Supply chain efficiency: a simulation cum DEA approach

The management of risks within the supply chain and external to it has become highly critical component of supply chain management. Inventory management is a vital tool to mitigate these risks. Lead times and review periods are important parameters in inventory management. The organizations focus on these parameters to enhance the system-wide supply chain performance in terms of services to customers. This paper aims at analyzing the efficiency of total supply chain in context of average fill rate performance. We analyze the efficiency of a hypothetical supply chain network structure which is subjected to time delays due to lead time and inventory review period changes. To understand the optimal relative efficiency among different values of average fill rate performance obtained through simulation, we used Data Envelopment Analysis approach (DEA). Taguchi experimental design procedure is used as a vehicle for conducting the simulation experiments and analyzing its outcome. The proposed integration of simulation with DEA framework provides practical implications to the decision maker as well as connotes to the real world situation where different enterprises compete for the frontier supply chain efficiency.

[1]  Hung‐Chang Liao,et al.  Optimizing multi‐response problem in the Taguchi method by DEA based ranking method , 2002 .

[2]  Chelsea C. White,et al.  An Inventory Control Model with Possible Border Disruptions , 2005 .

[3]  K. B. Hendricks,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of the Effect of Supply Chain Disruptions on Long‐Run Stock Price Performance and Equity Risk of the Firm , 2005 .

[4]  M. Christopher Logistics and Supply Chain Management: Strategies for Reducing Cost and Improving Service (Second Edition) , 1999 .

[5]  Anthony D. Ross,et al.  An analysis of operations efficiency in large-scale distribution systems , 2004 .

[6]  Diwakar Gupta,et al.  The {Q,r) Inventory System With An Unreliable Supplier , 1996 .

[7]  Vipul Jain,et al.  Studying the impact of various inventory policies on a supply chain with intermittent supply disruptions , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).

[8]  Jennifer Blackhurst,et al.  The Severity of Supply Chain Disruptions: Design Characteristics and Mitigation Capabilities , 2007, Decis. Sci..

[9]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  Supply chain DEA: production possibility set and performance evaluation model , 2011, Ann. Oper. Res..

[10]  Mark S. Fox,et al.  Agent-Oriented Supply-Chain Management , 2000 .

[11]  Christopher S. Tang Perspectives in supply chain risk management , 2006 .

[12]  David F. Pyke,et al.  Inventory management and production planning and scheduling , 1998 .

[13]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[14]  G. De Sensi,et al.  Inventory policies analysis under demand patterns and lead times constraints in a real supply chain , 2008 .

[15]  Yi-Chi Wang,et al.  Evaluating flexibility on order quantity and delivery lead time for a supply chain system , 2008, Int. J. Syst. Sci..

[16]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  A methodology for monitoring system performance , 2002 .

[17]  Powell E. Robinson,et al.  Flow Coordination and Information Sharing in Supply Chains: Review, Implications, and Directions for Future Research , 2002, Decis. Sci..

[18]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies , 2000, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  R. Henry,et al.  Buyer perceptions of supply disruption risk: A behavioral view and empirical assessment , 2010 .

[20]  Randall P. Sadowski,et al.  Simulation with Arena , 1998 .

[21]  Esmail Mohebbi,et al.  Supply interruptions in a lost-sales inventory system with random lead time , 2003, Comput. Oper. Res..

[22]  B. Lewis,et al.  Inventory Control with Risk of Major Supply Chain Disruptions , 2005 .

[23]  Joe Zhu,et al.  DEA models for supply chain efficiency evaluation , 2006, Ann. Oper. Res..

[24]  Fangruo Chen Decentralized supply chains subject to information delays , 1999 .

[25]  Rahul Caprihan,et al.  Strategic positioning of inventory review policies in alternative supply chain networks: an information-sharing paradigm perspective , 2013 .

[26]  Kuan Yew Wong,et al.  Supply chain performance measurement system using DEA modeling , 2007, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[27]  G. Zsidisin,et al.  Purchasing organization involvement in risk assessments, contingency plans, and risk management: an exploratory study , 2000 .

[28]  Hau L. Lee,et al.  Mitigating supply chain risk through improved confidence , 2004 .

[29]  Navin K. Dev,et al.  Design of fractal information coordination system in a supply chain network , 2012 .

[30]  Philip M. Kaminsky,et al.  Designing and managing the supply chain : concepts, strategies, and case studies , 2007 .

[31]  S. T. Enns,et al.  Evaluating the effects of capacity constraints and demand patterns on supply chain replenishment strategies , 2006 .

[32]  Claudia Colicchia,et al.  A simulation-based framework to evaluate strategies for managing global inbound supply risk , 2011 .

[33]  Srinivas Talluri,et al.  Supplier Evaluation and Rationalization via Data Envelopment Analysis: An Empirical Examination , 2001 .

[34]  Marshall L. Fisher,et al.  Supply Chain Inventory Management and the Value of Shared Information , 2000 .

[35]  Ephraim F. Sudit,et al.  Productivity measurement in industrial operations , 1995 .

[36]  Stephan M. Wagner,et al.  An empirical investigation into supply chain vulnerability , 2006 .

[37]  Y. Sheffi,et al.  A supply chain view of the resilient enterprise , 2005 .

[38]  R. C. Baker,et al.  A multi-phase mathematical programming approach for effective supply chain design , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[39]  Yuerong Chen,et al.  Impacts of supply disruptions and customer differentiation on a partial-backordering inventory system , 2010, Simul. Model. Pract. Theory.

[40]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A new network epsilon-based DEA model for supply chain performance evaluation , 2013, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[41]  Abbas Al-Refaie,et al.  Solving the multi-response problem in Taguchi method by benevolent formulation in DEA , 2011, J. Intell. Manuf..

[42]  Michael J. Magazine,et al.  Quantitative Models for Supply Chain Management , 1998 .

[43]  Madhan Shridhar Phadke,et al.  Quality Engineering Using Robust Design , 1989 .

[44]  S. Chopra,et al.  Supply Chain Management: Strategy, Planning & Operation , 2007 .

[45]  J. W. Patterson,et al.  Comparison of push and pull control strategies for supply network management in a make-to-stock environment , 2004 .

[46]  Srinagesh Gavirneni,et al.  Value of Information Sharing and Comparison with Delayed Differentiation , 1999 .

[47]  Paul H. Zipkin,et al.  Inventory Control with Information About Supply Conditions , 1996 .

[48]  Jan Olhager,et al.  Simulating production and inventory control systems: a learning approach to operational excellence , 2006 .

[49]  Rahul Caprihan,et al.  A case study on redesign of supply chain network of a manufacturing organization , 2011 .

[50]  Mahmut Parlar,et al.  Inventory models with unreliable suppliersin a random environment , 1999, Ann. Oper. Res..

[51]  Andreas Norrman,et al.  Ericsson’s Proactive Supply Chain Risk Management-approach After a Serious Supplier Accident , 2004 .

[52]  Victoria C. P. Chen,et al.  Performance analysis of conjoined supply chains , 2001 .

[53]  M. Parlar,et al.  A periodic review inventory model with Markovian supply availability , 1995 .

[54]  Xueping Li,et al.  The effect of customer segmentation on an inventory system in the presence of supply disruptions , 2009, Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC).