Dominant role of local dipolar interactions in phosphate binding to a receptor cleft with an electronegative charge surface: Equilibrium, kinetic, and crystallographic studies

Stringent specificity and complementarity between the receptor, a periplasmic phosphate‐binding protein (PBP) with a two‐domain structure, and the completely buried and dehydrated phosphate are achieved by hydrogen bonding or dipolar interactions. We recently found that the surface charge potential of the cleft between the two domains that contains the anion binding site is intensely electronegative. This novel finding prompted the study reported here of the effect of ionic strength on the equilibrium and rapid kinetics of phosphate binding. To facilitate this study, Alal97, located on the edge of the cleft, was replaced by a Trp residue (A197W PBP) to generate a fluorescence reporter group. The A197W PBP‐phosphate complex retains wild‐type Kd and X‐ray structure beyond the replacement residue. The Kd (0.18 μM) at no salt is increased by 20‐fold at greater than 0.30 M NaCl. Stopped‐flow fluorescence kinetic studies indicate a two‐step binding process: (1) The phosphate (L) binds, at near diffusion‐controlled rate, to the open cleft form (Po) of PBP to produce an intermediate, PoL. This rate decreases with increasing ionic strength. (2) The intermediate isomerizes to the closed‐conformation form, PcL. The results indicate that the high specificity, affinity, and rate of phosphate binding are not influenced by the noncomplementary electronegative surface potential of the cleft. That binding depends almost entirely on local dipolar interactions with the receptor has important ramification in electrostatic interactions in protein structures and in ligand recognition.

[1]  F. Quiocho,et al.  Crystallization and x-ray diffraction studies of a phosphate-binding protein involved in active transport in Escherichia coli. , 1986, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  F. Quiocho,et al.  Dominant role of local dipoles in stabilizing uncompensated charges on a sulfate sequestered in a periplasmic active transport protein , 1993, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[3]  H. Rosenberg,et al.  The phosphate-binding protein of Escherichia coli , 1970 .

[4]  F A Quiocho,et al.  Rates of ligand binding to periplasmic proteins involved in bacterial transport and chemotaxis. , 1983, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[5]  J. Corrie,et al.  Direct, real-time measurement of rapid inorganic phosphate release using a novel fluorescent probe and its application to actomyosin subfragment 1 ATPase. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[6]  F. Quiocho,et al.  Fine tuning the specificity of the periplasmic phosphate transport receptor. Site-directed mutagenesis, ligand binding, and crystallographic studies. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[7]  F. Quiocho,et al.  Negative electrostatic surface potential of protein sites specific for anionic ligands. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  S. Kim,et al.  Crystal structure of the lysine-, arginine-, ornithine-binding protein (LAO) from Salmonella typhimurium at 2.7-A resolution. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[9]  F. Quiocho,et al.  Atomic structure and specificity of bacterial periplasmic receptors for active transport and chemotaxis: variation of common themes , 1996, Molecular microbiology.

[10]  F. Quiocho,et al.  Sulphate sequestered in the sulphate-binding protein of Salmonella typhimurium is bound solely by hydrogen bonds , 1985, Nature.

[11]  J. Shaw,et al.  The mechanism of ligand binding to the periplasmic C4-dicarboxylate binding protein (DctP) from Rhodobacter capsulatus. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[12]  F. Quiocho,et al.  2 A resolution structure of DppA, a periplasmic dipeptide transport/chemosensory receptor. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[13]  F. Quiocho,et al.  Modulation of a salt link does not affect binding of phosphate to its specific active transport receptor. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[14]  T L Rosenberry,et al.  Effective charge on acetylcholinesterase active sites determined from the ionic strength dependence of association rate constants with cationic ligands. , 1980, Biochemistry.

[15]  Z. Otwinowski,et al.  [20] Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[16]  G L Gilliland,et al.  The 2.8-A resolution structure of the L-arabinose-binding protein from Escherichia coli. Polypeptide chain folding, domain similarity, and probable location of sugar-binding site. , 1977, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[17]  F. Quiocho,et al.  Refined 1.89-A structure of the histidine-binding protein complexed with histidine and its relationship with many other active transport/chemosensory proteins. , 1994, Biochemistry.

[18]  F. Quiocho,et al.  High specificity of a phosphate transport protein determined by hydrogen bonds , 1990, Nature.

[19]  F. Quiocho,et al.  Interdomain salt bridges modulate ligand-induced domain motion of the sulfate receptor protein for active transport. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  F. Quiocho,et al.  Periplasmic binding protein structure and function. Refined X-ray structures of the leucine/isoleucine/valine-binding protein and its complex with leucine. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  H Luecke,et al.  Dipoles localized at helix termini of proteins stabilize charges. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  Axel T. Brunger,et al.  X-PLOR Version 3.1: A System for X-ray Crystallography and NMR , 1992 .

[23]  A. Pardee Purification and properties of a sulfate-binding protein from Salmonella typhimurium. , 1966, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[24]  R. Huber,et al.  Accurate Bond and Angle Parameters for X-ray Protein Structure Refinement , 1991 .

[25]  F. Quiocho,et al.  A low energy short hydrogen bond in very high resolution structures of protein receptor-phosphate complexes , 1997, Nature Structural Biology.

[26]  F A Quiocho,et al.  The mechanism of sugar binding to the periplasmic receptor for galactose chemotaxis and transport in Escherichia coli. , 1980, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[27]  J S Sack,et al.  CHAIN: a crystallographic modeling program. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[28]  J. Falke,et al.  Large amplitude twisting motions of an interdomain hinge: a disulfide trapping study of the galactose-glucose binding protein. , 1995, Biochemistry.

[29]  Florante A. Quiocho,et al.  Stabilization of charges on isolated ionic groups sequestered in proteins by polarized peptide units , 1987, Nature.

[30]  F A Quiocho,et al.  A Pro to Gly mutation in the hinge of the arabinose-binding protein enhances binding and alters specificity. Sugar-binding and crystallographic studies. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[31]  F. Quiocho Atomic structures and function of periplasmic receptors for active transport and chemotaxis , 1991 .

[32]  J. Emsley,et al.  Hydrogen Bonding and Chemical Reactivity , 1991 .

[33]  W. Cleland,et al.  Low-barrier hydrogen bonds and enzymic catalysis. , 1994, Science.