Radio-over-Fiber (RoF) for mobile backhauling: A technical and economic comparison between analog and digitized RoF

The massive deployment of new generation mobile handsets (tablets, smartphones) generates a rapid traffic growth in radio-mobile networks. Providing ubiquitous high capacity wireless links to mobile users remains today a technological and economic challenge. According to the state of the technology, the most efficient way to increase the capacity of radio-mobile networks consists in reducing drastically the size of each cell. Such an approach has a strong economic impact for radio-mobile operators. Radio-over-Fiber (RoF) techniques are considered today as a very promising solution to this problem. They consist in decoupling physically radio signal processing equipment from the antennas' sites to one or several remote locations upper in the mobile backhaul where can be placed the radio controllers. It becomes then possible to create farms of remote mobile base stations for which costly devices like radio-frequency (RF) oscillators can be pooled between multiple cells. Two generations of RoF techniques must be distinguished: Analog-RoF (A-RoF) whose feasibility has been demonstrated since the year 90s by means of multiple testbeds and Digitized-RoF (D-RoF) developed around the year 2000 exploiting the robustness of digital transmission links between the remote base stations and the antennas. The aim of this paper is to provide a quantitative comparison between A-RoF and D-RoF in terms of deployment cost (CAPEX) and energy consumption (OPEX) under various traffic growth assumptions.

[1]  Boris Murmann,et al.  A/D converter trends: Power dissipation, scaling and digitally assisted architectures , 2008, 2008 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference.

[2]  Yan Chen,et al.  QoS Requirements of Network Applications on the Internet , 2004, Inf. Knowl. Syst. Manag..

[3]  R S Tucker,et al.  Green Optical Communications—Part I: Energy Limitations in Transport , 2011, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[4]  Didier Colle,et al.  Power consumption modeling in optical multilayer networks , 2012, Photonic Network Communications.

[5]  Jens Zander,et al.  Impact of Backhauling Power Consumption on the Deployment of Heterogeneous Mobile Networks , 2011, 2011 IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference - GLOBECOM 2011.

[6]  Stefania Sesia,et al.  LTE - The UMTS Long Term Evolution, Second Edition , 2011 .

[7]  Maurice Gagnaire,et al.  Impairment-aware radio-over-fiber control plane for LTE antenna backhauling , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[8]  A. Nirmalathas,et al.  Design and Analysis of Digitized RF-Over-Fiber Links , 2009, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[9]  A.N. Willson,et al.  A power-scalable reconfigurable FFT/IFFT IC based on a multi-processor ring , 2006, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits.

[10]  Robert J. Baxley,et al.  Power savings analysis of peak-to-average power ratio in OFDM , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics.

[11]  Teguh Prakoso,et al.  Coverage Range and Cost Comparison of Remote Antenna Unit Designs for In­building Radio over Fiber Technology , 2008 .

[12]  Richard V. Penty,et al.  Wideband Radio over Fiber Distributed Antenna Systems for Energy Efficient In-Building Wireless Communications , 2010, 2010 IEEE 71st Vehicular Technology Conference.

[13]  Nathan J Gomes,et al.  Radio Over Fiber Link Design for Next Generation Wireless Systems , 2010, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[14]  Yizhuo Yang,et al.  Multichannel Digitized RF-Over-Fiber Transmission Based on Bandpass Sampling and FPGA , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[15]  R. S. Tucker,et al.  Scalability and Energy Consumption of Optical and Electronic Packet Switching , 2011, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[16]  Rodney G. Vaughan,et al.  The theory of bandpass sampling , 1991, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..