Integration of carbon conservation into sustainable forest management using high resolution satellite imagery: A case study in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo

Abstract Conservation of tropical forests is of outstanding importance for mitigation of climate change effects and preserving biodiversity. In Borneo most of the forests are classified as permanent forest estates and are selectively logged using conventional logging techniques causing high damage to the forest ecosystems. Incorporation of sustainable forest management into climate change mitigation measures such as Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) can help to avert further forest degradation by synergizing sustainable timber production with the conservation of biodiversity. In order to evaluate the efficiency of such initiatives, monitoring methods for forest degradation and above-ground biomass in tropical forests are urgently needed. In this study we developed an index using Landsat satellite data to describe the crown cover condition of lowland mixed dipterocarp forests. We showed that this index combined with field data can be used to estimate above-ground biomass using a regression model in two permanent forest estates in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. Tangkulap represented a conventionally logged forest estate while Deramakot has been managed in accordance with sustainable forestry principles. The results revealed that conventional logging techniques used in Tangkulap during 1991 and 2000 decreased the above-ground biomass by an annual amount of average −6.0 t C/ha (−5.2 to −7.0 t C/ha, 95% confidential interval) whereas the biomass in Deramakot increased by 6.1 t C/ha per year (5.3–7.2 t C/ha, 95% confidential interval) between 2000 and 2007 while under sustainable forest management. This indicates that sustainable forest management with reduced-impact logging helps to protect above-ground biomass. In absolute terms, a conservative amount of 10.5 t C/ha per year, as documented using the methodology developed in this study, can be attributed to the different management systems, which will be of interest when implementing REDD+ that rewards the enhancement of carbon stocks.

[1]  Sandra Brown,et al.  BIOMASS OF TROPICAL FORESTS OF SOUTH AND SOUTHEAST ASIA , 1991 .

[2]  P. Sist,et al.  Harvesting intensity versus sustainability in Indonesia , 1998 .

[3]  W. Salas,et al.  Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Frédéric Achard,et al.  Improved estimates of net carbon emissions from land cover change in the tropics for the 1990s , 2004 .

[5]  Sam Mannan,et al.  Sustainable use of tropical forests by reduced-impact logging in Deramakot Forest Reserve, Sabah, Malaysia , 2007, Ecological Research.

[6]  F. Putz,et al.  Improved Tropical Forest Management for Carbon Retention , 2008, PLoS biology.

[7]  Ryan K. C. Ong,et al.  DIPSIM: DIPTEROCARP FOREST GROWTH SIMULATION MODEL, A TOOL FOR FOREST-LEVEL MANAGEMENT PLANNING , 1996 .

[8]  Robert C. Ong,et al.  Timber yield from second entry logging in the lowland mixed dipterocarp forest of Deramakot, Sabah , 2010 .

[9]  P. Chavez An improved dark-object subtraction technique for atmospheric scattering correction of multispectral data , 1988 .

[10]  Ruth S. DeFries,et al.  Earth observations for estimating greenhouse gas emissions from deforestation in developing countries , 2007 .

[11]  G. Powell,et al.  High-resolution forest carbon stocks and emissions in the Amazon , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  Jeffrey Q. Chambers,et al.  TROPICAL FORESTS : AN EVALUATION AND SYNTHESIS OF EXISTING FIELD DATA , 2022 .

[13]  Cannon,et al.  Tree species diversity in commercially logged bornean rainforest , 1998, Science.

[14]  Frans Bongers,et al.  Above-ground biomass and productivity in a rain forest of eastern South America , 2008, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[15]  N. Chappell,et al.  Biomass variation across selectively logged forest within a 225 km2 region of Borneo and its prediction by Landsat TM , 2008 .

[16]  H. Priyadi,et al.  Reduced-impact logging in Indonesian Borneo: some results confirming the need for new silvicultural prescriptions , 2003 .

[17]  Dennis P. Dykstra,et al.  Why Poor Logging Practices Persist in the Tropics , 2000 .

[18]  F. Putz,et al.  Retaining Forest Biomass By Reducing Logging Damage , 1996 .

[19]  A. Gillespie,et al.  Topographic Normalization of Landsat TM Images of Forest Based on Subpixel Sun–Canopy–Sensor Geometry , 1998 .

[20]  Hiromitsu Samejima,et al.  Co-Benefits of Sustainable Forest Management in Biodiversity Conservation and Carbon Sequestration , 2009, PloS one.

[21]  Geoffrey M. Henebry,et al.  Pantropical dynamics of 'intact' rain forest canopy texture , 2001 .

[22]  B. Markham,et al.  Summary of Current Radiometric Calibration Coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI Sensors , 2009 .

[23]  D. Fuller,et al.  Tropical forest monitoring and remote sensing: A new era of transparency in forest governance? , 2006 .

[24]  R. B. Jackson,et al.  CO 2 emissions from forest loss , 2009 .

[25]  Sandra Englhart,et al.  Aboveground biomass retrieval in tropical forests — The potential of combined X- and L-band SAR data use , 2011 .

[26]  G. Asner,et al.  Cloud cover in Landsat observations of the Brazilian Amazon , 2001 .

[27]  M. Steininger Satellite estimation of tropical secondary forest above-ground biomass: Data from Brazil and Bolivia , 2000 .

[28]  Soo Chin Liew,et al.  Deforestation rates in insular Southeast Asia between 2000 and 2010 , 2011 .

[29]  Giles M. Foody,et al.  Mapping the biomass of Bornean tropical rain forest from remotely sensed data , 2001 .

[30]  Derek A. Roff,et al.  Introduction to Computer-Intensive Methods of Data Analysis in Biology: Preface , 2006 .

[31]  A. Lugo,et al.  Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests , 1997 .

[32]  Nobuo Imai,et al.  Distribution of phosphorus in an above-to-below-ground profile in a Bornean tropical rain forest , 2010, Journal of Tropical Ecology.

[33]  G. Foody,et al.  Predictive relations of tropical forest biomass from Landsat TM data and their transferability between regions , 2003 .

[34]  R. Houghton,et al.  Aboveground Forest Biomass and the Global Carbon Balance , 2005 .

[35]  John B. Adams,et al.  Classification of multispectral images based on fractions of endmembers: Application to land-cover change in the Brazilian Amazon , 1995 .

[36]  D. Burslem,et al.  Estimating aboveground biomass in forest and oil palm plantation in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo using ALOS PALSAR data , 2011 .

[37]  F. Siegert,et al.  Land cover change 2002–2005 in Borneo and the role of fire derived from MODIS imagery , 2007 .

[38]  Alan R. Gillespie,et al.  Interpretation and topographic compensation of conifer canopy self-shadowing , 2008 .

[39]  Faizah Abood,et al.  Sexual identification of bamboo borer Dinoderus minutus (Fabricius) (Coleoptera: Bostrychidae) , 2010 .

[40]  R. Mägi,et al.  Genetic Structure of Europeans: A View from the North–East , 2009, PloS one.

[41]  M. Keller,et al.  Selective Logging in the Brazilian Amazon , 2005, Science.

[42]  W. Barthlott,et al.  Global patterns of plant diversity and floristic knowledge , 2005 .

[43]  D. Lu Aboveground biomass estimation using Landsat TM data in the Brazilian Amazon , 2005 .

[44]  J. V. Soares,et al.  Distribution of aboveground live biomass in the Amazon basin , 2007 .

[45]  Sandra A. Brown,et al.  Monitoring and estimating tropical forest carbon stocks: making REDD a reality , 2007 .