Compression assessment based on medical image quality concepts using computer-generated test images

Compression algorithms are widely used in medical imaging systems for efficient image storage, transmission, and display. In the acceptance of lossy compression algorithms in the clinical environment, important factors are the assessment of 'visually lossless' compression thresholds, as well as the development of assessment methods requiring fewer data and time than observer performance based studies. In this study a set of quantitative measurements related to medical image quality parameters is proposed for compression assessment. Measurements were carried out using region of interest (ROI) operations on computer-generated test images, with characteristics similar to radiographic images. As a paradigm, the assessment of the lossy Joint Photographic Expert Group (JPEG) algorithm, available in a telematics application for healthcare, is presented. A compression ratio of 15 was found as the visually lossless threshold for the JPEG lossy algorithm, in agreement with previous observer performance studies. Up to this ratio low contrast discrimination is not affected, image noise level is decreased, high contrast line-pair amplitude is decreased by less than 3%, and input/output gray level differences are minor (less than 1%). This type of assessment provides information regarding the type of loss, offering cost and time benefits, in parallel with the advantages of test image adaptation to the requirements of a certain imaging modality and clinical study.

[1]  T Liebig,et al.  Wavelet versus JPEG (Joint Photographic Expert Group) and fractal compression. Impact on the detection of low-contrast details in computed radiographs. , 1998, Investigative radiology.

[2]  H. K. Huang,et al.  Teleradiology technologies and some service models. , 1996, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[3]  G G Cox,et al.  Contrast-detail analysis of image degradation due to lossy compression. , 1995, Medical physics.

[4]  J A Brink,et al.  Evaluation of JPEG and wavelet compression of body CT images for direct digital teleradiologic transmission. , 2000, Radiology.

[5]  Andreas Uhl,et al.  Selective medical image compression techniques for telemedical and archiving applications , 2000, Comput. Biol. Medicine.

[6]  L Costaridou,et al.  A protocol-based evaluation of medical image digitizers. , 2001, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  竹本 宜弘 JPEG (Joint Photographic Experts Group) , 1995 .

[8]  L Costaridou,et al.  Using component technologies for web based wavelet enhanced mammographic image visualization , 2000, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[9]  D Okkalides,et al.  Quality assessment of DSA, ultrasound and CT digital images compressed with the JPEG protocol. , 1994, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  Michael G. Strintzis,et al.  A review of compression methods for medical images in PACS , 1998, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[11]  D Okkalides Assessment of commercial compression algorithms, of the lossy DCT and lossless types, applied to diagnostic digital image files. , 1998, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[12]  M L Giger,et al.  Data compression: effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography. , 1991, Radiology.

[13]  L Costaridou,et al.  An image visualization tool in mammography. , 1999, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[14]  J D Hazle,et al.  Performance analysis of a new semiorthogonal spline wavelet compression algorithm for tonal medical images. , 2000, Medical physics.

[15]  Dimitrios K. Lymberopoulos,et al.  OTE-TS - a new value-added telematics service for telemedicine applications , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[16]  J Kivijärvi,et al.  A Comparison of Lossless Compression Methods for Medical Images , 2022 .

[17]  Touradj Ebrahimi,et al.  Christopoulos: Thc Jpeg2000 Still Image Coding System: an Overview the Jpeg2000 Still Image Coding System: an Overview , 2022 .

[18]  L Costaridou,et al.  A tool for designing digital test objects for module performance evaluation in medical digital imaging. , 1999, Medical informatics and the Internet in medicine.

[19]  H. K. Huang PACS : basic principles and applications , 1999 .

[20]  George C. Anastassopoulos,et al.  ELPIDA: a general architecture for medical imaging systems supporting telemedicine applications , 1995, J. Electronic Imaging.