Interactivity 3 Design and Assessment Framework for Educational Games to Promote Motivation and Complex Problem-Solving Skills

Complex problem solving and motivation are often argued as the most important benefits of massively multiplayer role-playing online games. However, little empirical research exists to support these assertions. Current research and educational game design theory are insufficient to explain the relationship between complex problem solving, motivation, and games; nor do they support the design of educational games intended to promote motivation and complex problem-solving skills. For the past few years, we have been engaged with design-based research (DBR) to address this gap in the literature. In this chapter, we present the findings of this study in a framework for designing and assessing educational MMORPGs for facilitating learners’ motivation and complex problem-solving skill acquisition. This game design and assessment framework bridges three levels of interactivity that were identified in a series of DBR studies as being crucial for effective educational game design: (1) interface interactivity, (2) narrative interactivity, and (3) social interactivity. In this chapter, we present Interactivity3 design and assessment framework and discuss the findings of a study that shows the validity of this framework for designing and assessing educational MMORPGs.

[1]  Marc Prensky,et al.  Don't bother me, Mom, I'm learning! , 2006 .

[2]  Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.  Seriously considering play: Designing interactive learning environments based on the blending of microworlds, simulations, and games , 1996 .

[3]  Kara L. Orvis,et al.  Relationships Between Game Attributes and Learning Outcomes , 2009 .

[4]  Kinshuk,et al.  Multiple perspectives on problem solving and learning in the digital age , 2011 .

[5]  Timothy Koschmann,et al.  Cscl : Theory and Practice of An Emerging Paradigm , 1996 .

[6]  Chris Crawford Interactivity, Process, and Algorithm , 2010 .

[7]  Richard Van Eck,et al.  Gaming and Cognition: Theories and Practice from the Learning Sciences , 2010 .

[8]  Andrea Gregg,et al.  Learning From Doing: Lessons Learned From Designing and Developing an Educational Software Within a Heterogeneous Group , 2021, Int. J. Web Based Learn. Teach. Technol..

[9]  Robert J. Moore,et al.  The social side of gaming: a study of interaction patterns in a massively multiplayer online game , 2004, CSCW.

[10]  Colin Ware,et al.  Haptic-GeoZui3D: Exploring the Use of Haptics in AUV Path Planning , 2003 .

[11]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Dirk Ifenthaler,et al.  Relational, structural, and semantic analysis of graphical representations and concept maps , 2010 .

[13]  Dirk Ifenthaler,et al.  Automated Knowledge Visualization and Assessment , 2010 .

[14]  Richard N. Van Eck Six Ideas in Search of a Discipline , 2007 .

[15]  C. Campbell It's child's play. , 1982, Nursing mirror.

[16]  Scott N. Wilson,et al.  Serious Games for the Classroom : A Case Study of Designing and Developing a Massive Multiplayer Online Game , 2010 .

[17]  James D. Klein,et al.  The effect of computer-mediated collaborative learning on solving III-defined problems , 2003 .

[18]  M. Segers,et al.  Effects of problem-based learning: a meta- analysis , 2003 .

[19]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[20]  Marc Prensky,et al.  Digital game-based learning , 2000, CIE.

[21]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1990 .

[22]  Dietrich Doerner,et al.  On the Difficulties People Have in Dealing With Complexity , 1980 .

[23]  Tracy Fullerton,et al.  Game Design Workshop: Designing, Prototyping, and Playtesting Games , 2004 .

[24]  Glenda A. Gunter,et al.  Taking educational games seriously: using the RETAIN model to design endogenous fantasy into standalone educational games , 2008 .

[25]  David Gibson,et al.  Games And Simulations in Online Learning: Research and Development Frameworks , 2006 .

[26]  Chris Crawford,et al.  The Art of Computer Game Design , 1984 .

[27]  Christine Brown,et al.  Unpacking the potential of educational gaming: A new tool for gaming research , 2007 .

[28]  Fran C. Blumberg,et al.  Impasse-driven learning in the context of video games , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  Richard N. Van Eck Interdisciplinary Models and Tools for Serious Games: Emerging Concepts and Future Directions , 2010 .

[30]  Fotis Liarokapis,et al.  An exploration from virtual to augmented reality gaming , 2006 .

[31]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[32]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Instructional design models for well-structured and III-structured problem-solving learning outcomes , 1997 .

[33]  Lars Konzack,et al.  Computer Game Criticism: A Method for Computer Game Analysis , 2002, CGDC Conf..

[34]  Thomas W. Malone,et al.  What Makes Things Fun to Learn? A Study of Intrinsically Motivating Computer Games. , 1981 .

[35]  James Paul Gee,et al.  Good Video Games + Good Learning: collected essays on video games, learning and literacy , 2013 .

[36]  Peta Wyeth,et al.  GameFlow: a model for evaluating player enjoyment in games , 2005, CIE.

[37]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, 3rd Edition , 2012 .

[38]  Sasha A. Barab,et al.  A co-evolutionary model for supporting the emergence of authenticity , 2000 .

[39]  Michele D. Dickey Game design and learning: a conjectural analysis of how massively multiple online role-playing games (MMORPGs) foster intrinsic motivation , 2007 .

[40]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[41]  Bryan G. Behrenshausen,et al.  Serious Games for Transformative Learning : A Communication Perspective on the Radical Binarisation of Everyday Life , 2010 .

[42]  Nick Yee,et al.  Motivations for Play in Online Games , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[43]  Charles M. Reigeluth,et al.  Instructional-design Theories and Models : A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, Volume II , 1999 .

[44]  Alan Amory,et al.  Game object model version II: a theoretical framework for educational game development , 2007 .

[45]  James Paul Gee,et al.  What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy , 2007, CIE.

[46]  J. Gee,et al.  How Computer Games Help Children Learn , 2006 .

[47]  Daniel C. Moos,et al.  Can Students Collaboratively Use Hypermedia to Learn Science? The Dynamics of Self-and other-Regulatory Processes in an Ecology Classroom , 2004 .

[48]  D. Norman,et al.  New technology and human error , 1989 .

[49]  Constance Steinkuehler,et al.  Learning in Massively Multiplayer Online Games , 2004, ICLS.

[50]  Brian C. Nelson,et al.  Managing cognitive load in educational multi-user virtual environments: reflection on design practice , 2008 .

[51]  Dirk Ifenthaler,et al.  Dynamic Modeling as a Cognitive Regulation Scaffold for Developing Complex Problem-Solving Skills in an Educational Massively Multiplayer Online Game Environment , 2011 .

[52]  Mark R. Lepper,et al.  Effects of fantasy contexts on children's learning and motivation: making learning more fun. , 1992 .

[53]  M. Lepper,et al.  Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice. , 1996 .

[54]  Joost Raessens,et al.  Handbook of Computer Game Studies , 2005 .

[55]  Dirk Ifenthaler,et al.  Computer-Based Diagnostics and Systematic Analysis of Knowledge , 2010 .

[56]  Xun Ge,et al.  Technology-Rich Ethnography for Examining the Transition to Authentic Problem-Solving in a High School Computer Programming Class , 2006 .

[57]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage , 1998 .

[58]  John V. Dempsey,et al.  Forty Simple Computer Games and What They Could Mean to Educators , 2002 .