Fire and land management planning and implementation across multiple scales

This paper was presented at the conference ‘Integrating spatial technologies and ecological principles for a new age in fire management’, Boise, Idaho, USA, June 1999 Ecosystem conditions on Federal public lands have changed, particularly within the last 30 years. Wildfires in the west have increased to levels close to or above those estimated for historical conditions, despite increasing efforts and expertise in fire prevention and suppression capability. To reverse these trends, planning for fire and land management policies, budgets, and restoration must address multiple decision levels (national, regional, local, and project) and incorporate an improved understanding of conditions and their linkage across these scales. Three fundamental issues are identified and discussed that relate to traditional types of planning and the associated lack of achievement of multi-scale integrated resource and fire objectives. Various examples of planning that address these three fundamental issues at different scales are compared to traditional types of planning. Outcomes predicted for an example national scale landscape dynamics model are used to illustrate the differences between three different multi-scale management scenarios.

[1]  R. Neil Sampson,et al.  Spatial data for national fire planning and fuel management , 2001 .

[2]  T. M. Quigley,et al.  Broad-scale consequences of land management: Columbia basin example , 2001 .

[3]  Miles A. Hemstrom,et al.  Trends in terrestrial plant communities and landscape health indicate the effects of alternative management strategies in the interior Columbia River basin , 2001 .

[4]  James T. Peterson,et al.  Evaluation of potential effects of federal land management alternatives on trends of salmonids and their habitats in the interior Columbia River basin , 2001 .

[5]  Rebecca A. Gravenmier,et al.  Science and ecosystem management in the interior Columbia basin. , 2001 .

[6]  Rebecca A. Gravenmier,et al.  Costs and effectiveness of multi-scale integrated management , 2001 .

[7]  Danny C. Lee,et al.  Toward an Integrated Classification of Ecosystems: Defining Opportunities for Managing Fish and Forest Health , 2000, Environmental management.

[8]  Frederick J. Swanson,et al.  OVERVIEW OF THE USE OF NATURAL VARIABILITY CONCEPTS IN MANAGING ECOLOGICAL SYSTEMS , 1999 .

[9]  P. Hessburg,et al.  DETECTING CHANGE IN FOREST SPATIAL PATTERNS FROM REFERENCE CONDITIONS , 1999 .

[10]  Julio L. Betancourt,et al.  APPLIED HISTORICAL ECOLOGY: USING THE PAST TO MANAGE FOR THE FUTURE , 1999 .

[11]  R. Schmid,et al.  Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds , 1999 .

[12]  Rebecca A. Gravenmier,et al.  ICBEMP: Using an Ecoregion Assessment for Integrated Policy Analysis , 1998, Journal of Forestry.

[13]  B. Marcot,et al.  ICBEMP: Terrestrial Species and Habitats , 1998, Journal of Forestry.

[14]  B. Rieman,et al.  ICBEMP: Aquatic Species and Habitats , 1998, Journal of Forestry.

[15]  Bill Leenhouts,et al.  Assessment of Biomass Burning in the Conterminous United States , 1998 .

[16]  Michael S. Knowles,et al.  Threatened and endangered species geography: characteristics of hot spots in the conterminous United States , 1998 .

[17]  David Ochmanek,et al.  Strategic Appraisal 1997: Strategy and Defense Planning for the 21st Century , 1997 .

[18]  S. Mackenzie Toward Integrated Resource Management: Lessons About the Ecosystem Approach from the Laurentian Great Lakes , 1997, Environmental management.

[19]  R. E. Grumbine,et al.  Reflections on “What is Ecosystem Management?” , 1997 .

[20]  James H. Brown,et al.  The Report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the Scientific Basis for Ecosystem Management , 1996 .

[21]  Paul F. Hessburg,et al.  Historical and current forest landscapes in Eastern Oregon and Washington. Part 2. linking vegetation characteristics to potential fire behavior and related smoke production , 1995 .

[22]  Robert W. Mutch,et al.  Fighting Fire with Prescribed Fire: A Return to Ecosystem Health , 1994, Journal of Forestry.

[23]  G. Aplet,et al.  Historical Range of Variability: A Useful Tool for Evaluating Ecosystem Change , 1994 .

[24]  Richard L. Everett,et al.  Historical and Anticipated Changes in Forest Ecosystems of the Inland West of the United States , 1994 .

[25]  D. Rosgen A classification of natural rivers , 1994 .

[26]  Robin J. Tausch,et al.  Viewpoint: Plant community thresholds, multiple steady states, and multiple successional pathways: legacy of the Quaternary? , 1993 .

[27]  T. Allen,et al.  Toward a Unified Ecology. , 1993 .

[28]  T. Seastedt,et al.  Quaternary Ecology: A Paleoecological Perspective , 1993 .

[29]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  Strategic Management , 1992 .

[30]  A. W. Küchler Potential Natural Vegetation of the Conterminous United States , 1965 .

[31]  Jerry Williams,et al.  Protecting People and Sustaining Resources in Fire-Adapted Ecosystems A Cohesive Strategy , 2000 .

[32]  R. Holthausen,et al.  Source habitats for terrestrial vertebrates of focus in the interior Columbia basin: broad-scale trends and management implications. Volume 3 - appendices. , 2000 .

[33]  R. Holthausen,et al.  Source habitats for terrestrial vertebrates of focus in the interior Columbia basin: broadscale trends and management implications. Volume 1—Overview. , 2000 .

[34]  Jacob Licht,et al.  Biology and Management of Noxious Rangeland Weeds , 1999 .

[35]  Craig A. Miller,et al.  Historical and current forest and range landscapes in the interior Columbia River basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins. Part 1: Linking vegetation patterns and landscape vulnerability to potential insect and pathogen disturbances. , 1999 .

[36]  Russell T. Graham,et al.  The effects of thinning and similar stand treatments on fire behavior in Western forests. , 1999 .

[37]  J. Agee The landscape ecology of western forest fire regimes , 1998 .

[38]  Thomas M. Quigley,et al.  An assessment of ecosystem components in the interior Columbia basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins: volume 1. , 1997 .

[39]  Robert E. Keane,et al.  First Order Fire Effects Model: FOFEM 4.0, user's guide , 1997 .

[40]  Danny C. Lee,et al.  Broadscale assessment of aquatic species and habitats [Chapter 4] , 1997 .

[41]  V. Saab,et al.  Large-scale conservation assessment for Neotropical migratory land birds in the interior Columbia River basin. , 1997 .

[42]  Dazhong Wen Land Mosaics: The Ecology of Landscapes and Regions , 1997 .

[43]  T. M. Quigley,et al.  A framework for ecosystem management in the interior Columbia Basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins , 1996 .

[44]  Richard W. Haynes,et al.  Integrated scientific assessment for ecosystem management in the interior Columbia Basin and portions of the Klamath and Great Basins. , 1996 .

[45]  R. Washington-Allen Rangeland Health: New Methods to Classify, Inventory, and Monitor Rangelands , 1995 .

[46]  Stephen W. Barrett,et al.  Comparing the Prescribed Natural Fire Program With Presettlement Fires in the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness , 1994 .

[47]  Larry S. Bradshaw,et al.  Comparisons of Particulate-Emissions and Smoke Impacts From Presettlement, Full Suppression, and Prescribed Natural Fire Period in the Selway-Bitterroot Wilderness , 1994 .

[48]  C. Flather,et al.  Species endangerment patterns in the United States , 1994 .

[49]  Arthur S. Lieberman,et al.  Landscape Ecology , 1994, Springer New York.

[50]  Board on Agriculture Rangeland Health: New Methods to Classify, Inventory, and Monitor Rangelands , 1994 .

[51]  F. Swanson,et al.  Natural Variability: Implications for Ecosystem Management , 1993 .

[52]  J. Agee Fire Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests , 1993 .

[53]  Anthony R White,et al.  Strategic management , 1986 .

[54]  W. C. Fischer,et al.  Predicting postfire plant succession for fire management planning. , 1980 .

[55]  Jacques Baudry,et al.  LANDSCAPE DYNAMICS , 2022 .