Predicting the future as Bayesian inference: people combine prior knowledge with observations when estimating duration and extent.

Predicting the future is a basic problem that people have to solve every day and a component of planning, decision making, memory, and causal reasoning. In this article, we present 5 experiments testing a Bayesian model of predicting the duration or extent of phenomena from their current state. This Bayesian model indicates how people should combine prior knowledge with observed data. Comparing this model with human judgments provides constraints on possible algorithms that people might use to predict the future. In the experiments, we examine the effects of multiple observations, the effects of prior knowledge, and the difference between independent and dependent observations, using both descriptions and direct experience of prediction problems. The results indicate that people integrate prior knowledge and observed data in a way that is consistent with our Bayesian model, ruling out some simple heuristics for predicting the future. We suggest some mechanisms that might lead to more complete algorithmic-level accounts.

[1]  R. Shepard,et al.  Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. , 1987, Science.

[2]  R. Sternberg,et al.  When will the milk spoil? Everyday induction in human intelligence , 1997 .

[3]  N. Bostrom Anthropic Bias: Observation Selection Effects in Science and Philosophy , 2002 .

[4]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  Homo Heuristicus: Why Biased Minds Make Better Inferences , 2009, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[5]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Word learning as Bayesian inference. , 2007, Psychological review.

[6]  T. Fearn,et al.  Bayesian statistics : principles, models, and applications , 1990 .

[7]  Adam N Sanborn,et al.  Exemplar models as a mechanism for performing Bayesian inference , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Optimal Predictions in Everyday Cognition , 2006, Psychological science.

[9]  L. S. Ross,et al.  The person and the situation , 1991 .

[10]  N. Goodman Fact, Fiction, and Forecast , 1955 .

[11]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Reflections of the Environment in Memory Form of the Memory Functions , 2022 .

[12]  J. Kruschke Locally Bayesian learning with applications to retrospective revaluation and highlighting. , 2006, Psychological review.

[13]  Simon Kirby,et al.  CogSci 2009 Proceedings , 2009 .

[14]  R. Hertwig,et al.  Decisions from Experience and the Effect of Rare Events in Risky Choice , 2004, Psychological science.

[15]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Sensitivity to Sampling in Bayesian Word Learning We Thank Members of the Ubc Baby Cognition Lab for Their Help with Data Collection, And , 2022 .

[16]  D. Eagleman,et al.  Causality and the perception of time , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[17]  Thomas L. Griffiths,et al.  Structure Learning in Human Causal Induction , 2000, NIPS.

[18]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Perceiving patterns in random series: dynamic processing of sequence in prefrontal cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  A. J. Hardwick Rise and fall , 1993, Nature.

[20]  Future prospects discussed , 1994, Nature.

[21]  J. Tenenbaum A Bayesian framework for concept learning , 1999 .

[22]  J. Gott Implications of the Copernican principle for our future prospects , 1993, Nature.

[23]  R. Baierlein Probability Theory: The Logic of Science , 2004 .

[24]  Refractor Vision , 2000, The Lancet.

[25]  L. Barsalou,et al.  Basing Categorization on Individuals and Events , 1998, Cognitive Psychology.

[26]  F. Guess Bayesian Statistics: Principles, Models, and Applications , 1990 .

[27]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[28]  L. Rüschendorf,et al.  On the Perception of Time , 2009, Gerontology.

[29]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The Adaptive Nature of Human Categorization. , 1991 .

[30]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Optimal Predictions in Everyday Cognition: The Wisdom of Individuals or Crowds? , 2008, Cogn. Sci..

[31]  L. M. M.-T. Theory of Probability , 1929, Nature.

[32]  Klaus Fiedler,et al.  Information Sampling and Adaptive Cognition , 2005 .

[33]  Stephan Lewandowsky,et al.  The Wisdom of Individuals: Exploring People's Knowledge About Everyday Events Using Iterated Learning , 2009, Cogn. Sci..