Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex

Event-related potential (ERP) studies of the human brain have shown that object categories can be reliably distinguished as early as 130-170 ms on the surface of occipito-temporal cortex, peaking at the level of the N170 component. Consistent with this finding, neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies suggest major functional distinctions within the human object recognition system, particularly in hemispheric advantage, between the processing of words (left), faces (right), and objects (bilateral). Given these observations, our aim was to (1) characterize the differential response properties of the N170 to pictures of faces, objects, and words across hemispheres; and (2) test whether an effect of inversion for highly familiar and monooriented nonface stimuli such as printed words can be observed at the level of the N170. Scalp EEG (53 channels) was recorded in 15 subjects performing an orientation decision task with pictures of faces, words, and cars presented upright or inverted. All three categories elicited at the same latency a robust N170 component associated with a positive counterpart at centro-frontal sites (vertex-positive potential, VPP). While there were minor amplitude differences at the level of the occipital medial P1 between linguistic and nonlinguistic categories, scalp topographies and source analyses indicated strong hemispheric and orientation effects starting at the level of the N170, which was right lateralized for faces, smaller and bilateral for cars, and as large for printed words in the left hemisphere as for faces. The entire N170/VPP complex was accounted for by two dipolar sources located in the lateral inferior occipital cortex/posterior fusiform gyrus. These two locations were roughly equivalent across conditions but differed in strength and lateralization. Inversion delayed the N170 (and VPP) response for all categories, with an increasing delay for cars, words, and faces, respectively, as suggested by source modeling analysis. Such results show that early processes in object recognition respond to category-specific visual information, and are associated with strong lateralization and orientation bias.

[1]  M J Tarr,et al.  What Object Attributes Determine Canonical Views? , 1999, Perception.

[2]  M. Kutas,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence for visual perceptual categorization of words and faces within 150 ms. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[3]  A. Burton,et al.  Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[4]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Cognitive Neuroscience: Tracking the time course of object categorization using event-related potentials , 1999 .

[5]  M. Tarr,et al.  Expertise Training with Novel Objects Leads to Left-Lateralized Facelike Electrophysiological Responses , 2002, Psychological science.

[6]  Florence Thibaut,et al.  ERPs ASSOCIATED WITH FAMILIARITY AND DEGREE OF FAMILIARITY DURING FACE RECOGNITION , 2002, The International journal of neuroscience.

[7]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Spatial scale contribution to early visual differences between face and object processing. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[8]  T. Allison,et al.  Face recognition in human extrastriate cortex. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Cognitive Neuropsychology: Patterns of Co-occurrence Among the Associative Agnosias: Implications for Visual Object Representation , 1991 .

[10]  G. V. Van Hoesen,et al.  Prosopagnosia , 1982, Neurology.

[11]  S. Morand,et al.  Electric source imaging of human brain functions , 2001, Brain Research Reviews.

[12]  S Dehaene,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for category-specific word processing in the normal human brain. , 1995, Neuroreport.

[13]  I. Gauthier,et al.  Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  J. Tanaka,et al.  An electrophysiological comparison of visual categorization and recognition memory , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[15]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Visual Object Agnosia without Alexia or Prosopagnosia: Arguments for Separate Knowledge Stores , 1997 .

[16]  T. Allison,et al.  Word recognition in the human inferior temporal lobe , 1994, Nature.

[17]  A. Puce,et al.  The spatiotemporal dynamics of the face inversion effect: A magneto- and electro-encephalographic study , 2003, Neuroscience.

[18]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The selectivity of the occipitotemporal M170 for faces , 2000, Neuroreport.

[19]  J. Davidoff,et al.  Brain events related to normal and moderately scrambled faces. , 1996, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[20]  E. Halgren,et al.  Cognitive response profile of the human fusiform face area as determined by MEG. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  P. Jolicoeur,et al.  Orientation congruency effects on the identification of disoriented shapes. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  J. Tanaka,et al.  A Neural Basis for Expert Object Recognition , 2001, Psychological science.

[23]  B. Rossion,et al.  Task modulation of brain activity related to familiar and unfamiliar face processing: an ERP study , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[24]  Joachim Bodamer,et al.  Die Prosop-Agnosie , 2004, Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten.

[25]  P. O. Bishop,et al.  Spatial vision. , 1971, Annual review of psychology.

[26]  V. Goffaux,et al.  Spatio-temporal localization of the face inversion effect: an event-related potentials study , 1999, Biological Psychology.

[27]  I. Gauthier,et al.  A defense of the subordinate-level expertise account for the N170 component , 2002, Cognition.

[28]  M. Eimer ATTENTIONAL MODULATIONS OF EVENT-RELATED BRAIN POTENTIALS SENSITIVE TO FACES , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[29]  N. Sagiv,et al.  Structural Encoding of Human and Schematic Faces: Holistic and Part-Based Processes , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  M. Farah,et al.  Neural Specialization for Letter Recognition , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[31]  K. Bötzel,et al.  Scalp topography and analysis of intracranial sources of face-evoked potentials , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[32]  R. Yin Looking at Upside-down Faces , 1969 .

[33]  T. Allison,et al.  Differential Sensitivity of Human Visual Cortex to Faces, Letterstrings, and Textures: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  D. Jeffreys Evoked Potential Studies of Face and Object Processing , 1996 .

[35]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  Specialization within visual object recognition: Clues from prosopagnosia and alexia. , 1994 .

[36]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[37]  O Bertrand,et al.  A theoretical justification of the average reference in topographic evoked potential studies. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[38]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: Event-related potentials during picture and word categorization , 2001, Memory & cognition.

[39]  G. Winocur,et al.  What Is Special about Face Recognition? Nineteen Experiments on a Person with Visual Object Agnosia and Dyslexia but Normal Face Recognition , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[41]  W. Chase,et al.  Visual information processing. , 1974 .

[42]  M. Eimer Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces. Evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[43]  J. Pernier,et al.  ERP Manifestations of Processing Printed Words at Different Psycholinguistic Levels: Time Course and Scalp Distribution , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[46]  W. Krieg Functional Neuroanatomy , 1953, Springer Series in Experimental Entomology.

[47]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  M Eimer,et al.  Does the face‐specific N170 component reflect the activity of a specialized eye processor? , 1998, Neuroreport.

[49]  M. Tarr,et al.  The N170 occipito‐temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: an electrophysiological account of face‐specific processes in the human brain , 2000, Neuroreport.

[50]  S. Thorpe,et al.  The Time Course of Visual Processing: From Early Perception to Decision-Making , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  I. Gauthier,et al.  How does the brain process upright and inverted faces? , 2002, Behavioral and cognitive neuroscience reviews.

[52]  Olivier Pascalis,et al.  Specialization of Neural Mechanisms Underlying Face Recognition in Human Infants , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  D. Jeffreys A face-responsive potential recorded from the human scalp , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[54]  D. Jeffreys,et al.  The influence of stimulus orientation on the vertex positive scalp potential evoked by faces , 1993, Experimental Brain Research.

[55]  T Landis,et al.  Prosopagnosia and agnosia for noncanonical views. An autopsied case. , 1988, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[56]  M. Tarr,et al.  FFA: a flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[57]  L. Fagan-Dubin,et al.  Lateral dominance and development of cerebral specialization. , 1974 .

[58]  M. Crommelinck,et al.  Is the N170 for faces cognitively penetrable? Evidence from repetition priming of Mooney faces of familiar and unfamiliar persons. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[59]  Martha J. Farah,et al.  The Neuropsychology of High-Level Vision , 1994 .

[60]  C Van Petten,et al.  Electrophysiological perspectives on comprehending written language. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[61]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  ERP evidence for task modulations on face perceptual processing at different spatial scales , 2003, Cogn. Sci..

[62]  M. Scherg Fundamentals if dipole source potential analysis , 1990 .

[63]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Eyes first! Eye processing develops before face processing in children , 2001, Neuroreport.

[64]  C. Bernard,et al.  Event-Related Potentials for Category-Specific Information During Passive Viewing of Faces and Objects , 2001, The International journal of neuroscience.

[65]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Is the face‐sensitive N170 the only ERP not affected by selective attention? , 2000, Neuroreport.

[66]  M. Eimer,et al.  The processing of emotional facial expression is gated by spatial attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[67]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  ERP evidence of developmental changes in processing of faces , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[68]  K. Linkenkaer-Hansen,et al.  Face-selective processing in human extrastriate cortex around 120 ms after stimulus onset revealed by magneto- and electroencephalography , 1998, Neuroscience Letters.

[69]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Inversion and Contrast Polarity Reversal Affect both Encoding and Recognition Processes of Unfamiliar Faces: A Repetition Study Using ERPs , 2002, NeuroImage.

[70]  S Braeutigam,et al.  Task-dependent early latency (30–60 ms) visual processing of human faces and other objects , 2001, Neuroreport.

[71]  M. Tovée,et al.  Face processing: Getting by with a little help from its friends , 1998, Current Biology.

[72]  D. Regan Human brain electrophysiology: Evoked potentials and evoked magnetic fields in science and medicine , 1989 .

[73]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Eccentricity Bias as an Organizing Principle for Human High-Order Object Areas , 2002, Neuron.

[74]  Margot J. Taylor Non-spatial attentional effects on P1 , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[75]  Mark H. Johnson,et al.  Modulation of event‐related potentials by prototypical and atypical faces , 2000, Neuroreport.

[76]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[77]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Language-Related ERPs: Scalp Distributions and Modulation by Word Type and Semantic Priming , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[78]  Terry M. Peters,et al.  3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes , 1993, 1993 IEEE Conference Record Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[79]  R. Shepard,et al.  CHRONOMETRIC STUDIES OF THE ROTATION OF MENTAL IMAGES , 1973 .

[80]  E. Vogel,et al.  The visual N1 component as an index of a discrimination process. , 2000, Psychophysiology.