A methodology to facilitate knowledge sharing in the new product development process

This paper describes the findings of an exploratory case study to investigate knowledge sharing problems in the new product development (NPD) process of a multi-national manufacturing company, and classifies the problems into three categories, i.e. (a) the lack of an explicit definition and prioritization of information about the knowledge used in the NPD process, (b) the challenges raised by, and lack of tools to support, knowledge sharing in a multilingual, multidisciplinary environment, and (c) the dissemination of information about the task and process knowledge to process users. An ontology-based methodology has been proposed, and a pilot study has been carried out to solve these problems. The pilot study includes the selection of suitable candidate tasks (or sub-processes) for the study, the elicitation of information about the selected task knowledge, the development of task knowledge ontology, and a mechanism to visualize and disseminate the ontology to process users. Early implementation and tests have shown that the proposed methodology may be used to facilitate knowledge sharing in the new product development process. The project was sponsored by a leading heating system manufacturer and further tests will be carried out with real industrial problems.

[1]  Amrit Tiwana,et al.  Supporting Collaborative Process Knowledge Management in New Product Development Teams , 1999, Decis. Support Syst..

[2]  Julian Kilker,et al.  Conflict on collaborative design teams: understanding the role of social identities , 1999, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[3]  Weiming Shen,et al.  A review of Internet-based product information sharing and visualization , 2004, Comput. Ind..

[4]  Paul W. H. Chung,et al.  ONTOLOGIES TO SUPPORT THE MANAGEMENT OF NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT IN THE CHEMICAL PROCESS INDUSTRIES , 2007 .

[5]  Cengiz Yilmaz,et al.  Learning Process in New Product Development Teams and Effects on Product Success: A Socio-Cognitive Perspective , 2006 .

[6]  S D Eppinger,et al.  Innovation at the speed of information. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[7]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[8]  John Debenham,et al.  The knowledge audit , 1994 .

[9]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Improving knowledge intensive processes through an enterprise knowledge medium , 1999, SIGCPR '99.

[10]  Frehiwot Fisseha,et al.  A Comprehensive Framework for Building Multilingual Domain Ontologies: Creating a Prototype Biosecurity Ontology , 2002, Dublin Core Conference.

[11]  Vassilis Agouridas,et al.  Methods and Tools for Requirements Engineering of Made-to-Order Mechanical Products , 2002 .

[12]  J. Liebowitz,et al.  The knowledge audit , 2000 .

[13]  Mark A. Musen,et al.  The Knowledge Model of Protégé-2000: Combining Interoperability and Flexibility , 2000, EKAW.

[14]  R. Valkenburg,et al.  Learning from collaborative new product development projects , 2005 .

[15]  Asunción Gómez-Pérez,et al.  Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies: Where is their meeting point? , 2003, Data Knowl. Eng..

[16]  N. F. Noy,et al.  Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology , 2001 .

[17]  Rajkumar Roy,et al.  A Product Ontology for Automotive Seat Specification , 2004, DAC 2004.

[18]  Debra Zahay,et al.  Sources, uses, and forms of data in the new product development process , 2004 .

[19]  V. R. Benjamins,et al.  WonderTools? A comparative study of ontological engineering tools , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[20]  Gilles Falquet,et al.  Ontology-Based Multilingual Information Retrieval , 2005, CLEF.

[21]  Dieter Fensel,et al.  Knowledge Engineering: Principles and Methods , 1998, Data Knowl. Eng..

[22]  José F.B. Gieskes,et al.  Learning and improvement in product innovation processes: Enabling behaviors , 2001 .

[23]  H. Sofia Pinto,et al.  Ontologies: How can They be Built? , 2004, Knowledge and Information Systems.

[24]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Product Design and Development , 1995 .

[25]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT: PAST RESEARCH, PRESENT FINDINGS, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS , 1995 .

[26]  Patrick Lambrix,et al.  Evaluation of ontology development tools for bioinformatics , 2003, Bioinform..

[27]  Pascale Fung,et al.  Creating a Bilingual Ontology: A Corpus-Based Approach for Aligning WordNet and HowNet , 2002 .

[28]  Mohsen Rezayat,et al.  Knowledge-based product development using XML and KCs , 2000, Comput. Aided Des..

[29]  Kevin C. Desouza,et al.  Global Knowledge Management Strategies , 2003 .

[30]  Jorge F. S. Gomes,et al.  Critical success factors for cross‐functional teamwork in new product development , 2000 .

[31]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Predicting technical communication in product development organizations , 1995 .

[32]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A translation approach to portable ontology specifications , 1993 .

[33]  Mark R. Cutkosky,et al.  SHARE: A Methodology and Environment for Collaborative Product Development , 1994, Int. J. Cooperative Inf. Syst..