Influence of recording site withing the muscle on motor unit potentials

The influence of the recording site on the motor unit potentials (MUPs) was investigated in the brachial biceps muscle of 8 healthy subjects. The MUPs were recorded with a concentric needle electrode and analyzed with a new decomposition EMG program we call multi‐MUP analysis. MUPs had shorter durations and smaller amplitudes at superficial recording sites than at deeper sites in the muscle. This is mainly due to the cannula of the concentric electrode, which records a higher potential at superficial recording sites and partially cancels the recorded potentials from the tip in a differential recording. The MUPs had longer durations and higher amplitudes distally than in the middle of the muscle. The longer durations and spike durations are probably due to increased temporal dispersion at a greater distance from the endplate zone. We do not have an adequate explanation for the larger amplitudes distally in the biceps, they may be due to anatomical factors. To increase the diagnostic sensitivity of quantitative MUP analysis the recordings should be obtained from standardized recording sites. © 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

[1]  S. Andreassen,et al.  Quantitative Analysis of Individual Motor Unit Potentials: A Proposition for Standardized Terminology and Criteria for Measurement , 1986, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[2]  F BUCHTHAL,et al.  ACTION POTENTIAL PARAMETERS IN DIFFERENT HUMAN MUSCLES , 1955, Acta psychiatrica et neurologica Scandinavica.

[3]  E Stålberg,et al.  Simulation of macro EMG motor unit potentials. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[4]  B Conrad,et al.  Is there an age-dependent continuous increase in the duration of the motor unit action potential? , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  E Stålberg,et al.  Macro EMG, a new recording technique. , 1980, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[6]  Kevin C. McGill,et al.  Automatic Decomposition of the Clinical Electromyogram , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[7]  I Petersén,et al.  MUSCLE ACTION POTENTIALS STUDIED BY FREQUENCY ANALYSIS AND DURATION MEASUREMENT , 1965, Acta neurologica Scandinavica. Supplementum.

[8]  F BUCHTHAL,et al.  Action potential parameters in normal human muscle and their dependence on physical variables. , 1954, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.

[9]  B Mambrito,et al.  A technique for the detection, decomposition and analysis of the EMG signal. , 1984, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  S D Nandedkar,et al.  Analysis of amplitude and area of concentric needle EMG motor unit action potentials. , 1988, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[11]  E Stålberg,et al.  Reference values of motor unit action potentials obtained with multi‐MUAP analysis , 1994, Muscle & nerve.

[12]  E Stålberg,et al.  The ability of MUP parameters to discriminate between normal and neurogenic MUPs in concentric EMG: analysis of the MUP "thickness" and the proposal of "size index". , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[13]  F BUCHTHAL,et al.  Action potential parameters in normal human muscle and their physiological determinants. , 1954, Acta physiologica Scandinavica.