The functional neuroanatomy of visual conjunction search: a parametric fMRI study

Visual conjunction search is proposed to be a multicomponent process which involves scaling and successive shifts of attention in space as well as object identification. Here, we first mapped brain areas sustaining the proposed attentional subprocesses and then tested whether their activity was modulated by search load, i.e., the number of shifts, as predicted by serial search models. Search load was manipulated indirectly by precueing a varying number of locations at which relevant objects were shown. Multiple subregions within the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) and the prefrontal cortex were activated after cueing. Activity in the right posterior IPS was modulated by the distance of attention shifts and in the left posterior IPS by "zooming out" to cover a large region of the visual field. More anterior subregions of the left IPS responded to object identification irrespective of the need for serial scanning. Corresponding regions in the right IPS were modulated parametrically with respect to search load, along with the right temporoparietal junction. These results support a functional segregation of subregions of the IPS. The posterior regions participate in large-scale shifts and scaling of the attentional focus and the anterior regions in object identification and rapid serial shifts during search. The sustained activation in the frontal eye fields after cueing suggests a role in maintaining attention in the periphery. Together with the findings in early visual areas from this experiment (Müller et al., 2003) the current observations are best accounted for by hybrid models of visual conjunction search, where parallel processing in visual and temporoparietal regions and serial scanning controlled by the right IPS cooperate.

[1]  C Miniussi,et al.  Orienting attention in time. , 2001, Frontiers in bioscience : a journal and virtual library.

[2]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting attention in time: behavioural and neuroanatomical distinction between exogenous and endogenous shifts , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Superior Parietal Cortex Activation During Spatial Attention Shifts and Visual Feature Conjunction , 1995, Science.

[5]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A PET study of visuospatial attention , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Human cortical mechanisms of visual attention during orienting and search. , 1998, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[7]  L. Robertson,et al.  Effects of lesions of temporal-parietal junction on perceptual and attentional processing in humans , 1988, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Mintun,et al.  Positron emission tomography study of voluntary saccadic eye movements and spatial working memory. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  D. V. von Cramon,et al.  Functional organization of the lateral premotor cortex: fMRI reveals different regions activated by anticipation of object properties, location and speed. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[10]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[11]  R. Knight,et al.  Age-related changes in fronto-parietal networks during spatial memory: an ERP study. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[12]  C. Büchel,et al.  Dissociable Neural Responses Related to Pain Intensity, Stimulus Intensity, and Stimulus Awareness within the Anterior Cingulate Cortex: A Parametric Single-Trial Laser Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Ken Nakayama,et al.  Serial and parallel processing of visual feature conjunctions , 1986, Nature.

[14]  Min-Shik Kim,et al.  Perceptual grouping via spatial selection in a focused-attention task , 2001, Vision Research.

[15]  Arno Villringer,et al.  A Physiological Correlate of the “Zoom Lens” of Visual Attention , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Robert T. Knight,et al.  Contributions of Subregions of the Prefrontal Cortex to Working Memory: Evidence from Brain Lesions in Humans , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[17]  F. Royer,et al.  Aging and similarity grouping in visual search. , 1985, Journal of gerontology.

[18]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  A Review of Hemispheric Asymmetry: What's Right and What's Left , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  N. J. Herrod,et al.  Maintaining and shifting attention within left or right hemifield. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[21]  L. Chelazzi Serial attention mechanisms in visual search: A critical look at the evidence , 1999, Psychological research.

[22]  U. Castiello,et al.  Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[23]  D. LaBerge Spatial extent of attention to letters and words. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  J. Palmer,et al.  Measuring the effect of attention on simple visual search. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  SEarch via recursive rejection (SERR) , 1998 .

[26]  Susan L. Franzel,et al.  Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional Anatomy of Visual Search: Regional Segregations within the Frontal Eye Fields and Effective Connectivity of the Superior Colliculus , 2002, NeuroImage.

[28]  T. Robbins,et al.  Decision-making processes following damage to the prefrontal cortex. , 2002, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[29]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[30]  S. Yantis,et al.  Transient neural activity in human parietal cortex during spatial attention shifts , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Neural Basis of Endogenous and Exogenous Spatial Orienting: A Functional MRI Study , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  Hugo D. Critchley,et al.  Volitional Control of Autonomic Arousal: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Study , 2002, NeuroImage.

[33]  H. J. Muller,et al.  SEarch via Recursive Rejection (SERR): A Connectionist Model of Visual Search , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[34]  W. D. Ross,et al.  A Neural Theory of Attentive Visual Search : Interactions of Boundary , Surface , Spatial , and Object Representations By : Stephen Grossberg , 2004 .

[35]  Victor A. F. Lamme,et al.  The implementation of visual routines , 2000, Vision Research.

[36]  R Parasuraman,et al.  Dynamics of the spatial scale of visual attention revealed by brain event-related potentials. , 2001, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[37]  T. Hendler,et al.  Contrast sensitivity in human visual areas and its relationship to object recognition. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[38]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Neural Systems for Visual Orienting and Their Relationships to Spatial Working Memory , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  G. Orban,et al.  The kinetic occipital region in human visual cortex. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[40]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Attention, pattern recognition and popout in visual search , 1998 .

[41]  S. Luck,et al.  Neural sources of focused attention in visual search. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[42]  L. Robertson,et al.  Neuropsychological contributions to theories of part/whole organization , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[43]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Eccentricity Bias as an Organizing Principle for Human High-Order Object Areas , 2002, Neuron.

[44]  Jeffrey D Schall,et al.  The neural selection and control of saccades by the frontal eye field. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[45]  M. Corbetta,et al.  A Common Network of Functional Areas for Attention and Eye Movements , 1998, Neuron.

[46]  Geoffrey F Woodman,et al.  Serial deployment of attention during visual search. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[47]  G. Glover Deconvolution of Impulse Response in Event-Related BOLD fMRI1 , 1999, NeuroImage.

[48]  Geoffrey F. Woodman,et al.  Electrophysiological measurement of rapid shifts of attention during visual search , 1999, Nature.

[49]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[50]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Shifting attention in visual space: tests of moving-spotlight models versus an activity-distribution model. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  A. Nobre,et al.  Where and When to Pay Attention: The Neural Systems for Directing Attention to Spatial Locations and to Time Intervals as Revealed by Both PET and fMRI , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  R. E. Passingham,et al.  Interference with Performance of a Response Selection Task that has no Working Memory Component: An rTMS Comparison of the Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Medial Frontal Cortex , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[54]  D. Gitelman,et al.  Location- or Feature-Based Targeting of Peripheral Attention , 2001, NeuroImage.

[55]  G A Orban,et al.  Attention to One or Two Features in Left or Right Visual Field: A Positron Emission Tomography Study , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[56]  R Parasuraman,et al.  Scale of attentional focus in visual search , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention Response Functions Characterizing Brain Areas Using fMRI Activation during Parametric Variations of Attentional Load , 2001, Neuron.

[58]  T. Paus Location and function of the human frontal eye-field: A selective review , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Effects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention , 1984, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[60]  D. Homa,et al.  Sensitization of the visual field. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[61]  Michael S. Beauchamp,et al.  A Parametric fMRI Study of Overt and Covert Shifts of Visuospatial Attention , 2001, NeuroImage.

[62]  R. S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for global and local processing: the effect of stimulus category , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[63]  F. J. Friedrich,et al.  Spatial attention deficits in humans: a comparison of superior parietal and temporal-parietal junction lesions. , 1998, Neuropsychology.

[64]  H. Duvernoy,et al.  The Human Brain: Surface, Three-Dimensional Sectional Anatomy with MRI, and Blood Supply , 1999 .

[65]  A. Treisman Perceptual grouping and attention in visual search for features and for objects. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[66]  Joshua W. Brown,et al.  Monitoring and Control of Action by the Frontal Lobes , 2002, Neuron.

[67]  S. Grossberg The Attentive Brain , 1995 .

[68]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[69]  R. Desimone,et al.  Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. , 1995, Annual review of neuroscience.

[70]  D. Gitelman,et al.  Functional Specificity of Superior Parietal Mediation of Spatial Shifting , 2001, NeuroImage.

[71]  J. Downar,et al.  A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[72]  J. Schall,et al.  Performance monitoring by the supplementary eye ® eld , 2000 .

[73]  R. Malach,et al.  The topography of high-order human object areas , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[74]  A. Dale,et al.  The Representation of Illusory and Real Contours in Human Cortical Visual Areas Revealed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[75]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[76]  M Corbetta,et al.  Frontoparietal cortical networks for directing attention and the eye to visual locations: identical, independent, or overlapping neural systems? , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[77]  S. Luck Cognitive and neural mechanisms of visual search , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[78]  Talma Hendler,et al.  Center–periphery organization of human object areas , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[79]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[81]  Richard N. A. Henson,et al.  The Effects of Interdistracter Similarity on Search Processes in Superior Parietal Cortex , 2002, NeuroImage.

[82]  R. Ivry,et al.  Response Channel Activation and the Temporoparietal Junction , 1998, Brain and Cognition.

[83]  G. R. Mangun,et al.  A Role for Top-Down Attentional Orienting during Interference between Global and Local Aspects of Hierarchical Stimuli , 2002, NeuroImage.

[84]  Joel R. Meyer,et al.  A large-scale distributed network for covert spatial attention: further anatomical delineation based on stringent behavioural and cognitive controls. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[85]  A. Villringer,et al.  Involvement of the human frontal eye field and multiple parietal areas in covert visual selection during conjunction search , 2000, The European journal of neuroscience.

[86]  Carol L. Colby,et al.  Stimulus–Response Incompatibility Activates Cortex Proximate to Three Eye Fields , 2001, NeuroImage.

[87]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Generality of Parietal Involvement in Visual Attention , 1999, Neuron.

[88]  Bela Julesz,et al.  Enhanced detection in the aperture of focal attention during simple discrimination tasks , 1986, Nature.

[89]  J. Duncan,et al.  Common regions of the human frontal lobe recruited by diverse cognitive demands , 2000, Trends in Neurosciences.

[90]  E. William Yund,et al.  Spatial frequency and attention: Effects of level-, target-, and location-repetition on the processing of global and local forms , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[91]  S. Zeki,et al.  The neurology of saccades and covert shifts in spatial attention: an event-related fMRI study. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[92]  D. Gitelman,et al.  Covert Visual Spatial Orienting and Saccades: Overlapping Neural Systems , 2000, NeuroImage.

[93]  G. Orban,et al.  Attention Mechanisms in Visual SearchAn fMRI Study , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[94]  Jeffrey D. Schall,et al.  Neural basis of deciding, choosing and acting , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.