Harvest index stability of Argentinean maize hybrids released between 1965 and 1993

Abstract Harvest index (HI) and its stability are key determinants of crop yield. HI of Argentinean maize hybrids released at different decades was compared using as a framework the relationship between yield and final shoot biomass on a per plant basis ( Y P and S P , respectively). The objectives of this work were (i) to determine differences among hybrids in the parameters of the Y P – S P relationship and in HI stability and (ii) to explain these differences by studying the response of yield components (i.e. kernel number per ear and weight per kernel) to resource availability. Two experiments were carried out at Balcarce, Argentina (37°45′S, 58°18′W; elevation 130 m) during two growing seasons, 1998–1999 and 1999–2000. A wide range of Y P and S P was generated by manipulation of plant density. Shoot dry matter per plant, grain yield per plant and its components were measured at physiological maturity. Hybrids differed in their Y P response to resource per plant availability and in HI stability. The greater HI stability of non-prolific plants of modern hybrids was associated with lower biomass thresholds for yield at low S P and with greater reproductive plasticity at high S P . Prolificacy contributed to HI stability in all hybrids to a similar extent. All yield components contributed to explain yield and HI responses to variation in S P . At low S P , Y P increments were mainly related to KN P increments. At intermediate S P , increases in Y P were related to both yield components to a similar extent. However, a plateau for KW was found in the two oldest hybrids. At large S P , Y P response to S P was related to prolificacy.

[1]  J. Doebley,et al.  The evolution of apical dominance in maize , 1997, Nature.

[2]  R. Jones,et al.  Thermal Environment During Endosperm Cell Division in Maize: Effects on Number of Endosperm Cells and Starch Granules 1 , 1985 .

[3]  T. B. Daynard,et al.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FINAL YIELD AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS AT FLOWERING IN INDIVIDUAL MAIZE PLANTS , 1979 .

[4]  R. M. Castleberry,et al.  Genetic Yield Improvement of U.S. Maize Cultivars under Varying Fertility and Climatic Environments1 , 1984 .

[5]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Physiological Basis of the Genetic Improvement of Corn , 1994 .

[6]  V. A. Fasoula,et al.  Principles underlying genetic improvement for high and stable crop yield potential , 2002 .

[7]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Yield Improvement in Temperate Maize is Attributable to Greater Stress Tolerance , 1999 .

[8]  V. Sadras,et al.  Reproductive Allometry in Soybean, Maize and Sunflower , 2000 .

[9]  Mark E. Westgate,et al.  Synchronous pollination within and between ears improves kernel set in maize , 2000 .

[10]  J. Hanway.  How a corn plant develops , 1966 .

[11]  M. Tollenaar,et al.  Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize , 2002 .

[12]  W. Russell,et al.  Yield Performance of Nonprolific and Prolific Maize Hybrids at Six Plant Densities 1 , 1975 .

[13]  M. Tollenaar.  Physiological Basis of Genetic Improvement of Maize Hybrids in Ontario from 1959 to 1988 , 1991 .

[14]  J. Ritchie,et al.  Shade-sensitive interval of kernel number of maize , 1985 .

[15]  V. Sadras,et al.  Reproductive partitioning and seed set efficiency in soybean, sunflower and maize , 2001 .

[16]  D. W. Stewart,et al.  Ear and Kernel Formation in Maize Hybrids Representing Three Decades of Grain Yield Improvement in Ontario , 1992 .

[17]  M. Cantarero,et al.  Kernel Number Determination in Maize , 1999 .

[18]  K. Fischer,et al.  The effect of changes of assimilate supply around flowering on grain sink size and yield of maize (Zea mays L.) cultivars of tropical and temperate adaptation , 1988 .

[19]  G. Edmeades,et al.  Causes for Silk Delay in a Lowland Tropical Maize Population , 1993 .

[20]  M. E. Otegui.  Prolificacy and grain yield components in modern Argentinian maize hybrids , 1995 .

[21]  A. F. Troyer,et al.  Utility of Higher Plant Densities for Corn Performance Testing , 1983 .

[22]  M. Bänziger,et al.  Developing drought- and low N-tolerant maize , 1997 .

[23]  Victor O. Sadras,et al.  Response of maize kernel number to plant density in Argentinean hybrids released between 1965 and 1993 , 2000 .

[24]  R. C. Muchow,et al.  Relative sensitivity of grain yield and biomass accumulation to drought in field-grown maize , 1990 .

[25]  T. B. Daynard,et al.  Relationship between Assimilate Source and Reproductive Sink in Maize Grown in a Short-Season Environment1 , 1978 .