Method for the determination of optimal work environment in office buildings considering energy consumption and human performance

Abstract How to balance the contradiction between energy saving and improvement of indoor environmental quality which consequently affects human performance has always been a problem. We put forward the economically optimum condition as a concept that maximized economic benefit in terms of regulation of office environment parameters. The calculation method was provided by which energy consumption could be reduced without compromise of human performance. A regression model predicting the energy consumption of a typical office building was illustrated as a function of two indoor environment parameters, i.e., indoor air temperature and air ventilation rate. Practical factors including salary and electric price, which have impact on the condition determination, were discussed. As a prototype, an office building in Shanghai achieved its economically optimal conditions at an air temperature of 25.1 °C and an outdoor ventilation rate of 17.9 L/s-person in summer.

[1]  Mark J. Mendell,et al.  Non‐Specific Symptoms In Office Workers: A Review And Summary Of The Epidemiologic Literature , 1993 .

[2]  A. Rosenfeld,et al.  Estimates of Improved Productivity and Health from Better Indoor Environments , 1997 .

[3]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .

[4]  Joseph C. Lam,et al.  Multiple regression models for energy use in air-conditioned office buildings in different climates , 2010 .

[5]  P. Fanger,et al.  The effects of outdoor air supply rate in an office on perceived air quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and productivity. , 2000, Indoor air.

[6]  Li Lan,et al.  The effects of air temperature on office workers' well-being, workload and productivity-evaluated with subjective ratings. , 2010, Applied ergonomics.

[7]  O Seppänen,et al.  Ventilation and performance in office work. , 2006, Indoor air.

[8]  W. Fisk.  HEALTH AND PRODUCTIVITY GAINS FROM BETTER INDOOR ENVIRONMENTS AND THEIR RELATIONSHIP WITH BUILDING ENERGY EFFICIENCY , 2000 .

[9]  Geo Clausen,et al.  The Combined Effects of Many Different Indoor Environmental Factors on Acceptability and Office Work Performance , 2008 .

[10]  W. Fisk,et al.  Association of ventilation rates and CO2 concentrations with health and other responses in commercial and institutional buildings. , 1999, Indoor air.

[11]  Ash M Genaidy,et al.  Determinants of business sustainability: An ergonomics perspective , 2009, Ergonomics.

[12]  Derek J. Croome,et al.  Air-conditioning in China , 1995 .

[13]  Li Lan,et al.  Neurobehavioral approach for evaluation of office workers' productivity : The effects of room temperature , 2009 .

[14]  Bahram Moshfegh,et al.  Energy demand and indoor climate in a low energy building—changed control strategies and boundary conditions , 2006 .

[15]  Z. Lian,et al.  Quantitative measurement of productivity loss due to thermal discomfort , 2011 .

[16]  Pawel Wargocki,et al.  PRODUCTIVITY IS AFFECTED BY THE AIR QUALITY IN OFFICES , 2000 .

[17]  A. Omer.  Energy, environment and sustainable development , 2008 .

[18]  Andrew Thatcher,et al.  Green ergonomics: definition and scope , 2013, Ergonomics.

[19]  Joseph C. Lam,et al.  Regression analysis of high-rise fully air-conditioned office buildings , 1997 .

[20]  Zhiwei Lian,et al.  Use of neurobehavioral tests to evaluate the effects of indoor environment quality on productivity , 2009 .

[21]  G. Clausen,et al.  The effects of moderate heat stress and open-plan office noise distraction on SBS symptoms and on the performance of office work. , 2004, Indoor air.

[22]  D K Milton,et al.  Risk of sick leave associated with outdoor air supply rate, humidification, and occupant complaints. , 2000, Indoor air.

[23]  S. Hygge,et al.  EFFECTS OF NOISE, HEAT AND INDOOR LIGHTING ON COGNITIVE PERFORMANCE AND SELF-REPORTED AFFECT , 2001 .