Degeneracy: a link between evolvability, robustness and complexity in biological systems

A full accounting of biological robustness remains elusive; both in terms of the mechanisms by which robustness is achieved and the forces that have caused robustness to grow over evolutionary time. Although its importance to topics such as ecosystem services and resilience is well recognized, the broader relationship between robustness and evolution is only starting to be fully appreciated. A renewed interest in this relationship has been prompted by evidence that mutational robustness can play a positive role in the discovery of adaptive innovations (evolvability) and evidence of an intimate relationship between robustness and complexity in biology.This paper offers a new perspective on the mechanics of evolution and the origins of complexity, robustness, and evolvability. Here we explore the hypothesis that degeneracy, a partial overlap in the functioning of multi-functional components, plays a central role in the evolution and robustness of complex forms. In support of this hypothesis, we present evidence that degeneracy is a fundamental source of robustness, it is intimately tied to multi-scaled complexity, and it establishes conditions that are necessary for system evolvability.

[1]  Dr. Susumu Ohno.  Evolution by Gene Duplication , 1970, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[2]  U. Sauer,et al.  The Soluble and Membrane-bound Transhydrogenases UdhA and PntAB Have Divergent Functions in NADPH Metabolism of Escherichia coli* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  A. Wagner,et al.  The role of population size, pleiotropy and fitness effects of mutations in the evolution of overlapping gene functions. , 2000, Genetics.

[4]  A. Wagner.  Robustness and evolvability: a paradox resolved , 2008, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  R. Tanaka,et al.  Scale-rich metabolic networks. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[6]  Olof Görnerup,et al.  Objects that make objects: the population dynamics of structural complexity , 2004, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[7]  A. Wagner,et al.  Innovation and robustness in complex regulatory gene networks , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[8]  W. Fontana,et al.  Plasticity, evolvability, and modularity in RNA. , 2000, The Journal of experimental zoology.

[9]  S. Newman,et al.  Generic physical mechanisms of tissue morphogenesis: A common basis for development and evolution , 1994 .

[10]  Evandro Agazzi,et al.  What is Complexity , 2002 .

[11]  Christoph Adami,et al.  Sequence complexity in Darwinian evolution , 2002, Complex..

[12]  C. Markert,et al.  Evolution of the Gene , 1948, Nature.

[13]  Lan V. Zhang,et al.  Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein–protein interaction network , 2004, Nature.

[14]  T. Kitami,et al.  Biochemical networking contributes more to genetic buffering in human and mouse metabolic pathways than does gene duplication , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[15]  W. Banzhaf,et al.  Genetic programming using genotype-phenotype mapping from linear genomes into linear phenotypes , 1996 .

[16]  Sanyou Zeng,et al.  Evolvable Systems: From Biology to Hardware, 7th International Conference, ICES 2007, Wuhan, China, September 21-23, 2007, Proceedings , 2007, ICES.

[17]  Risto Miikkulainen,et al.  Towards an empirical measure of evolvability , 2005, GECCO '05.

[18]  G Tononi,et al.  Measures of degeneracy and redundancy in biological networks. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Anil K. Seth,et al.  Consciousness and Complexity , 2022 .

[20]  D. Bendall,et al.  Evolution from molecules to men , 1984 .

[21]  Julian Francis Miller,et al.  The Advantages of Landscape Neutrality in Digital Circuit Evolution , 2000, ICES.

[22]  A. Wagner,et al.  Evolution of gene networks by gene duplications: a mathematical model and its implications on genome organization. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  C. S. Holling,et al.  Resilience, Adaptability and Transformability in Social–ecological Systems , 2004 .

[24]  A. Force,et al.  Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. , 1999, Genetics.

[25]  J. Stelling,et al.  Robustness of Cellular Functions , 2004, Cell.

[26]  Axel Bender,et al.  Degeneracy: a design principle for achieving robustness and evolvability. , 2009, Journal of theoretical biology.

[27]  Murray Gell-Mann,et al.  What is complexity? Remarks on simplicity and complexity by the Nobel Prize-winning author of The Quark and the Jaguar , 1995, Complex..

[28]  L. Hood,et al.  Reverse Engineering of Biological Complexity , 2007 .

[29]  M. Huynen,et al.  Smoothness within ruggedness: the role of neutrality in adaptation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  H. Kitano.  A robustness-based approach to systems-oriented drug design , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[31]  Franz Rothlauf,et al.  Redundant Representations in Evolutionary Computation , 2003, Evolutionary Computation.

[32]  James M. Whitacre,et al.  Degenerate Neutrality Creates Evolvable Fitness Landscapes , 2009, GEM.

[33]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[34]  Julian Francis Miller,et al.  Neutrality and the Evolvability of Boolean Function Landscape , 2001, EuroGP.

[35]  G. Fink,et al.  A Saccharomyces gene family involved in invasive growth, cell-cell adhesion, and mating. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  E. Berlow,et al.  Strong effects of weak interactions in ecological communities , 1999, Nature.

[37]  N. Pierce.  Origin of Species , 1914, Nature.

[38]  Matthew C. Cowperthwaite,et al.  From Bad to Good: Fitness Reversals and the Ascent of Deleterious Mutations , 2006, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[39]  John Doyle,et al.  Complexity and robustness , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  L. Altenberg,et al.  PERSPECTIVE: COMPLEX ADAPTATIONS AND THE EVOLUTION OF EVOLVABILITY , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[41]  C. S. Holling.  Understanding the Complexity of Economic, Ecological, and Social Systems , 2001, Ecosystems.

[42]  An-Ping Zeng,et al.  The Connectivity Structure, Giant Strong Component and Centrality of Metabolic Networks , 2003, Bioinform..

[43]  A. Wagner.  Distributed robustness versus redundancy as causes of mutational robustness. , 2005, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[44]  D. Hull.  Universal Darwinism , 1995, Nature.

[45]  C. Wilke,et al.  Compensatory mutations cause excess of antagonistic epistasis in RNA secondary structure folding , 2003, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[46]  Günter P. Wagner,et al.  Complex Adaptations and the Evolution of Evolvability , 2005 .

[47]  J. Crutchfield,et al.  The Evolutionary Unfolding of Complexity , 1999, adap-org/9903001.

[48]  D. McShea.  PERSPECTIVE METAZOAN COMPLEXITY AND EVOLUTION: IS THERE A TREND? , 1996, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[49]  J. Anderies,et al.  From Metaphor to Measurement: Resilience of What to What? , 2001, Ecosystems.

[50]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Neutralism and selectionism: a network-based reconciliation , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[51]  G. Wagner,et al.  EVOLUTION AND DETECTION OF GENETIC ROBUSTNESS , 2003 .

[52]  D. Wake.  Homoplasy: The Result of Natural Selection, or Evidence of Design Limitations? , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[53]  Bruce Edmonds,et al.  Complexity and Scientific Modelling , 2000 .

[54]  Hiroaki Kitano,et al.  Biological robustness , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[55]  K. H. Wolfe,et al.  Molecular evidence for an ancient duplication of the entire yeast genome , 1997, Nature.

[56]  Richard A. Watson,et al.  On the Utility of Redundant Encodings in Mutation-Based Evolutionary Search , 2002, PPSN.

[57]  Wolfgang Banzhaf,et al.  Genotype-Phenotype-Mapping and Neutral Variation - A Case Study in Genetic Programming , 1994, PPSN.

[58]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Robustness and evolvability in genetic regulatory networks. , 2007, Journal of theoretical biology.

[59]  P. Willmer,et al.  CONVERGENT EVOLUTION IN INVERTEBRATES , 1997, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[60]  J M Carlson,et al.  Highly optimized tolerance: a mechanism for power laws in designed systems. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[61]  Leslie G. Valiant,et al.  Evolvability , 2009, JACM.

[62]  G. Edelman,et al.  Degeneracy and complexity in biological systems , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[63]  Patrick L. Griffin,et al.  Functional information and the emergence of biocomplexity , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[64]  C. Moore,et al.  Automatic filters for the detection of coherent structure in spatiotemporal systems. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[65]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Convergent evolution of gene circuits , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[66]  T. Smith,et al.  Neutrality and ruggedness in robot landscapes , 2002, Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC'02 (Cat. No.02TH8600).

[67]  Péter Csermely,et al.  Weak links : stabilizers of complex systems from proteins to social networks , 2006 .