Reliability and Prediction Maintenance on the Air Compressor System in Ammonia Plant PT. Petrokimia Gresik , 2015 .

[5]  Ali Musyafa,et al.  Hazad And Operability Study and Analysis of Safety Integrity Level Case Study: Ammonia Refrigerant Compressor at Petrocemical Plant , 2015 .

[6]  Robert W. Johnson Beyond-compliance uses of HAZOP/LOPA studies , 2010 .

[7]  Balbir S. Dhillon,et al.  Reliability, Quality, and Safety for Engineers , 2004 .

[8]  Totok R. Biyanto,et al.  Evaluation Safety Integrity Level Using Layer of Protection Analysis in Recycle Gas First Stage Cycle Compressor at PT.Pertamina Persero , 2015 .

[9]  Bin Hu,et al.  Quantitative assessment of probability of failing safely for the safety instrumented system using reliability block diagram method , 2015 .

[10]  Ronny D. Noriyati,et al.  Reliability and Maintainability Assessment of the Steam Turbine Instrumentation System for optimization Operational Availability System at Fertilizer Plant , 2014 .

[11]  Ernesto Salzano,et al.  Blast Damage Consideratons for Horizontal Pressure Vessel and Potential for Domino Effects , 2012 .

[12]  Farhad Nabhani,et al.  Accidents in Pressure Vessels: Hazard Awareness , 2010 .

[13]  A. J. Adham Ali,et al.  Reliability Of Risk Assessment In Petrochemical Industries , 2015 .

[14]  Lana Skrtic Hydrogen Sulfide , Oil and Gas , and People ’ s Health , 2006 .

[15]  William H. Woodall,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, Fifth Edition , 2005 .

[16]  Stanley S. Grossel Guidelines for Evaluating Process Plant Buildings for External Explosions, Fires, and Toxic Releases, 2nd Edition (2012) By CCPS, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, NJ, 232 pages, $115.00, ISBN; 978-0-470-64367 , 2013 .

[17]  Lyn E. Fletcher Potential Explosive Hazards from Hydrogen Sulfide Production in Ship Ballast and Sewage Tanks. , 1998 .